ALMA Pipeline Known Issues: Difference between revisions

From CASA Guides
Jump to navigationJump to search
Thunter (talk | contribs)
Thunter (talk | contribs)
Line 6: Line 6:
1. A bug in imaging ephemeris cubes ([https://open-jira.nrao.edu/browse/CAS-13908 CAS-13908]) will sometimes cause part of the cube being erroneously empty, clearly visible in the pipeline spectrum under "other QA images": [[File:Europa_sci.spw27.cube.I.iter1.image.spectrum.png|100px]]
1. A bug in imaging ephemeris cubes ([https://open-jira.nrao.edu/browse/CAS-13908 CAS-13908]) will sometimes cause part of the cube being erroneously empty, clearly visible in the pipeline spectrum under "other QA images": [[File:Europa_sci.spw27.cube.I.iter1.image.spectrum.png|100px]]


2. The tclean parameter psfphasecenter is currently not functioning (CAS-13899). If you want to image a mosaic with no data at phase center, then you should make the image larger and move the phase center to a pointing that has data.
2. The tclean parameter psfphasecenter is currently not functioning ([https://open-jira.nrao.edu/browse/CAS-13899 CAS-13899]). If you want to image a mosaic with no data at phase center, then you should make the image larger and move the phase center to a pointing that has data.


=== Interferometric Pipeline ===
=== Interferometric Pipeline ===
1. If the check source is so faint that no gain solutions can be found, then hifa_gfluxscale will crash (PIPE-1468).
1. If the check source is so faint that no gain solutions can be found, then hifa_gfluxscale will crash ([https://open-jira.nrao.edu/browse/PIPE-1468 PIPE-1468]).


2. An irregular mosaic with no pointing at the geometric center will likely fail, and the pipeline will warn you of this likelihood. Until the CASA bug with psfphasecenter is resolved (CAS-13899), create a larger image and put the phasecenter a pointing with data.  (PIPE-98)
2. An irregular mosaic with no pointing at the geometric center will likely fail, and the pipeline will warn you of this likelihood. Until the CASA bug with psfphasecenter is resolved ([https://open-jira.nrao.edu/browse/CAS-13899 CAS-13899]), create a larger image and put the phasecenter a pointing with data.  ([https://open-jira.nrao.edu/browse/PIPE-98 PIPE-98])


3. The atmospheric transmission curves overlaid in h_tsyscal, hifa_tsysflag, and hifa_bandpass will be incorrect if any weather stations have non-sensical pressure data. (CAS-13910)
3. The atmospheric transmission curves overlaid in h_tsyscal, hifa_tsysflag, and hifa_bandpass will be incorrect if any weather stations have non-sensical pressure data. ([https://open-jira.nrao.edu/browse/CAS-13910 CAS-13910])


4. This version of the pipeline won’t run on Cycle 2 and earlier data that were labeled J2000 frame because astropy does not recognize J2000. The workaround is to set hifa_flagdata(lowtrans=False) in the PPR (PIPE-1575).
4. This version of the pipeline won’t run on Cycle 2 and earlier data that were labeled J2000 frame because astropy does not recognize J2000. The workaround is to set hifa_flagdata(lowtrans=False) in the PPR ([https://open-jira.nrao.edu/browse/PIPE-1575 PIPE_1575]).


5. For Single-pol data: (there are none in C8, 2 approved C-rank in C9, so very rare)
5. For Single-pol data: (there are none in C8, 2 approved C-rank in C9, so very rare)
* The new calculation of achieved SNR in hifa_spwphaseup will issue a spurious red QA warning that the achieved SNR is zero - the actual calibration and data are fine, this is only a bug in the QA score calculation (PIPE-1623)
* The new calculation of achieved SNR in hifa_spwphaseup will issue a spurious red QA warning that the achieved SNR is zero - the actual calibration and data are fine, this is only a bug in the QA score calculation ([https://open-jira.nrao.edu/browse/PIPE-1623 PIPE-1623])
* The new phase offsets QA score in hifa_timegaincal fails (PIPE-1628).
* The new phase offsets QA score in hifa_timegaincal fails ([https://open-jira.nrao.edu/browse/PIPE-1628 PIPE-1628]).
* hifa_tsyscal or hifa_tsysflag *might* fail due to the recent change to single-pol Tsys (ICT-15219), not communicated to the PL team and for which no E2E9 data were acquired.
* hifa_tsyscal or hifa_tsysflag *might* fail due to the recent change to single-pol Tsys (ICT-15219), not communicated to the PL team and for which no E2E9 data were acquired.


