NGC3256Band3 for CASA 3.3: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 387: | Line 387: | ||
field='1037*', avgtime='1E6', avgscan=T, coloraxis='baseline', iteraxis='antenna') | field='1037*', avgtime='1E6', avgscan=T, coloraxis='baseline', iteraxis='antenna') | ||
</source> | </source> | ||
Bandpass calibration, using the first gaincal on-the-fly | |||
<source lang="python"> | <source lang="python"> | ||
Line 392: | Line 394: | ||
bandpass(vis = 'ngc3256_line.ms', caltable = 'ngc3256.B1', gaintable = 'ngc3256.G1', | bandpass(vis = 'ngc3256_line.ms', caltable = 'ngc3256.B1', gaintable = 'ngc3256.G1', | ||
field = '1037*', minblperant=3, minsnr=1, solint='inf', | field = '1037*', minblperant=3, minsnr=1, solint='inf', | ||
bandtype='B', fillgaps=1, refant = 'PM03', solnorm = F) | bandtype='B', fillgaps=1, refant = 'PM03', solnorm = F) | ||
</source> | |||
<source lang="python"> | |||
# In CASA | |||
plotcal(caltable = 'ngc3256.B1', xaxis="freq",yaxis="phase", spw="", | |||
subplot=212, overplot=False, plotrange = [0,0,-70,70], | |||
plotsymbol='.', timerange="") | |||
plotcal(caltable = 'ngc3256.B1', xaxis="freq",yaxis="amp", spw="", | |||
subplot=211, overplot=False, | |||
figfile='bandpass.B1.png', plotsymbol='.', timerange="") | |||
</source> | |||
[MOVE THIS SOMEWHERE ELSE?] | |||
Get flux density for Titan using the Butler-JPL-Horizons 2010 model. The flux density of Titan is 296 mJy | |||
<source lang="python"> | |||
# In CASA | |||
setjy(vis="ngc3256_line.ms", field="Titan", spw="", modimage="", | |||
scalebychan=False, fluxdensity=-1, | |||
standard="Butler-JPL-Horizons 2010") | |||
</source> | |||
Plot amplitude as function of uv distance for Titan for the remaining data. It looks unresolved | |||
<source lang="python"> | |||
# In CASA | |||
plotms(vis="ngc3256_line.ms", xaxis="uvdist", yaxis="amp", | |||
ydatacolumn="corrected", selectdata=True, field="Titan", | |||
spw="", averagedata=True, avgchannel="128", avgtime="", | |||
avgscan=True, avgbaseline=F) | |||
</source> | |||
== Gain calibration == | |||
Now do a new gaincal, using the bandpass on-the-fly | |||
<source lang="python"> | |||
# In CASA | |||
gaincal(vis = 'ngc3256_line.ms', caltable = 'ngc3256.G2', spw = | |||
'0:30~90,1:30~90,2:30~90,3:30~90', field = '1037*,Titan', | |||
solint= 'inf', selectdata=T, solnorm=False, refant = 'PM03', | |||
gaintable = ['ngc3256.B1'], calmode = 'ap') | |||
</source> | |||
Generate plots: | |||
<source lang="python"> | |||
# In CASA | |||
plotcal(caltable = 'ngc3256.G2', xaxis = 'time', yaxis = 'phase', | |||
poln='X', plotsymbol='o', plotrange = [0,0,-180,180], iteration | |||
= 'spw', figfile='phase_vs_time_XX.G2.png', subplot = 221) | |||
plotcal(caltable = 'ngc3256.G2', xaxis = 'time', yaxis = 'phase', | |||
poln='Y', plotsymbol='o', plotrange = [0,0,-180,180], iteration | |||
= 'spw', figfile='phase_vs_time_YY.G2.png', subplot = 221) | |||
plotcal(caltable = 'ngc3256.G2', xaxis = 'time', yaxis = 'amp', | |||
poln='X', plotsymbol='o', plotrange = [], iteration = 'spw', | |||
figfile='amp_vs_time_XX.G2.png', subplot = 221) | |||
plotcal(caltable = 'ngc3256.G2', xaxis = 'time', yaxis = 'amp', | |||
poln='Y', plotsymbol='o', plotrange = [], iteration = 'spw', | |||
figfile='amp_vs_time_YY.G2.png', subplot = 221) | |||
</source> | |||
<source lang="python"> | |||
# In CASA | |||
fluxscale( vis="ngc3256_line.ms", caltable="ngc3256.G2", | |||
fluxtable="ngc3256.G2.flux", reference="Titan", | |||
transfer="1037*", append=False) | |||
</source> | </source> |
Revision as of 15:09, 19 May 2011
Overview
[To be written by Eric]
Retrieving the Data
The data were taken in six different datasets over two consecutive nights: April 16-17, 2011. There are three datasets for April 16th and three for April 17th. Here we provide you with "starter" datasets, where we have taken the raw data in ALMA Science Data Model (ASDM) format and converted them to CASA Measurement Sets (MS). We did this using the importasdm task in CASA.
