CARMA spectral line mosaic M99 3.1: Difference between revisions

From CASA Guides
Jump to navigationJump to search
Mthornle (talk | contribs)
Mthornle (talk | contribs)
Line 170: Line 170:
unzoom.
unzoom.


[[Image:M99plotms3.png.png|thumb|Zoom on last few scans of 3c273 and 3c274.]]
[[Image:M99plotms3.png|thumb|Zoom on last few scans of 3c273 and 3c274.]]


Next note that the first two scans on 3c273 and the last scan on
Next note that the first two scans on 3c273 and the last scan on

Revision as of 18:53, 13 May 2010

Overview

This tutorial describes the data reduction for CO (1-0) data observed toward the galaxy M99 (NGC 4254) using CARMA. These data were kindly provided by the CARMA STING team and should not be used for scientific purposes. More information about STING and these data in particular can be found in Rahman et al. (2010) and CARMA STING webpage.

In this tutorial we follow common CARMA practice to utilize a wide band (500 MHz) spectral window to calibrate narrow band (6 MHz) spectral windows in order to achieve better signal-to-noise.

The tutorial below assumes that you have followed the initial miriad data reduction and export to fits steps described at Importing_Data_from_MIRIAD.

A tar file of the resulting fits files can be downloaded from http://casa.nrao.edu/Data/CARMA/M99/M99_CARMA.fits.tar

After downloading, unpack the data in the directory you will be working in with

tar -xvf M99_CARMA.fits.tar

this will create a directory called fits.

Import fits files

Below we show an example of creating a python dictionary and using "for" loops in python to run importuvfits multiple times, and then use the output as the input to the concat task.

myfiles = []
for i in range(4,7):
        msfile = "c0104I"+str(i)+".ms"
        importuvfits(fitsfile="fits/c0104I."+str(i)+".fits",
                     vis=msfile)
        myfiles.append(msfile)
concat(vis=myfiles,concatvis='c0104I',timesort=True)
listobs(vis='c0104I')

Look at the logger output. Notice that the CARMA data comes into CASA with antenna names that are numbers and that CASA also creates an antenna id number for each antenna (it also creates id numbers for fields and spw). Both the antenna name and id can be used to identify an antenna, which is very confusing if both are numbers -- but not the same number. The python commands below will append the antenna names with CA to more easily distinguish them from their ids. ALMA will already have antenna names that are strings, as does the EVLA. This step is only needed for data that comes into CASA via importuvfits.

tb.open("c0104I/ANTENNA",nomodify=False)
namelist=tb.getcol("NAME").tolist()
for i in range(len(namelist)):
	name = 'CA'+namelist[i]
	print ' Changing '+namelist[i]+' to '+name
	namelist[i]=name