6. Band 5 data with science spws overlapping with the WVR spws might fail in hif_uvcontfit because of a CASA bug (CAS-13843) in calculating TOPO ranges for such spws (PIPE-1530). The workaround is to set a suitable continuum selection range for (only) the failing spw(s) in cont.dat prior to re-running the pipeline.
6. Band 5 data with science spws overlapping with the WVR spws might fail in hif_uvcontfit because of a CASA bug ([https://open-jira.nrao.edu/browse/CAS-13843 CAS-13843]) in calculating TOPO ranges for such spws ([https://open-jira.nrao.edu/browse/PIPE-1530 PIPE-1530]). The workaround is to set a suitable continuum selection range for (only) the failing spw(s) in cont.dat prior to re-running the pipeline.


7. In hifa_antpos, in the second table "Antenna Position Offsets Sorted By Total Offset", when there are two antennas with the same offset and the Total Offset column has a common value, the second antenna is not bolded in the same way as the first.  (PIPE-1631).
7. In hifa_antpos, in the second table "Antenna Position Offsets Sorted By Total Offset", when there are two antennas with the same offset and the Total Offset column has a common value, the second antenna is not bolded in the same way as the first.  ([https://open-jira.nrao.edu/browse/PIPE-1631 PIPE-1631]).


8. In hifa_gfluxscaleflag, the flagging summary table does not reflect flagging applied to the TARGET intent when flags for bad baselines are propagated from PHASE cal (PIPE-1630).
8. In hifa_gfluxscaleflag, the flagging summary table does not reflect flagging applied to the TARGET intent when flags for bad baselines are propagated from PHASE cal ([https://open-jira.nrao.edu/browse/PIPE-1630 PIPE-1630]).


9. In hifa_spwphaseup, (i) if several antennas of a CM+PM heterogeneous dataset are flagged on the bandpass calibrator, then the value of the Median Phase RMS in the table will be NaN and the QA score will be 0.0. (ii) if the refant drops out for the majority of solutions the Median Phase RMS assessment cannot be made; (iii) if there is low SNR in the bandpass solutions and the refant jumps in phase then some antennas can incorrectly be identified as outliers by the Median Phase RMS assessment.
9. In hifa_spwphaseup, (i) if several antennas of a CM+PM heterogeneous dataset are flagged on the bandpass calibrator, then the value of the Median Phase RMS in the table will be NaN and the QA score will be 0.0. (ii) if the refant drops out for the majority of solutions the Median Phase RMS assessment cannot be made; (iii) if there is low SNR in the bandpass solutions and the refant jumps in phase then some antennas can incorrectly be identified as outliers by the Median Phase RMS assessment.
Line 32: Line 32:
10. For hifa_makeimages(cubes), if mom8fc score is yellow, it rarely means that continuum subtraction needs to be redone (see DRM training material)
10. For hifa_makeimages(cubes), if mom8fc score is yellow, it rarely means that continuum subtraction needs to be redone (see DRM training material)


11. Due to CASA bug CAS-13908, PLWG recommends that all multi-EB ephemeris data be run in serial.
11. Due to CASA bug [https://open-jira.nrao.edu/browse/CAS-13908 CAS-13908], PLWG recommends that all multi-EB ephemeris data be run in serial mode.


12. The phase structure function plots in hifa_wvrgcalflag are calculated from antenna-based gains, so baseline-based flags will not be reflected in the plot.
12. The phase structure function plots in hifa_wvrgcalflag are calculated from antenna-based gains, so baseline-based flags will not be reflected in the plot.

Revision as of 14:52, 10 November 2022

Known Issues for PL2022.2.0

Release date Oct 2022

CASA

1. A bug in imaging ephemeris cubes (CAS-13908) will sometimes cause part of the cube being erroneously empty, clearly visible in the pipeline spectrum under "other QA images":

2. The tclean parameter psfphasecenter is currently not functioning (CAS-13899). If you want to image a mosaic with no data at phase center, then you should make the image larger and move the phase center to a pointing that has data.

