Averaging data in plotms: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<div style="float: left; width: 50%; align: left;"> | <div style="float: left; width: 50%; align: left;"> | ||
However, time averaging can be a little confusing, as it is controlled by three fields. If you click the checkbox next to '''Time''' under '''Averaging''', a blank box with units of 'seconds' should become active, along with two checkboxes: '''Scan''' and '''Field'''. To the right, we've plotted two calibrator sources from a multi-source measurement set. There has been no averaging. One is a phase calibrator observed in six scans, while the other is a brighter flux calibrator observed in one scan at the end of the observations. | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div style="float: right; width: 50%; text-align: center;"> | <div style="float: right; width: 50%; text-align: center;"> | ||
[[File: | [[File:plotms_timeave0.jpg | 400px]] | ||
''Click to enlarge'' | ''Click to enlarge'' |
Revision as of 01:22, 19 February 2010
You can average your measurement set on the fly with plotms. The averaging options can be found under the Data tab, and are mostly intuitive.
However, time averaging can be a little confusing, as it is controlled by three fields. If you click the checkbox next to Time under Averaging, a blank box with units of 'seconds' should become active, along with two checkboxes: Scan and Field. To the right, we've plotted two calibrator sources from a multi-source measurement set. There has been no averaging. One is a phase calibrator observed in six scans, while the other is a brighter flux calibrator observed in one scan at the end of the observations. |
However, time averaging can be a little confusing, as it is controlled by three fields. If you click the checkbox next to Time under Averaging, a blank box with units of 'seconds' should become active, along with two checkboxes: Scan and Field. To the right, we've plotted two calibrator sources from a multi-source measurement set. There has been no averaging. One is a phase calibrator observed in six scans, while the other is a brighter flux calibrator observed in one scan at the end of the observations.
|