Einstein-Face (CASA 4.0): Difference between revisions

From CASA Guides
Jump to navigationJump to search
Jbraatz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Jbraatz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
'''Prepare inputs for simobserve and simanalyze'''
'''Prepare inputs for simobserve and simanalyze'''


Start with the 10min full science observation. Inputs to '''simobserve''' and '''simanalyze''' are given below. The integration time (300 s) is set much longer than we would see in a real ALMA observation (1 to 10 s) to speed the computation. The map spacing is set to ensure that only one pointing is observed. The image scale is chosen to ensure good sampling of the beam, and the observation is pointed near the Chandra Deep Field South:
We will start with a 10 minute observation using one of the "full science" antenna configurations. Inputs to '''simobserve''' and '''simanalyze''' are given below. The integration time (300 s) is set much longer than we would see in a real ALMA observation (1 to 10 s) to speed the computation. We set the angular size of the image to 0.043 arcsecond pixels with the '''incell''' parameter, ensuring that only one pointing is needed to map the whole image area.   The image coordinates are set to a position near the Chandra Deep Field South.


<source lang="python">
<source lang="python">
Line 31: Line 31:
pointingspacing = '1arcmin'
pointingspacing = '1arcmin'
graphics = 'both'
graphics = 'both'
obsmode = 'int'
antennalist =  "alma.out08.cfg"
totaltime = '600s'
thermalnoise = ""
simobserve()
</source>
</source>


Antenna configuration:  
An aside about antenna configurations:  
ALMA antenna configuration files are stored in a directory found in the CASA installation.  
ALMA will observe with many different array configurations.  In our simulations we can specify which antenna configuration to use with the '''antennalist''' parameter.  Your CASA distribution comes with a set of antenna configurations.  You can locate the configurations like so:
Details on configuration choices are given in the M51 simulation guide [http://casaguides.nrao.edu/index.php?title=M51_at_z_%3D_0.1_and_z_%3D_0.3_(CASA_3.4)].
 
CASA <49>: print os.getenv('CASAPATH').sp lit(' ')[0] + '/data/alma/simmos/'
/usr/lib64/casapy/stable/data/alma/simmos/
 
CASA <50>: ls /usr/lib64/casapy/stable/data/alma/simmos/
aca_cycle1.cfg            alma.out05.cfg  alma.out21.cfg  pdbi-c.cfg
aca.i.cfg                alma.out06.cfg  alma.out22.cfg  pdbi-d.cfg
aca.ns.cfg                alma.out07.cfg  alma.out23.cfg  sma.compact.cfg
aca.tp.cfg                alma.out08.cfg  alma.out24.cfg  sma.compact.n.cfg
alma.cycle0.compact.cfg  alma.out09.cfg  alma.out25.cfg  sma.extended.cfg
alma.cycle0.extended.cfg  alma.out10.cfg  alma.out26.cfg  sma.subcompact.cfg
alma_cycle1_1.cfg        alma.out11.cfg  alma.out27.cfg  sma.vextended.cfg
alma_cycle1_2.cfg        alma.out12.cfg  alma.out28.cfg  vla.a.cfg
alma_cycle1_3.cfg        alma.out13.cfg  carma.a.cfg    vla.b.cfg
alma_cycle1_4.cfg        alma.out14.cfg  carma.b.cfg    vla.bna.cfg
alma_cycle1_5.cfg        alma.out15.cfg  carma.c.cfg    vla.c.cfg
alma_cycle1_6.cfg        alma.out16.cfg  carma.d.cfg    vla.cnb.cfg
alma.out01.cfg            alma.out17.cfg  carma.e.cfg    vla.d.cfg
alma.out02.cfg            alma.out18.cfg  meerkat.cfg    vla.dnc.cfg
alma.out03.cfg            alma.out19.cfg  pdbi-a.cfg      WSRT.cfg
alma.out04.cfg            alma.out20.cfg  pdbi-b.cfg


Now back to the simulation.  Execute '''simanalyze''' with the following parameters:


<source lang="python">
<source lang="python">
obsmode = 'int'
antennalist =  "alma.out08.cfg"
totaltime = '600s'
thermalnoise = ""
simobserve()
# simanalyze is used to take the simulation output, and provide helpful plots
# simanalyze is used to take the simulation output, and provide helpful plots
default('simanalyze')
default('simanalyze')
Line 62: Line 82:
[[File:einstein_fs_cfg8_10min.gif]]
[[File:einstein_fs_cfg8_10min.gif]]


Now we repeat for an 1hr observation:
We can repeat the simulation, this time for an 1 hr observation:


<source lang="python">
<source lang="python">
Line 76: Line 96:
</source>
</source>