Interferometric Pipeline

1. If the check source is so faint that no gain solutions can be found, then hifa_gfluxscale will crash (PIPE-1468).

2. An irregular mosaic with no pointing at the geometric center will likely fail, and the pipeline will warn you of this likelihood. Until the CASA bug with psfphasecenter is resolved (CAS-13899), create a larger image and put the phasecenter a pointing with data. (PIPE-98)

3. The atmospheric transmission curves overlaid in h_tsyscal, hifa_tsysflag, and hifa_bandpass will be incorrect if any weather stations have non-sensical pressure data. (CAS-13910)

4. This version of the pipeline won’t run on Cycle 2 and earlier data that were labeled J2000 frame because astropy does not recognize J2000. The workaround is to set hifa_flagdata(lowtrans=False) in the PPR (PIPE_1575).

5. For Single-pol data: (there are none in C8, 2 approved C-rank in C9, so very rare)

  • The new calculation of achieved SNR in hifa_spwphaseup will issue a spurious red QA warning that the achieved SNR is zero - the actual calibration and data are fine, this is only a bug in the QA score calculation (PIPE-1623)
  • The new phase offsets QA score in hifa_timegaincal fails (PIPE-1628).
  • hifa_tsyscal or hifa_tsysflag *might* fail due to the recent change to single-pol Tsys (ICT-15219), not communicated to the PL team and for which no E2E9 data were acquired.

6. Band 5 data with science spws overlapping with the WVR spws might fail in hif_uvcontfit because of a CASA bug (CAS-13843) in calculating TOPO ranges for such spws (PIPE-1530). The workaround is to set a suitable continuum selection range for (only) the failing spw(s) in cont.dat prior to re-running the pipeline.

7. In hifa_antpos, in the second table "Antenna Position Offsets Sorted By Total Offset", when there are two antennas with the same offset and the Total Offset column has a common value, the second antenna is not bolded in the same way as the first. (PIPE-1631).

8. In hifa_gfluxscaleflag, the flagging summary table does not reflect flagging applied to the TARGET intent when flags for bad baselines are propagated from PHASE cal (PIPE-1630).

9. In hifa_spwphaseup, (i) if several antennas of a CM+PM heterogeneous dataset are flagged on the bandpass calibrator, then the value of the Median Phase RMS in the table will be NaN and the QA score will be 0.0. (ii) if the refant drops out for the majority of solutions the Median Phase RMS assessment cannot be made; (iii) if there is low SNR in the bandpass solutions and the refant jumps in phase then some antennas can incorrectly be identified as outliers by the Median Phase RMS assessment.

10. For hifa_makeimages(cubes), if mom8fc score is yellow, it rarely means that continuum subtraction needs to be redone (see DRM training material)

11. Due to CASA bug CAS-13908, PLWG recommends that all multi-EB ephemeris data be run in serial mode.

12. The phase structure function plots in hifa_wvrgcalflag are calculated from antenna-based gains, so baseline-based flags will not be reflected in the plot.

13. In the polcal recipe, if the session reference antenna is fully flagged on any spw by hifa_gfluxscaleflag, then hifa_gfluxscale will crash. The workaround is to set a different reference antenna (or list of reference antennas) in the hif_refant task in the PPR.

Single Dish Pipeline


Browser security and viewing file://weblog

More stringent security in most web browsers in 2020 broke the weblog when displayed using a file:// URL, and users may encounter "failure to load" errors ([Firefox security update details|https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/CORS/Errors/CORSRequestNotHttp]). As of PL2020, the weblog contains instructions for what users can do if they encounter this error, including a new local html server embedded in the pipeline that users can access through CASA. These are applicable for the older weblogs, even if the weblog itself won't give them to you. (Note that newer versions of firefox (>=v96, ~Feb 2022) no longer have the parameter "privacy.file_unique_origin", but in that case the same workaround described below can be achieved by setting "security.fileuri.strict_origin_policy" to False).

In addition to the suggestions below, you can start a local http server with python3, either the one included with casa, or the one installed on your system:

python3 -m http.server 8080 --bind 127.0.0.1 & and then access in your browser the url http://127.0.0.1:8080/




Known Issues for PL2021.2.0

Release date Oct 2021

CASA

1. The bsend mechanism has a limit of 100 MB (introduced in 2014), which can cause the pipeline to fail (PIPE-1337) on MOUS with large numbers of EBs/spws/targets/integrations. So far, it has been seen only on a 42-EB 7m dataset. fixed 2022

Interferometric Pipeline

1. CASA tclean sometimes exits with an unsupported code “0” - this generally is okay, but PL will capture that as a yellow warning in the weblog, and the data reducer should check the images for scientific acceptability. fixed 2022