[What else are we going to do to the data we provide?]
Along with the Measurement Sets, we also provide the Tsys tables...[more]
You can download the data here: [Provide link to the raw .ms files in tar'd, gzip'd format]
Once the download has finished, unpack the file:
# In a terminal outside CASA
tar -xvf ngc3256band3.tgz
[Also provide links to the calibrated data (but maybe not here?)]
Initial inspection and a priori flagging
We start by defining an array 'basename' that includes the names of the six files used here. This will simplify the following steps by allowing us to loop through the files using a simple for-loop in python.
# In CASA
basename=["uid___A002_X1d54a1_X5","uid___A002_X1d54a1_X174","uid___A002_X1d54a1_X2e3","uid___A002_X1d5a20_X5","uid___A002_X1d5a20_X174","uid___A002_X1d5a20_X330"]
The usual first step is then to get some basic information about the data. We do this using the task listobs, which will output a detailed summary of each dataset supplied.
# In CASA
for name in basename:
listobs(vis=name+'.ms')
The output will be sent to the CASA logger. You will have to scroll up to see the individual output for each of the six datasets. Here is an example of the most relevant output for the first file in the list.
Fields: 3 ID Code Name RA Decl Epoch SrcId nVis 0 none 1037-295 10:37:16.0790 -29.34.02.8130 J2000 0 38759 1 none Titan 00:00:00.0000 +00.00.00.0000 J2000 1 16016 2 none NGC3256 10:27:51.6000 -43.54.18.0000 J2000 2 151249 (nVis = Total number of time/baseline visibilities per field) Spectral Windows: (9 unique spectral windows and 2 unique polarization setups) SpwID #Chans Frame Ch1(MHz) ChanWid(kHz)TotBW(kHz) Ref(MHz) Corrs 0 4 TOPO 184550 1500000 7500000 183300 I 1 128 TOPO 113211.988 15625 2000000 113204.175 XX YY 2 1 TOPO 114188.55 1796875 1796875 113204.175 XX YY 3 128 TOPO 111450.813 15625 2000000 111443 XX YY 4 1 TOPO 112427.375 1796875 1796875 111443 XX YY 5 128 TOPO 101506.187 15625 2000000 101514 XX YY 6 1 TOPO 100498.375 1796875 1796875 101514 XX YY 7 128 TOPO 103050.863 15625 2000000 103058.675 XX YY 8 1 TOPO 102043.05 1796875 1796875 103058.675 XX YY Sources: 48 ID Name SpwId RestFreq(MHz) SysVel(km/s) 0 1037-295 0 - - 0 1037-295 9 - - 0 1037-295 10 - - 0 1037-295 11 - - 0 1037-295 12 - - 0 1037-295 13 - - 0 1037-295 14 - - 0 1037-295 15 - - 0 1037-295 1 - - 0 1037-295 2 - - 0 1037-295 3 - - 0 1037-295 4 - - 0 1037-295 5 - - 0 1037-295 6 - - 0 1037-295 7 - - 0 1037-295 8 - - 1 Titan 0 - - 1 Titan 9 - - 1 Titan 10 - - 1 Titan 11 - - 1 Titan 12 - - 1 Titan 13 - - 1 Titan 14 - - 1 Titan 15 - - 1 Titan 1 - - 1 Titan 2 - - 1 Titan 3 - - 1 Titan 4 - - 1 Titan 5 - - 1 Titan 6 - - 1 Titan 7 - - 1 Titan 8 - - 2 NGC3256 0 - - 2 NGC3256 9 - - 2 NGC3256 10 - - 2 NGC3256 11 - - 2 NGC3256 12 - - 2 NGC3256 13 - - 2 NGC3256 14 - - 2 NGC3256 15 - - 2 NGC3256 1 - - 2 NGC3256 2 - - 2 NGC3256 3 - - 2 NGC3256 4 - - 2 NGC3256 5 - - 2 NGC3256 6 - - 2 NGC3256 7 - - 2 NGC3256 8 - - Antennas: 7: ID Name Station Diam. Long. Lat. 0 DV04 J505 12.0 m -067.45.18.0 -22.53.22.8 1 DV06 T704 12.0 m -067.45.16.2 -22.53.22.1 2 DV07 J510 12.0 m -067.45.17.8 -22.53.23.5 3 DV08 T703 12.0 m -067.45.16.2 -22.53.23.9 4 DV09 N602 12.0 m -067.45.17.4 -22.53.22.3 5 PM02 T701 12.0 m -067.45.18.8 -22.53.22.2 6 PM03 J504 12.0 m -067.45.17.0 -22.53.23.0