Which should look something like: [[File:einstein_fs_cfg8_1hr.gif]]
The result should look something like: [[File:einstein_fs_cfg8_1hr.gif]]


Finally, two Early Science simulations, using the extended configuration. One 10min simulation:
Next, we can see the result of observing this model image with the Early Science extended antenna configuration. First we use a 10 min observation:


<source lang="python">
<source lang="python">
Line 94: Line 114:
which looks like this: [[File:einstein_es_extended_10min.gif]]
which looks like this: [[File:einstein_es_extended_10min.gif]]


and a 4hr simulation:
and next a 4 hr observation:


<source lang="python">
<source lang="python">
Line 111: Line 131:
'''Further experiments:'''
'''Further experiments:'''


Some more things to try:
Here are some more things to try.


An 8hr observation shows the improvement obtained by obtaining fuller uv-coverage in the full science array:
An 8 hr observation shows the improvement obtained by obtained by filling in uv-coverage.  Here we use the full science array configuration.
<source lang="python">
<source lang="python">
tget(simobserve)
tget(simobserve)
Line 128: Line 148:
Which should look something like: [[File:einstein_fs_cfg8_8hr.gif]]
Which should look something like: [[File:einstein_fs_cfg8_8hr.gif]]


An attempt to make a higher resolution image shows what happens when short spacings are missing in the configuration.
We can simulate an observation using an extended configuration to achieve high spatial resolution.  In this case there are no short spacings and we will see the drastic effects of missing short spacings.
Configuration 16 has a 0.17x0.15 beam, still better than Nyquist sampling of the model image (which has 0.043" pixels).
We select configuration 16, which has a 0.17x0.15 beam, still better than Nyquist sampling of the model image (which has 0.043" pixels). The lack of short spacings in the configuration leads to poorly sampled structure on large spatial scales.  
However, the lack of short spacings in the configuration leads to poorly sampled structure on large spatial scales. In practice, one would need to combine these observations with a set in a more compact configuration (such as 8) to sample both the large
and small spatial structures.


<source lang="python">
<source lang="python">
Line 146: Line 164:


The result is: [[File:einstein_fs_cfg16_1hr.gif]]
The result is: [[File:einstein_fs_cfg16_1hr.gif]]
In practice, one would need to combine observations using this configuration with a set in a more compact configuration (such as 8) to sample both the large and small spatial structures.


{{Simulations Intro 4.0}}
{{Simulations Intro 4.0}}
{{Checked 4.0.0}}
{{Checked 4.0.0}}

Revision as of 21:42, 9 November 2012

Simulating Observations in CASA

This guide is applicable to CASA version 4.0. For simulation instructions for older versions of CASA see: Einstein-Face (CASA 3.4).

Simulations using non-science images: the face of Einstein

simobserve can be used to simulate an observation of any digitized image, and simanalyze can be used to image and analyze the data from that simulated observation. These toy models can be particularly useful for examining the effects of varying uv-coverage on image fidelity. In this example we use a photo of Albert Einstein as the input model.

We start with a JPG image of Einstein's face. simobserve likes input images in FITS format, so we used Gimp to convert the file. (Instructions to Convert jpg to fits.) The original image is shown below. You can grab the converted FITS file directly here or from the Simulation Inputs CASA Guide page.

Prepare inputs for simobserve and simanalyze

We will start with a 10 minute observation using one of the "full science" antenna configurations. Inputs to simobserve and simanalyze are given below. The integration time (300 s) is set much longer than we would see in a real ALMA observation (1 to 10 s) to speed the computation. We set the angular size of the image to 0.043 arcsecond pixels with the incell parameter, ensuring that only one pointing is needed to map the whole image area. The image coordinates are set to a position near the Chandra Deep Field South.

# simobserve is used to simulate the observation
default('simobserve')
# Full science, configuration 08, 10 minutes
project = 'fs_cfg8_10m'  
skymodel = 'Einstein.fits'
indirection = 'J2000 03h30m00 -28d00m00'
incell = '0.043arcsec'
incenter = '245GHz'
inwidth = '2GHz'
setpointings = T
integration = '300s'
mapsize = ['1arcmin','1arcmin']
maptype = 'hexagonal'
pointingspacing = '1arcmin'
graphics = 'both'
obsmode = 'int'
antennalist =  "alma.out08.cfg"
totaltime = '600s'
thermalnoise = ""
simobserve()

An aside about antenna configurations: ALMA will observe with many different array configurations. In our simulations we can specify which antenna configuration to use with the antennalist parameter. Your CASA distribution comes with a set of antenna configurations. You can locate the configurations like so:

CASA <49>: print os.getenv('CASAPATH').sp lit(' ')[0] + '/data/alma/simmos/'
/usr/lib64/casapy/stable/data/alma/simmos/ 
CASA <50>: ls /usr/lib64/casapy/stable/data/alma/simmos/
aca_cycle1.cfg            alma.out05.cfg  alma.out21.cfg  pdbi-c.cfg
aca.i.cfg                 alma.out06.cfg  alma.out22.cfg  pdbi-d.cfg
aca.ns.cfg                alma.out07.cfg  alma.out23.cfg  sma.compact.cfg
aca.tp.cfg                alma.out08.cfg  alma.out24.cfg  sma.compact.n.cfg
alma.cycle0.compact.cfg   alma.out09.cfg  alma.out25.cfg  sma.extended.cfg
alma.cycle0.extended.cfg  alma.out10.cfg  alma.out26.cfg  sma.subcompact.cfg
alma_cycle1_1.cfg         alma.out11.cfg  alma.out27.cfg  sma.vextended.cfg
alma_cycle1_2.cfg         alma.out12.cfg  alma.out28.cfg  vla.a.cfg
alma_cycle1_3.cfg         alma.out13.cfg  carma.a.cfg     vla.b.cfg
alma_cycle1_4.cfg         alma.out14.cfg  carma.b.cfg     vla.bna.cfg
alma_cycle1_5.cfg         alma.out15.cfg  carma.c.cfg     vla.c.cfg
alma_cycle1_6.cfg         alma.out16.cfg  carma.d.cfg     vla.cnb.cfg
alma.out01.cfg            alma.out17.cfg  carma.e.cfg     vla.d.cfg
alma.out02.cfg            alma.out18.cfg  meerkat.cfg     vla.dnc.cfg
alma.out03.cfg            alma.out19.cfg  pdbi-a.cfg      WSRT.cfg
alma.out04.cfg            alma.out20.cfg  pdbi-b.cfg

Now back to the simulation. Execute simanalyze with the following parameters:

# simanalyze is used to take the simulation output, and provide helpful plots
default('simanalyze')
project = 'fs_cfg8_10m'
image = T
vis = project+'.alma.out08.ms'  
imsize = [300,300]
cell = '0.043arcsec'
niter = 2000
weighting = 'natural'
analyze = F
overwrite = T
simanalyze()

The output image should have a clean beam of 0.62"x0.56" and look something like:

We can repeat the simulation, this time for an 1 hr observation:

tget(simobserve)
# Full science, configuration 08, 1 hour
project = 'fs_cfg8_1hr'  
totaltime = '3600s'
simobserve()
tget(simanalyze)
project = 'fs_cfg8_1hr'
vis = project+'.alma.out08.ms'
simanalyze()

The result should look something like:

Next, we can see the result of observing this model image with the Early Science extended antenna configuration. First we use a 10 min observation:

tget(simobserve)
project = 'es_extended_10m'
antennalist = "alma.cycle0.extended.cfg"
totaltime = '600s'
simobserve()
tget(simanalyze)
project = 'es_extended_10m'
vis = project+'.alma.cycle0.extended.ms'
simanalyze()

which looks like this:

and next a 4 hr observation:

tget(simobserve)
project = 'es_extended_4hr'
totaltime = '14400s'
simobserve()
tget(simanalyze)
project = 'es_extended_4hr'
vis = project+'.alma.cycle0.extended.ms'
simanalyze()

which looks like this:

Further experiments:

Here are some more things to try.

An 8 hr observation shows the improvement obtained by obtained by filling in uv-coverage. Here we use the full science array configuration.

tget(simobserve)
antennalist = "alma.out08.cfg"
project = 'fs_cfg8_8hr'
totaltime = '28800s'
simobserve()
tget(simanalyze)
project = 'fs_cfg8_8hr'
vis = project+'.alma.out08.ms'
simanalyze()

Which should look something like:

We can simulate an observation using an extended configuration to achieve high spatial resolution. In this case there are no short spacings and we will see the drastic effects of missing short spacings. We select configuration 16, which has a 0.17x0.15 beam, still better than Nyquist sampling of the model image (which has 0.043" pixels). The lack of short spacings in the configuration leads to poorly sampled structure on large spatial scales.

tget(simobserve)
antennalist = "alma.out16.cfg"
project = 'fs_cfg16_1hr'
totaltime = '3600s'
simobserve()
tget(simanalyze)
project = 'fs_cfg16_1hr'
vis = project+'.alma.out16.ms'
simanalyze()

The result is:

In practice, one would need to combine observations using this configuration with a set in a more compact configuration (such as 8) to sample both the large and small spatial structures.

Simulating Observations in CASA

Last checked on CASA Version 4.0.0.