tb.putcol("NAME",namelist)
tb.close()
listobs(vis='c0104I')
 Fields: 22
   ID   Code Name         RA            Decl           Epoch   nVis   
   0         MARS         09:15:50.0585 +17.21.03.8918 J2000   9450   
   1         3C273        12:29:06.7000 +02.03.08.5980 J2000   60480  
   2         NGC4254      12:18:47.8090 +14.24.13.9342 J2000   24570  
   3         NGC4254      12:18:49.6000 +14.24.13.9342 J2000   24570  
   4         NGC4254      12:18:51.3910 +14.24.13.9342 J2000   24570  
   5         NGC4254      12:18:52.2865 +14.24.36.4672 J2000   24570  
   6         NGC4254      12:18:50.4955 +14.24.36.4672 J2000   24570  
   7         NGC4254      12:18:48.7045 +14.24.36.4672 J2000   24570  
   8         NGC4254      12:18:46.9135 +14.24.36.4672 J2000   24570  
   9         NGC4254      12:18:46.0179 +14.24.59.0000 J2000   24570  
   10        NGC4254      12:18:47.8090 +14.24.59.0000 J2000   24570  
   11        NGC4254      12:18:49.6000 +14.24.59.0000 J2000   24570  
   12        NGC4254      12:18:51.3910 +14.24.59.0000 J2000   24570  
   13        NGC4254      12:18:53.1821 +14.24.59.0000 J2000   24570  
   14        NGC4254      12:18:52.2865 +14.25.21.5328 J2000   24570  
   15        NGC4254      12:18:50.4955 +14.25.21.5328 J2000   24570  
   16        NGC4254      12:18:48.7045 +14.25.21.5328 J2000   24570  
   17        NGC4254      12:18:46.9135 +14.25.21.5328 J2000   22680  
   18        NGC4254      12:18:47.8090 +14.25.44.0658 J2000   22680  
   19        NGC4254      12:18:49.6000 +14.25.44.0658 J2000   22680  
   20        NGC4254      12:18:51.3910 +14.25.44.0658 J2000   22680  
   21        3C274        12:30:49.4230 +12.23.28.0440 J2000   45360  
    (nVis = Total number of time/baseline visibilities per field) 
 Spectral Windows:  (3 unique spectral windows and 1 unique polarization setups)
   SpwID  Chans Frame Ch1(MHz)    ChanWid(kHz)TotBW(kHz)  Ref(MHz)    Corrs
   0          15 LSRK  113978.067  31250       468750      113978.067  RR  
   1          63 LSRK  114289.671  976.5625    61523.4375  114289.671  RR  
   2          63 LSRK  114341.036  976.5625    61523.4375  114341.036  RR  
 The SOURCE table is empty: see the FIELD table
 Antennas: 15:
   ID   Name  Station   Diam.    Long.         Lat.         
   0    CA1     ANT1      10.4 m   -116.45.01.0  +37.13.43.4  
   1    CA2     ANT2      10.4 m   -116.59.48.3  +37.52.00.3  
   2    CA3     ANT3      10.4 m   -120.06.43.6  +37.35.02.8  
   3    CA4     ANT4      10.4 m   -119.38.33.8  +38.26.22.2  
   4    CA5     ANT5      10.4 m   -119.13.25.0  +35.03.23.4  
   5    CA6     ANT6      10.4 m   -119.06.39.2  +38.54.24.4  
   6    CA7     ANT7      6.1  m   -119.30.34.9  +36.58.55.6  
   7    CA8     ANT8      6.1  m   -118.08.34.0  +37.16.45.8  
   8    CA9     ANT9      6.1  m   -118.46.59.9  +36.48.41.4  
   9    CA10    ANT10     6.1  m   -118.29.04.6  +36.03.45.6  
   10   CA11    ANT11     6.1  m   -118.48.40.9  +37.15.57.8  
   11   CA12    ANT12     6.1  m   -119.33.27.5  +36.06.46.1  
   12   CA13    ANT13     6.1  m   -118.31.43.5  +37.05.19.4  
   13   CA14    ANT14     6.1  m   -118.13.18.7  +36.50.34.6  
   14   CA15    ANT15     6.1  m   -117.23.50.2  +36.25.48.2  
Observing Strategy:

Bandpass, Gain, and Flux calibrator: 3c273 field id=1
Secondary Gain Calibrator 3C274 field id=21
Extra flux calibrator Mars field id=0

The target mosaic is in field ids 2~20

There is one wideband channel (spw=0) and two narrow band channels
(spw=1,2)

Initial Inspection and Flagging

First, flag edge channels:

flagdata(vis='c0104I',mode='manualflag',selectdata=True,spw='0:0~1;13~14')
flagdata(vis='c0104I',mode='manualflag',selectdata=True,spw='1~2:0~1;61~62')

Let's look at the wide band channel on all sources:

Amplitude as a function of time for all sources, with each field shown in a different color.
plotms(vis='c0104I',xaxis='time',yaxis='amp',field='1~21', spw='0',
      avgchannel='15')

Click "Display" tab in the plotms GUI and select "Colorize by: Field", then click the plot button.


There are a few things to notice:

First there is some very noticeably bad target data near the end of the observation. Use the zoom button to zoom in on the bad timerange and then click the Mark Region icon and put a box over a modest number of the offending high points, and then press the Locate button.

Information about the located points will display to the terminal (not the Log Messages window). This will tell you that the offending telescope is antenna name=CA13 (id=12) and that the field-ids are 2~11. Looking at the plot the bad time range is 05:43:00~05:54:00.