Note that there are more than four SpwIDs even though the observations were set up to have four spectral windows. The spectral line data themselves are found in spectral windows 1,3,5,7, which have 128 channels each. The first one is centered on the CO(1-0) emission line in the galaxy NGC 3256, and is our highest frequency spectral window. There is one additional spectral window (spw 3) in the Upper Side Band (USB), and two spectral windows (spw 5 and 7) in the Lower Side Band (LSB). These additional spectral windows are used to measure the continuum emission in the galaxy, and may contain other emission lines as well.
Spectral windows 2,4,6,8 are the respective channel averages. These are not useful for the offline data reduction. Spectral window 0 contains the WVR data. There are additional SpwIDs listed in the "Sources" section, which are not listed Spectral Windows" section. These are spectral windows reserved for the WVRs of each antenna (seven in our case). At the moment, all WVRs point to spw 0 which has nominal frequencies, so the additional spw's 9 to 15 are not used and can be ignored.
Another important thing to note is that the position of Titan is listed as 00:00:00.0000 +00.00.00.0000. This is obviously not correct, and is due to the fact that for ephemeris objects the positions are currently not stored in the asdm. This will be handled correctly in the near future, but at present we have to fix this ofline. We will fix the coordinates below by running the procedure fixplanet.
The first editing we will do is some a priori flagging. We will start by flagging the shadowed data and the autocorrelation data:
# In CASA
for name in basename:
flagdata(vis=name+".ms",flagbackup = F, mode = 'shadow')
flagautocorr(vis=name+".ms")
There are a number of scans in the data that were used by the online system for pointing calibration. These scans are no longer needed, and we can flag them easily by selecting on 'intent':
[FLAGGING HERE IS FINE, BUT IT WILL HAVE TO LOOP OVER THE MS's]
# In CASA
for name in basename:
flagdata(vis='ngc3256_line.ms', mode='manualflag', flagbackup = F, intent="*POINTING*")
Similarly, we can flag the scans corresponding to atmospheric calibration:
# In CASA
for name in basename:
flagdata(vis='ngc3256_line.ms', mode='manualflag', flagbackup = F, intent="*ATMOSPHERE*")
We will then store the current flagging state for each dataset using the flagmanager:
# In CASA
for name in basename:
flagmanager(vis = name+'.ms', mode = 'save', versionname = 'Apriori')
[Martin: Is there any reason you sometimes use double quotes and sometimes single?: No, that's just me being sloppy. We should use single quotes throughout, I think.]
