|
|
| (85 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| [[Category:EVLA]][[Category:Calibration]]
| | #REDIRECT [[EVLA Continuum Tutorial 3C391-CASA4.6]] |
| | |
| == BEFORE YOU START==
| |
| Make sure you have done the steps described at [[Initial_instructions_for_2010| the initial instructions for the 2010 Synthesis Workshop Tutorials]].
| |
| | |
| == Overview ==
| |
| This article describes the calibration and imaging of a multiple-pointing EVLA continuum dataset on the supernova remnant
| |
| [http://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/sim-id?Ident=3C+391&NbIdent=1&Radius=2&Radius.unit=arcmin&submit=submit+id 3C 391]. The data were taken in OSRO1 mode, with 128 MHz of bandwidth in each of two widely spaced spectral windows, centered at 4.6 and 7.5 GHz, and were set up for full polarization calibration.
| |
| | |
| There are a number of possible ways to run CASA, described in more detail in [[Getting_Started_in_CASA]]. In brief, there are at least three different ways to run CASA:
| |
| * Interactively examining task inputs. In this mode, one types <tt>default taskname</tt> to load the task, <tt>inp</tt> to examine the inputs, and <tt>go</tt> once those inputs have been set to your satisfaction. Allowed inputs are shown in blue, and bad inputs are colored red. The inputs themselves are changed one by one, e.g., <tt>selectdata=T</tt>. Screenshots of the inputs to various tasks used in the data reduction below are provided, to illustrate which parameters need to be set.
| |
| More detailed help can be obtained on any task by typing <tt>help taskname</tt>. Once a task is run, the set of inputs are stored and can be retrieved via <tt>tget taskname</tt>; subsequent runs will overwrite the previous <tt>tget</tt> file.
| |
| * Pseudo-interactively via task function calls. In this case, all of the desired inputs to a task are provided at once on the CASA command line. This tutorial is made up of such calls, which were developed by looking at the inputs for each task and deciding what needed to be changed from default values. For task function calls, only parameters that you want to be different from their defaults need to be set.
| |
| * Non-interactively via a script. A series of task function calls can be combined together into a script, and run from within CASA via <tt>execfile('scriptname.py')</tt>. This (and other) CASAguide has been designed to be extracted into a script using the [[Extracting_scripts_from_these_tutorials | script extractor]]. Should one use the script generated by the [[Extracting_scripts_from_these_tutorials | script extractor]] for this CASAguide, be aware that it will require some small amount of interaction related to the plotting, occasionally suggesting that you close the graphics window and hitting return in the terminal to proceed. It is in fact unnecessary to close the graphics windows (it is suggested that you do so purely to keep your desktop uncluttered), and in one case (that of {{plotms}}), you '''must''' leave the graphics window open, as the GUI cannot be reopened without first exiting from CASA.
| |
| | |
| If you are a relative novice (and <em>particularly</em> for this tutorial), it is <em>strongly</em> recommended that you start with the interactive mode, graduating to the pseudo- or non-interactive mode as you gain experience. Work at your own pace, look at the inputs to the tasks to see what other options exist, and read the help files.
| |
| | |
| == Obtaining the Data ==
| |
| | |
| For the purposes of this tutorial, we have created a "starting" data set, upon which several initial processing steps have already been conducted. This data set may already be present on the machine that you are using; if not, obtain it from the
| |
| [http://casa.nrao.edu/Data/EVLA/3C391/3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.ms.tgz CASA data archive].
| |
| | |
| We are providing this "starting" data set, rather than the "true" initial data set for (at least) two reasons. First, many of these initial processing steps can be rather time consuming (> 1 hr), and the time for the data reduction tutorial is limited. Second, while necessary, many of these steps are not fundamental to the calibration and imaging process, upon which we want to focus today. For completeness, however, here are the steps that were taken from the initial data set to produce the "starting" data set:
| |
| * The data loaded into CASA, converting the initial Science Data Model (SDM) file into a measurement set.
| |
| * Basic data flagging was applied, to account for "shadowing" of the antennas. These data are from the D configuration, in which antennas are particularly susceptible to being blocked or "shadowed" by other antennas in the array, depending upon the elevation of the source.
| |
| * The data were averaged to 10-second samples, from the initial 1-second correlator sample time. In the D configuration, the fringe rate is relatively slow and time-average smearing is less of a concern.
| |
| * The data were acquired with two spectral windows (around 4.6 and 7.5 GHz). Because of disk space concerns on some machines, the focus will be on only one of the two spectral windows.