2. In the hifa_almarenorm PDF summary plot, if the first spw is narrow, subsequent spws even if wide will be missing the vertical segment boundary lines. This only affects the summary plot, so other plots in the PDF will show the lines. fixed 2022

3. When spw mapping is in use, bad data can sometimes escape unassessed by hifa_bandpassflag and appear as bad in hifa_timegaincal and hif_applycal (PIPE-838, to be fixed by PIPE-1154 where spw mapping and combination will be prohibited for all calibrators except the phase calibrator). fixed 2022

4. If an spw is fully flagged for Tsys in hifa_tsysflag, then hifa_gfluxscale can crash (PIPE-1208). This is often due to poor or strongly-varying atmospheric transmission vs. frequency. The possible workarounds are to either: set the offending EB to SemiPass, raise ff_max_limit from 13 to 30 for hifa_tsysflag in the PPR, or flag the poorest transmission parts of the spw (both its Tsys solutions and visibility data). fixed 2022

5. For the hif_applycal stage, the QA subscore for %newly flagged is not included in the overall score evaluation, meaning that a “!” or “?” can appear in the left navigation pane, different from the “By Topic” QA color bar for hif_applycal. fixed 2022

6. As in previous releases, in the hif_applycal weblog, if there are multiple phase calibrators or check sources, their calibrated spectra are overlaid in the same plot (PIPE-432). fixed 2022

7. A bad score for the mom8fc can be erroneously triggered in cube hifa_makeimages when the channelized noise is not uniform in the findcont channels, and has some channels with significantly higher noise (e.g. in regions of deep atmospheric absorption), resulting in more pixels above the Peak/(medianChanMAD) than expected. No workaround - looking at weblog plots should make it clear that there is really no emission in the findcont channels. improved 2022, may still require manual examination

8. full-polarization datasets contain a hifa_lock_refant() task - 'pipelinemode="automatic"' must be removed from that task in casa_pipescript.py in order for casa_pipescript.py to run (PIPE-1226). casa_restorescript.py works without modification. fixed 2022

9. MOUS with large numbers of EBs/spws/fields/integrations can exceed the 100MB memory footprint of bsend in CASA and crash (PIPE-1337). This feature was introduced in 2014 and a small increase has been requested (CAS-13656). improved 2022

10. As in previous releases, in the hif_applycal weblog, if there are multiple phase calibrators or check sources, their calibrated spectra are overlaid in the same plot (PIPE-432). fixed 2022

11. If pointing is not performed in every EB of a full-polarization dataset, hif_makeimages (check sources) can crash (PIPE-1364). fixed 2022

12. If the check source is so faint that no gain solutions can be found, then hifa_gfluxscale will crash (PIPE-1468).

13. An irregular mosaic with no pointing at the geometric center will likely fail, and the pipeline will warn you of this likelihood. You can use tclean with the psfphasecenter parameter to image manually. (PIPE-98)

Single Dish Pipeline

0. Some task parameters in PPR are not selected properly. For example, hsd_blflag fails when spw is specified in PPR (PIPE-1298).

1. hsd_imaging does not properly combine datasets associated with virtual spw. (PIPE-1478)



Known Issues for PL2020.1.0

Release date Feb 2021

CASA

CASA 6.1.X known issues

Interferometric Pipeline

0. For polarization datasets, hifa_restoredata does not include the polarization calibrator in its applycal commands. A workaround is being arranged with DRM.

1. If hifa_lowgainflag flags a large number of antennas on a given spw, but not all antennas, then the imaging pipeline can crash downstream in hif_findcont. One workaround is to set niter=2 in hifa_lowgainflag in the PPR. This works as desired (the whole spw is flagged), but it fails to render the weblog page for hifa_lowgainflag. The other alternative is to apply a manual flag for the spw in the regular flag template file.

2. A bad score for the mom8fc can be erroneously triggered in cube hifa_makeimages when the channelized noise is not uniform in the findcont channels, and has some channels with significantly higher noise (e.g. in regions of deep atmospheric absorption), resulting in more pixels above the Peak/(medianChanMAD) than expected. No workaround - looking at weblog plots should make it clear that there is really no emission in the findcont channels.

3. For full-polarization datasets, the amp vs. time detail plots (per antenna) in hif_applycal do not include the calibrator scans with POLARIZATION intent, but the plots of calibration slutions in hifa_timegaincal do include them. The workaround is to run plotms manually if there is bad data in the parent plot (with all antennas overlaid) and you want to determine the subset of antennas involved.