Some initial flagging: For uid___A002_X1d54a1_X174.ms there is a outlying feature in spw=7, antenna DV04. This corresponds to scan 5 and 9, so we flag those data:
# In CASA
flagdata(vis='uid___A002_X1d54a1_X174.ms', mode='manualflag',
antenna='DV04', flagbackup = F, scan='5,9', spw='7')
Antenna DV07 shows large delays for the first three data sets. We correct this by calculating a K-type delay calibration table with gencal. The parameters are the delays measured in ns, first cycling over polarization product and then over spectral window, thus giving eight numbers in total. Before creating these tables, delete any existing version
# In CASA
for i in range(3): # loop over the first three ms's
name=basename[i]
os.system('rm -rf '+name+'_del.K')
gencal(vis=name+".ms", caltable=name+"_del.K",
caltype="sbd", antenna="DV07", pol="X,Y", spw='1,3,5,7',
parameter=[0.99, 1.10, -3.0, -3.0, -3.05, -3.05, -3.05, -3.05])
We will apply these K tables to the data in the next section.
Tsys calibration and WVR Correction
First, we apply the delay correction table and the WVR calibration tables to the data. We do this in two steps, first cycling over the three data sets from the first day of observations, because we have to correct the delay error for DV07 for those data. For the last three data sets, taken during the second day, we do not need to correct the delays, so we just apply the WVR tables:
# In CASA
for i in range(3): # loop over the first three data sets
name=basename[i]
applycal(vis=name+".ms", flagbackup=F, spw='1,3,5,7',
interp='nearest', gaintable=[name+"_del.K",name+'.W'])
for i in range(3,6): # loop over the last three data sets
name=basename[i]
applycal(vis=name+".ms", flagbackup=F, spw='1,3,5,7',
interp='nearest', gaintable=name+'.W')
Now split out the data sets with delays and WVR tables applied. These data sets are given the extention "_K_WVR", to indicate that the delay tables and WVR tables have been applied.
# In CASA
for name in basename:
os.system('rm -rf '+name+'_K_WVR.ms*')
split(vis=name+".ms", outputvis=name+"_K_WVR.ms",
datacolumn='corrected')
Now, on the Tsys calibration...
[Talk about what each thing does and how we currently must use the un-concatenated data for each.]
First we will inspect the Tsys tables:
# In CASA
for name in basename:
plotcal(caltable="tsys_"+name+".cal", xaxis="freq", yaxis="amp",
spw="1,3,5,7", timerange="<2020", subplot=221, overplot=False,
iteration="spw", plotrange=[0, 0, 40, 180], plotsymbol=".",
figfile="tsys_per_spw"+name+".png")
Note that we only plot the spectral windows with the spectral line data, and we set timerange="<2020" because [WHY?] Everything looks fine in the plot files produced, so we apply the Tsys values and WVR corrections with applycal:
[DOES THAT MEAN WE ARE JUST PROVIDING THE WVR TABLES AS WELL, INSTEAD OF HAVING THEM GENERATE THEM? Yes we will provide the WVR tables. We don not want the users to use wvrgcal.]
Apply the Tsys tables. Do it for every field separately, so that the appropriate cal data are applied to the right fields. Explain field=field, gainfield=field
# In CASA
for name in basename:
for field in ['Titan','1037*','NGC*']:
applycal(vis=name+"_K_WVR.ms", spw='1,3,5,7', flagbackup=F, field=field, gainfield=field,
interp='nearest', gaintable=['tsys_'+name+'.cal'])
We then split out spectral windows 1,3,5,&7. This will get rid of the channel averaged spectral windows, and spw 0, which is the one for the WVR data.
[Most importantly, it will remove the "WVR placeholder" spws, which can cause problems in concat and split. I THINK THIS IS NO LONGER RELEVANT ]
# In CASA
for name in basename:
os.system('rm -rf '+name+'_line.ms*')
split(vis=name+"_K_WVR.ms", outputvis=name+"_line.ms",
datacolumn='corrected', spw='1,3,5,7')
The WVR and Tsys tables are now applied in the DATA column of the resultant measurement sets. The new data sets have the extension "_line", to indicate that these only contain the line data, and no longer carry the "channel average" spectral windows with them. These measurement sets therefore have four spectral windows.
Now we concatenate the six individual data sets to make one big measurement set. We define an array comvis that contains the names of the ms's we wish to concatenate, and then run the task concat.