Zoom on bad target data, with small marked region.

Click the "Clear Regions" button, and then the "house" button to unzoom.

Zoom on last few scans of 3c273 and 3c274.

Next note that the first two scans on 3c273 and the last scan on 3c273 show some low points. Also the last scan on 3c274 shows low points. Again use zoom, mark, and locate to see if you can see a pattern.

The first two scans on 3c273 don't show a particular pattern -- no particular antenna or individual time range appears to be responsible. This is usually a good indication that it cannot be calibrated out. Also note that it is unlikely that the target data in between is good, though this is not obvious because the target is weak. However, 3c274 does look ok, before the second 3c273 scan. Unfortunately, there is no way to calibrate the first target scans even if they are good, with no calibrator scan to precede them. For now we will flag 3c273 scans and the target in that timerange.

Last scan on 3c273 appears to be antenna CA7, scan 272 Last scan on 3c274 appears to be antenna CA8, scan 255

Looking at the lowest points on all the 3c273 scans, baseline CA2-CA8 appears low, we will also wait to see if this calibrates out.

We will flag the narrow band channels wherever we see problems in wideband. You can either make separate plotting commands, or combine as below. To demonstrate different possibilities we use timerange to identify some data, and scan number others.

flagdata(vis='c0104I',spw='0~2',
	 antenna=['CA13','','CA7','CA8'],
	 field=['2~11','1~20','1','21'],
	 scan=['','','272','255'],
	 timerange=['05:43:00~05:54:00','00:25:00~00:55:00','',''])

Note that each of these flagging commands could have been written out separately, but combining them into one command will run much faster than the combined time of multiple calls as the data only have to be searched once.

Set the Absolute Flux Scale

Often for millimeter observations, the absolute flux scale is determined by observing a planet and using a model of its flux as a function of baseline length (most planets are not point sources at mm frequencies using typical arrays). This is because the flux of planets change in a mostly predictable way (depending primarily on distance at any given time) than quasars. CASA does not yet have this functionality (we expect it for the next release). The flux of 3c273 is inserted from CARMA flux monitoring (which used the Mars observation to derive the 3c273 flux).

setjy(vis='c0104I', field='3C273',fluxdensity=[17.8,0.,0.,0.], spw='0~2')

Calibrate the Wideband Bandpass

Lets start by looking at the bandpass calibrator's phase as a fuction of channel for the wideband data.

File:.png
plotms(vis='c0104I',xaxis='channel',yaxis='phase',
       field='1',spw='0',antenna='CA1',
       avgtime='1e8',avgscan=T)

Select colorize by antenna2, and select "custom" for unflagged points, and then raise the style to 3 and you will see that the phase does not change a great deal on individual baselines over the wide band channel (spw=0). This means that averaging over some channels will not introduce significant closure errors. Check other antennas if you like.

Now look at the phase as a function of time. With avgtime a large number, but no avgscan=T, this command will show the average phase per scan. Since the cache changes, the colorize option changes too. You will have to select these again as above.

File:.png
plotms(vis='c0104I',xaxis='time',yaxis='phase',
       field='1',spw='0',
       antenna='CA1',
       avgchannel='15',avgtime='1e8')

Here you see significant variation with time. This is not surprising as the bandpass calibrator was observed over a fairly long period of time-- 6 hours, it is important to calibrate the phase before solving for the bandpass. We choose a fairly narrow channel range since the bandpass phase as a function of frequency has not been taken out yet (though for these data it is quite well behaved).

gaincal(vis='c0104I',caltable='c0104I.bpphase_widecal',
        field='1',spw='0:5~9',
        refant='CA9',calmode='p',solint='inf',minsnr=2.0)

The use of solint='inf' here without setting combine will get one solution per scan.

Look at the solutions

File:.png
plotcal(caltable='c0104I.bpphase_widecal',
        xaxis='time',yaxis='phase',
        iteration='antenna',subplot=321)

Note the phase drift is > 100 degrees on some antennas -- this is why it would not have been appropriate to vector average these data into one bp solution before taking out the phase. Use the "Next" button to page through all antennas.

