VLA Hybrid Array Simulation

From CASA Guides
Jump to navigationJump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Simulating low-declination sources with the VLA

Historically, VLA has offered "hybrid" configurations e.g. BnA, with extension on the north-south arm, so that sources at low declination achieve a rounder synthesized beam than they would with the standard configurations.

more words here describing the images: regular D vs DnC at dec=-30

Vlab 30s d.vla.d.observe.pngVlab 30s.vla.dnc.observe.png

more words about how in principle one can combine some D and some C to recreate what one had with DnC

Example

I wanted a model image that was public, easy for the user to obtain, actually radio wavelength as opposed to using e.g. a spitzer image, had good spatial dynamic range to start with, and was interesting, so I chose this but I don't know if its the best - if you think something with a bunch of compact structure which will get imaged elongated would be more illustrative, please suggest something. This VLASS has B+C+D originally, so arguably has all relevant spatial scales before we run this new simulation.

Here is 2h at transit in C, 2h in D, \\ 2h in CnD, and 1h in D plus 1d in C (commands below)

Vla.4panel.attempt1.png

There's clearly a problem with the D plus C clean - I'll look more into it - the skymodel is >2x the PB, so its not an edge effect from the simulation, but it might be insufficient uv coverage in 2x1h snapshots, both at transit.

These are noise-free - should we add thermal noise? I'll run that next to compare. Sometimes noise-free simulations get unstable in the clean because they have unrealistic properties.

I didn't apply any relative weighting between the D an C visibilities, nor did I apply any tapers. Should we do such things?

# 2h CnD
simobserve "vlab_30s",skymodel="snr.fits",antennalist="vla.dnc.cfg",thermalnoise="",verbose=True,incenter="1.4GHz",inwidth="200MHz",indirection="J2000 18h35m00s -30d00m00s",mapsize="15arcsec"
simanalyze "vlab_30s",analyze=True,imsize=2000,niter=5000,threshold="0.3Jy"

# 1hC 
simobserve "vlab_30s_cd",skymodel="snr.fits",antennalist="vla.c.cfg",thermalnoise="",verbose=True,incenter="1.4GHz",inwidth="200MHz",indirection="J2000 18h35m00s -30d00m00s",mapsize="15arcsec",totaltime="3600s"
# 1hD in the same directory
simobserve "vlab_30s_cd",skymodel="snr.fits",antennalist="vla.d.cfg",thermalnoise="",verbose=True,incenter="1.4GHz",inwidth="200MHz",indirection="J2000 18h35m00s -30d00m00s",mapsize="15arcsec",totaltime="3600s"
# image and analyze together (simanalyze will automatically concat the two MS it finds in the sim directory
simanalyze "vlab_30s_cd",analyze=True,imsize=2000,niter=5000,threshold="0.2Jy"

After simanalyze I cleaned manually with masks - we could provide the masks, or just use the un-masked clean in simanalyze - it doesn't look that much worse for DnC:

Vlab 30s.manclean.auto.png

but it does for the concatted 1hC plus 1hD:

Vlab 30s cd.manclean.auto.png