# In CASA
comvis=[]
for name in basename:
comvis.append(name+"_line.ms")
os.system('rm -rf ngc3256_line.ms*')
concat(vis=comvis, concatvis="ngc3256_line.ms")
---More to come here---
[THESE FLAGGING COMMANDS WERE HIGHER UP, BUT I THINK THEY SHOULD BE MOVED BELOW CONCAT, MAYBE AFTER A BASIC PLOTMS]
Remove the noisy edge channels
# In CASA
flagdata(vis = 'ngc3256_line.ms', flagbackup = F, spw = ['*:0~10','*:125~127'])
Titan is our primary flux calibrator. However, for the second day of observations, Titan had moved to close to Saturn, and the rings move into the primary beam. [Check this be using plotms, plot amp vs. uvdist.]. We therefore flag the Titan scans for the second day:
# In CASA
flagdata(vis = 'ngc3256_line.ms', flagbackup = F,
timerange=">2011/04/16/12:00:00", field='Titan')
Now fix the position of Titan in the combined data set. The position of Titan is set to 00,00, but the following procedure will replace that with the position that the telescopes were actually pointing at and recalculates the uvw coordinates:
# In CASA
execfile(os.getenv("CASAPATH").split(' ')[0]+"/lib/python2.6/recipes/fixplanets.py")
fixplanets('ngc3256_line.ms', 'Titan', True)
...More data inspection...
Baselines with DV07 have very high amps in YY in the last spectral window:
# In CASA
flagdata(vis="ngc3256_line.ms", flagbackup=F, spw='3',
correlation='YY', mode="manualflag", selectdata=T,
antenna="DV07", timerange="")
Baselines with DV08 have very low amps for the last data set. Only for the last spectral window, and only YY
# In CASA
flagdata(vis="ngc3256_line.ms", flagbackup=F, spw='3',
correlation='YY', mode="manualflag", selectdata=T,
antenna="DV08", timerange=">2011/04/17/03:00:00")
Baselines with PM03 have low amps at 2011/04/17/02:15:00. Only for the first spectral window
# In CASA
flagdata(vis="ngc3256_line.ms", flagbackup=F, spw='0',
mode="manualflag", selectdata=T, antenna="PM03",
timerange="2011/04/17/02:15:00~02:15:50")
Baselines with PM03 have low amps at 2011/04/16/04:15:15. Only for the spectral windows 2 and 3
# In CASA
flagdata(vis="ngc3256_line.ms", flagbackup=F, spw='2,3',
mode="manualflag", selectdata=T, antenna="PM03",
timerange="2011/04/16/04:13:50~04:18:00")
Bandpass calibration
Before we do the bandpass calibration, we use gaincal to determine phase-only gaincal solutions for the bandpass calibrator, to correct for any phase variations with time. In these data, the phase calibrator and bandpass calibrator are the same source, so we just run this on 1037. For the solution interval we use solint='inf', which means that one gain solution will be determined for every scan. For our reference antenna, we choose PM03. The average of channels 40 to 80 is used to determine the antenna-based phase solutions. The output calibration table is named "ngc3256.G1".
# In CASA
gaincal(
vis = 'ngc3256_line.ms', caltable = 'ngc3256.G1', spw = '*:40~80', field = '1037*',
selectdata=T, solint= 'int', refant = 'PM03', calmode = 'p')
[IS SOLINT='INF' REALLY THE RIGHT THING TO DO? I WAS ALWAYS TAUGHT TO USE SOMETHING SHORT FOR THIS, LIKE THE INTEGRATION TIME...] -> Yes, changed to int
We check the time variations of the phases with plotcal. We make plot of the XX and YY polarization products separately and make different subplots for each of the spectal windows. This is done by selecting iteration of 'spw' and subplot=221. and generate png plots
# In CASA
plotcal(
caltable = 'ngc3256.G1', xaxis = 'time', yaxis = 'phase',
poln='X', plotsymbol='o', plotrange = [0,0,-180,180], iteration = 'spw',
figfile='phase_vs_time_XX.G1.png', subplot = 221)
# In CASA
plotcal(
caltable = 'ngc3256.G1', xaxis = 'time', yaxis = 'phase',
poln='Y', plotsymbol='o', plotrange = [0,0,-180,180], iteration = 'spw',
figfile='phase_vs_time_YY.G1.png', subplot = 221)
Now that we have a first measurement of the phase variations as function of time, we can determine the bandpass solutions with bandpass, using the phase calibration table 'on-the-fly'.