Having done a preliminary phase solution we can now combine all the 3C273 scans into one bandpass solution, note the default combine parameter is combine='scan'.

bandpass(vis='c0104I',caltable='c0104I.bp_widecal',
         interp='',field='1',spw='0',
         bandtype='B',solint='inf',
         refant='CA9',solnorm=F,
         gaintable=['c0104I.bpphase_widecal'],
         spwmap=[[]])
File:.png
plotcal(caltable='c0104I.bp_widecal',xaxis='chan',yaxis='amp',
        iteration='antenna',subplot=321)
File:.png
plotcal(caltable='c0104I.bp_widecal',xaxis='chan',yaxis='phase',
        iteration='antenna',subplot=321)

Calibrate the Wideband Gains

Now resolve for phase and also amplitude while applying the bandpass solutions, for both calibrators 3c273 and 3c274. We will not use the first gain solution again.

gaincal(vis='c0104I',caltable='c0104I.phase_widecal',
        field='1,21',spw='0',
        refant='CA9',calmode='p',solint='int',minsnr=2.0,
        gaintable=['c0104I.bp_widecal'],
        spwmap=[[]])
File:.png
plotcal(caltable='c0104I.phase_widecal',xaxis='time',yaxis='phase',
        iteration='antenna',subplot=321,plotrange=[0,0,-180,180])

Note the significant phase variation within a single scan. If we used an average phase in the next step to derive the amplitude solutions, it would decorrelate the subsequent amplitude corrections.

gaincal(vis='c0104I',caltable='c0104I.amp_widecal',
        field='1,21',spw='0',
        refant='CA9',calmode='ap',solint='inf',minsnr=2.0,
        gaintable=['c0104I.bp_widecal','c0104I.phase_widecal'],
        spwmap=[[]])
File:.png
plotcal(caltable='c0104I.amp_widecal',xaxis='time',yaxis='amp',
        iteration='antenna',subplot=321)

Note the different gains for 3c273 scans and 3c274 scans, this just reflects that the two calibrators have different strengths.

Next plot the phase from the amplitude solutions -- this will be the residual phase after taking out the integration-time based solutions. This gives a good idea of the residual phase noise. If this is more than a few degrees, the cause should be investigated. Note that the scatter for 3c274 is larger than 3c273 -- this reflects that 3c273 is significantly weaker and thus has less S/N.

File:.png
plotcal(caltable='c0104I.amp_widecal',xaxis='time',yaxis='phase',
        iteration='antenna',subplot=321)

Here we re-run the phase only calibration but now getting one solution per scan to apply later to the target. An alternative would be to smooth the integration time phase calibration table, but this is a bit simpler.

gaincal(vis='c0104I',caltable='c0104I.phase_wide_inf_cal',
        field='1,21',spw='0',
        refant='CA9',calmode='p',solint='inf',minsnr=2.0,
        gaintable=['c0104I.bp_widecal'],
        spwmap=[[]])
File:.png
plotcal(caltable='c0104I.phase_wide_inf_cal',xaxis='time',yaxis='phase',
        iteration='antenna',subplot=321,plotrange=[0,0,-180,180])

This is a very important plot to look at carefully as these are the phase solutions that will be applied to the target. Note that the phases for 3c273 and 3c274 are very similar, but not exactly the same. Unfortunately we can not color by field here to make it easier to see.


Calibrate the Narrow Band Bandpasses

Solve for narrow band bandpasses, applying wideband phase and amplitude corrections. Because there are 3 spw in the data, you must set a placeholder for all three in spwmap, even though we are only solving for 2 of them.

bandpass(vis='c0104I',caltable='c0104I.bp_narrowcal',
         interp='',field='1',spw='1,2',
         bandtype='B',solint='inf',
         refant='CA9',solnorm=F,
         gaintable=['c0104I.phase_widecal','c0104I.amp_widecal'],
         spwmap=[[0,0,0],[0,0,0]])
File:.png
plotcal(caltable='c0104I.bp_narrowcal',xaxis='chan',yaxis='amp',
        iteration='antenna',subplot=331)
File:.png
plotcal(caltable='c0104I.bp_narrowcal',xaxis='chan',yaxis='phase',
        iteration='antenna',subplot=331)

Calibrate Absolute Flux

fluxscale(vis='c0104I',caltable='c0104I.amp_widecal',
          fluxtable='c0104I.fluxcal',reference='1')
Flux density for 3C274 in SpW=0 is: 3.11626 +/- 0.0146614 (SNR = 212.549, nAnt= 15)

Check that the flux table looks as expected: the amplitude table scaled by correct flux.