4. The amplitude vs uv distance version of the “before/after flagging” plots are not shown in hifa_polcalflag. Only the ampl. vs time plots are shown.

5. Datasets suffering from the Cycle 7 correlator instrumental problem related to concurrent subarrays can have some outliers escape unflagged. But this issue was apparently fixed in SCCB-1042 (2021-05-20), so it should not affect the remainder of Cycle 7 data.

6. Antenna-based single-polarization, single-integration outliers not apparent in hifa_polcalflag can appear as amplitude outliers on the polarization calibrator in hif_applycal.

7. When spw mapping is used in hifa_spwphaseup, bad data on the bandpass calibrator can escape hifa_bandpassflag unflagged and appear as outliers in hif_applycal, because the timegaincal solutions come from a different spw when applycal is run.

8. The QA message in hifa_gfluxscale on the ratio of S_calibrated / S_catalog has an incorrectly calculated percentage.

9. For Cycle 3 datasets affected by extra field IDs associated with only SQLD data, the new hifa_targetflag stage will show a warning message for these fields (each spw): "Warning! Unable to compute flagging for intent TARGET, field 2, spw 16". The workaround is simply to ignore this warning – it should not happen in new data.

10. Due to CASA changing how tasks are built, several tasks fail to completely render the "inp" input parameters (blank lines appear in the "inp" output). help(taskname) still lists all of the available parameters, and we strongly recommend users refer to the Reference Manual if task parameters are not clear. Affected tasks: hifa_importdata, hifa_wvrgcalflag, hif_lowgainflag, hifa_bandpassflag, hifa_bandpass, hif_applycal, hif_makeimlist, hif_makeimages, hifa_imageprecheck, hif_checkproductsize, hifa_exportdata, hif_mstransform, hif_findcont, hsd_importdata, hsd_flagdata, hsd_applycal, hsd_imaging, hifa_polcalflag, hif_uvcontfit, hif_uvcontsub (dryrun parameter only missing)

11. In the Cycle 6, Cycle 7, and PL2020 releases: datasets with heterogenous antenna diameters will also include the cross-diameter baselines in the science target imaging (rather than merely the 7m-7m or merely the 12m-12m baselines). The calibrator imaging stage correctly includes all baselines, as desired. For 7m array projects with 1 or more 12m antennas included, the effects on the resulting image are: a different effective PB response (slightly smaller), lower noise, a smaller synthesized beam, and (likely) a smaller LAS. Different science use cases may see the net difference as a positive or negative effect.

12. In all pipeline releases through PL2020: FDM spws with 256 channels are being labeled as TDM on the Spectral Setup details page. This is due to faulty logic implemented in CASA::msmd.almaspws.

13. Full-polarization datasets contain a hifa_lock_refant() task - 'pipelinemode="automatic"' must be remove from that task in casa_pipescript.py in order for casa_pipescript.py to run. casa_restorescript.py works without modification.

14. As in previous releases, in the hif_applycal weblog, if there are multiple phase calibrators or check sources, their calibrated spectra are overlaid in the same plot (PIPE-432).

15. If pointing is not performed in every EB of a full-polarization dataset, hif_makeimages (check sources) can crash (PIPE-1364).

16. If the check source is so faint that no gain solutions can be found, then hifa_gfluxscale will crash (PIPE-1468).

Single Dish Pipeline

1. Observed RMS tends to be larger than theoretical RMS (SD pipeline). There are two possible causes. One is that ATM and ripple features remain in the final image. The second is that the pixels located at the map edge are included in the measurement of the observed RMS. The latter will be improved in pipeline2021.

2. Strong emission is flagged in hsd_blflag. The reason of this issue is that some emission components at some channels (i.e. wing component) are not identified as a line. This increases the RMS at corresponding channels. Essentially, improving the line identification algorithm is required to fix this issue. This issue can be avoided by changing the threshold of blflag manually.

3. Wrong position of the open circle indicating peak SN position in Peak SN map. When the scan direction is not along RA/DEC, the open circle indicating peak SN position in Peak SN map and spectrum at peak position are not plotted correctly. However, the information of the peak position is used just as a reference. This does not affect the detection of the contamination and giving “warning”.

4. hsdn_restoredata crashes (Nobeyama Pipeline)

5. executeppr does not support hsd_restoredata task (ALMA-SD Pipeline)