First, plot the phase as a function of frequency for 1037. We use avgscan=T and avgtime='1E6' to average in time over all scans, and coloraxis='baseline' is used to colorize by baseline.
# In CASA
plotms(vis='ngc3256_line.ms', xaxis='freq', yaxis='phase', selectdata=True,
field='1037*', avgtime='1E6', avgscan=T, coloraxis='baseline', iteraxis='antenna')
and the amplitudes
# In CASA
plotms(vis='ngc3256_line.ms', xaxis='freq', yaxis='amp', selectdata=True, spw='*:10~120',
field='1037*', avgtime='1E6', avgscan=T, coloraxis='baseline', iteraxis='antenna')
Bandpass calibration, using the first gaincal on-the-fly
# In CASA
bandpass(vis = 'ngc3256_line.ms', caltable = 'ngc3256.B1', gaintable = 'ngc3256.G1',
field = '1037*', minblperant=3, minsnr=1, solint='inf',
bandtype='B', fillgaps=1, refant = 'PM03', solnorm = F)
# In CASA
plotcal(caltable = 'ngc3256.B1', xaxis="freq",yaxis="phase", spw="",
subplot=212, overplot=False, plotrange = [0,0,-70,70],
plotsymbol='.', timerange="")
plotcal(caltable = 'ngc3256.B1', xaxis="freq",yaxis="amp", spw="",
subplot=211, overplot=False,
figfile='bandpass.B1.png', plotsymbol='.', timerange="")
[MOVE THIS SOMEWHERE ELSE?]
Get flux density for Titan using the Butler-JPL-Horizons 2010 model. The flux density of Titan is 296 mJy
# In CASA
setjy(vis="ngc3256_line.ms", field="Titan", spw="", modimage="",
scalebychan=False, fluxdensity=-1,
standard="Butler-JPL-Horizons 2010")
Plot amplitude as function of uv distance for Titan for the remaining data. It looks unresolved
# In CASA
plotms(vis="ngc3256_line.ms", xaxis="uvdist", yaxis="amp",
ydatacolumn="corrected", selectdata=True, field="Titan",
spw="", averagedata=True, avgchannel="128", avgtime="",
avgscan=True, avgbaseline=F)
Gain calibration
Now do a new gaincal, using the bandpass on-the-fly
# In CASA
gaincal(vis = 'ngc3256_line.ms', caltable = 'ngc3256.G2', spw =
'0:30~90,1:30~90,2:30~90,3:30~90', field = '1037*,Titan',
solint= 'inf', selectdata=T, solnorm=False, refant = 'PM03',
gaintable = ['ngc3256.B1'], calmode = 'ap')
Generate plots:
# In CASA
plotcal(caltable = 'ngc3256.G2', xaxis = 'time', yaxis = 'phase',
poln='X', plotsymbol='o', plotrange = [0,0,-180,180], iteration
= 'spw', figfile='phase_vs_time_XX.G2.png', subplot = 221)
plotcal(caltable = 'ngc3256.G2', xaxis = 'time', yaxis = 'phase',
poln='Y', plotsymbol='o', plotrange = [0,0,-180,180], iteration
= 'spw', figfile='phase_vs_time_YY.G2.png', subplot = 221)
plotcal(caltable = 'ngc3256.G2', xaxis = 'time', yaxis = 'amp',
poln='X', plotsymbol='o', plotrange = [], iteration = 'spw',
figfile='amp_vs_time_XX.G2.png', subplot = 221)
plotcal(caltable = 'ngc3256.G2', xaxis = 'time', yaxis = 'amp',
poln='Y', plotsymbol='o', plotrange = [], iteration = 'spw',
figfile='amp_vs_time_YY.G2.png', subplot = 221)
# In CASA
fluxscale( vis="ngc3256_line.ms", caltable="ngc3256.G2",
fluxtable="ngc3256.G2.flux", reference="Titan",
transfer="1037*", append=False)