File:.png
plotcal(caltable='c0104I.fluxcal',xaxis='chan',yaxis='amp',
        iteration='antenna',subplot=331)

Applycal and Inspect

We run applycal separately for the wide and narrow band data so we can apply the appropriate bandpass tables.

applycal(vis='c0104I',field='1',spw='0',
        gaintable=['c0104I.bp_widecal','c0104I.phase_widecal','c0104I.fluxcal'],
        spwmap=[[],[],[]],gainfield=['1','1','1'])
applycal(vis='c0104I',field='1',spw='1,2',
        gaintable=['c0104I.bp_narrowcal','c0104I.phase_widecal','c0104I.fluxcal'],
        spwmap=[[],[0,0,0],[0,0,0]],gainfield=['1','1','1'])
applycal(vis='c0104I',field='21',spw='0',
        gaintable=['c0104I.bp_widecal','c0104I.phase_widecal','c0104I.fluxcal'],
        spwmap=[[],[],[]],gainfield=['1','21','21'])
applycal(vis='c0104I',field='21',spw='1,2',
        gaintable=['c0104I.bp_narrowcal','c0104I.phase_widecal','c0104I.fluxcal'],
        spwmap=[[],[0,0,0],[0,0,0]],gainfield=['1','21','21'])

For the target we will use both gain calibrators, so which ever is closest in time will be applied to the target.

applycal(vis='c0104I',field='2~20',spw='0',
        gaintable=['c0104I.bp_widecal','c0104I.phase_wide_inf_cal','c0104I.fluxcal'],
        spwmap=[[],[],[]],gainfield=['1','1,21','1,21'])
applycal(vis='c0104I',field='2~20',spw='1,2',
        gaintable=['c0104I.bp_narrowcal','c0104I.phase_wide_inf_cal','c0104I.fluxcal'],
        spwmap=[[],[0,0,0],[0,0,0]],gainfield=['1','1,21','1,21'])
File:.png
plotms(vis='c0104I',xaxis='frequency',ydatacolumn='corrected',
       field='1',avgtime='1e8')
File:.png
plotms(vis='c0104I',xaxis='time',yaxis='amp',ydatacolumn='corrected',
       field='1~21',spw='0',
       avgchannel='15',avgtime='1e8')

Deconvolution and Imaging

File:.png
plotms(vis='c0104I',xaxis='velocity',yaxis='amp',ydatacolumn='corrected',
       field='2',spw='1~2',avgtime='1e8')

in plotms in the "trans" tab set the CO rest frequency (115271.2 MHz) in order to see the velocity range of the narrow band channels. Unfortunately the individual pointings are a bit too weak to see the UV vector averaged CO signal but you can at least see the observed velocity range.


Go to display tab and chose colorize by spw. Notice that the edge channels are a bit noisy -- especially a concern in the overlap region. We will exclude these below.

clean(vis='c0104I',imagename='M99_cube_nearest',spw='1~2:3~59',field='2~20',
      phasecenter='11',
      cell='1.0arcsec',imsize=500,
      mode='velocity',start='2268km/s',width='10.0km/s',
      interpolation='nearest',
      imagermode='mosaic',cyclefactor=2,
      restfreq='115.2712GHz',interactive=F,
      mask='../M99_cube.mask',
      minpb=0.1,pbcor=F,
      niter=5000,threshold='40mJy')


Image Analysis

immoments(imagename='M99_cube_nearest.image',moments=[0],axis='spectral',
          excludepix=[-100,0.075],outfile='M99_cube.moment0')
immoments(imagename='M99_cube_nearest.image',moments=[1],axis='spectral',
          excludepix=[-100,0.125],outfile='M99_cube.moment1')

Last checked on CASA Version 3.0.2 (r11631).

--Crystal Brogan