Einstein-Face (CASA 3.2): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m moved Einstein-Face to Einstein-Face (CASA 3.2): Making page without CASA version in title to redirect to current CASA version page. |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 21:13, 17 May 2011
↵ Simulating Observations in CASA
Simulations using non-science images: the face of Einstein
Simdata can be used to simulate any digitized image. These toy models can be particularly useful for examining the effects of varying uv-coverage on image fidelity if the "truth" model is a familiar object or image. In this example (which is on page 13 of the ALMA Early Science Primer)we use the face of Albert Einstein.
In this example, we grabbed a JPG image of Einstein's face from the internet. Simdata likes input images in fits format, so we used Gimp to convert the file. (Instructions to Convert jpg to fits.) The original image is shown below. You can grab the converted fits file here from the Simulation Inputs CASA Guide page.
Prepare inputs for simdata
Start with the 10min full science observation. Inputs to simdata are given below. The integration time is set much longer than realistic (300s, compared to 1-10s in practice) to speed the computation. The map spacing is set to ensure that only one pointing is observed. The image scale is chosen to ensure good sampling of the beam, and the observation is pointed near the Chandra Deep Field South:
default 'simdata'
project = 'fs_cfg8_10m' # Full science, configuration 08, 10 minutes
modifymodel = T
skymodel = 'Einstein.fits'
indirection = 'J2000 03h30m00 -28d00m00'
incell = '0.043arcsec'
incenter = '245GHz'
inwidth = '2GHz'
setpointings = T
integration = '300s'
mapsize = ['1arcmin','1arcmin']
maptype = 'hexagonal'
pointingspacing = '1arcmin'
predict = T
graphics = 'both'
Antenna configuration: ALMA antenna configuration files are stored in a directory that depends on your CASA installation. To be sure of finding them, identify the CASAPATH variable using the os.getenv command, and pick the configuration you want. Details on configuration choices are given in the M51 simulation guide [1].
repodir=os.getenv("CASAPATH").split(' ')[0]
antennalist = repodir+"/data/alma/simmos/alma.out08.cfg"
totaltime = '600s'
thermalnoise = ""
image = T
vis = '$project.ms'
imsize = [300,300]
cell = '0.043arcsec'
niter = 2000
weighting = 'natural'
analyze=F
overwrite=T
simdata
The output image should have a synthesized beam of 0.62"x0.56" and look something like:
Now we repeat for an 1hr observation:
tget simdata
project = 'fs_cfg8_1hr' # Full science, configuration 08, 1 hour
totaltime = '3600s'
simdata
Which should look something like:
Finally, two Early Science simulations, using the extended configuration. One 10min simulation:
tget simdata
project = 'es_extended_10m'
antennalist = repodir+"/data/alma/simmos/alma.cycle0.extended.cfg"
totaltime = '600s'
simdata
and a 4hr simulation:
tget simdata
project = 'es_extended_4hr'
totaltime = '14400s'
simdata
Further experiments:
Some more things to try:
An 8hr observation shows the improvement obtained by obtaining fuller uv-coverage in the full science array:
tget simdata
antennalist = repodir+"/data/alma/simmos/alma.out08.cfg"
project = 'fs_cfg8_8hr'
totaltime = '28800s'
simdata
Which should look something like:
An attempt to make a higher resolution image shows what happens when short spacings are missing in the configuration. Configuration 16 has a 0.17x0.15 beam, still better than Nyquist sampling of the model image (which has 0.043" pixels). However, the lack of short spacings in the configuration leads to poorly sampled structure on large spatial scales. In practice, one would need to combine these observations with a set in a more compact configuration (such as 8) to sample both the large and small spatial structures.
tget simdata
antennalist = repodir+"/data/alma/simmos/alma.out16.cfg"
project = 'fs_cfg16_1hr'
totaltime = '3600s'
simdata