| |
| | |
| We emphasize that, were this a real science observation, all of these steps would need to be run. Detailed instructions on obtaining the data from the archive and creating this "starting" data set may be found in the [[Obtaining EVLA Data: 3C 391 Example]] tutorial.
| |
| | |
| == The Observation ==
| |
| | |
| Before starting the calibration process, we want to get some basic information about the data set. To examine the observing conditions during the observing run, and to find out any known problems with the data, download the [http://www.vla.nrao.edu/cgi-bin/oplogs.cgi observer log]. Simply fill in the known observing date (in our case 2010-Apr-24) as both the Start and Stop date, and click on the "Show Logs" button. The relevant log is labeled with the project code, TDEM0001, and can be downloaded as a PDF file. From this, we find the following:
| |
| | |
| <pre style="background-color: #E0FFFF;">
| |
| Information from observing log:
| |
| There is no C-band receivers on ea13
| |
| Antenna ea06 is out of the array
| |
| Antenna ea15 has some corrupted data
| |
| Antennas ea10, ea12, ea22 do not have good baseline positions
| |
| Gusty winds, mixed clouds, API rms up to 11.5.
| |
| </pre>
| |
| | |
| Before beginning our data reduction, we must start CASA. If you have not used CASA before, some helpful tips are available on the [[Getting Started in CASA]] page.
| |
| | |
| Once you have CASA up and running in the directory containing the data, then start your data reduction by getting some basic information about the data. The task {{listobs}} can be used to get a listing of the individual scans comprising the observation, the frequency setup, source list, and antenna locations.
| |
| | |
| <source lang="python">
| |
| # In CASA
| |
| listobs(vis='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.ms',verbose=T)
| |
| </source>
| |
| | |
| {{listobs}} should now produce output similar to the following in the casa logger. (Note that the listing shown is for both spectral windows, whereas the data set actually being used contains only one spectral window.)
| |
| | |
| One will note that there are nine sources observed. Here the various sources are introduced briefly, with more detail contained in the sections below in which they are used.
| |
| * J1331+3030 = 3C 286, which will later serve as a calibrator for the visibility amplitudes, i.e., it is assumed to have a precisely known flux density; the spectral bandpass; and the polarization position angle;
| |
| * J1822-0938, which will serve as a calibrator for the visibility phases;
| |
| * J0319+4130 = 3C 84, which will serve as a polarization calibrator; and
| |
| * 3C391 C1--C7, which are 7 fields centered on and surrounding the supernova remnant.
| |
| This observation was set up as a 7-pointing mosaic because the supernova remnant is so large that it essentially fills the primary beam.
| |
| | |
| | |
| <pre style="background-color: #ffe4b5;">
| |
| INFO listobs::::casa ##########################################
| |
| INFO listobs::::casa ##### Begin Task: listobs #####
| |
| INFO listobs::::casa
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary ================================================================================
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ MeasurementSet Name: /export/home/hamal/jmiller/TDEM0001_sb1218006/3c391_mosaic_fullres.ms MS Version 2
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ ================================================================================
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ Observer: Dr. James Miller-Jones Project: T.B.D.
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ Observation: EVLA
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary Data records: 18666050 Total integration time = 28716 seconds
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ Observed from 24-Apr-2010/08:01:34.5 to 24-Apr-2010/16:00:10.5 (UTC)
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ ObservationID = 0 ArrayID = 0
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ Date Timerange (UTC) Scan FldId FieldName nVis Int(s) SpwIds
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 24-Apr-2010/08:01:34.5 - 08:02:28.5 1 0 J1331+3030 35750 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 08:02:29.5 - 08:09:27.5 2 0 J1331+3030 272350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 08:09:28.5 - 08:16:26.5 3 0 J1331+3030 272350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 08:16:27.5 - 08:24:25.5 4 1 J1822-0938 311350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 08:24:26.5 - 08:29:44.5 5 2 3C391 C1 207350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 08:29:45.5 - 08:34:43.5 6 3 3C391 C2 194350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 08:34:44.5 - 08:39:42.5 7 4 3C391 C3 194350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 08:39:43.5 - 08:44:41.5 8 5 3C391 C4 194350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 08:44:42.5 - 08:49:40.5 9 6 3C391 C5 194350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 08:49:41.5 - 08:54:40.5 10 7 3C391 C6 195000 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 08:54:41.5 - 08:59:39.5 11 8 3C391 C7 194350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 08:59:40.5 - 09:01:29.5 12 1 J1822-0938 71500 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 09:01:30.5 - 09:06:48.5 13 2 3C391 C1 207350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 09:06:49.5 - 09:11:47.5 14 3 3C391 C2 194350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 09:11:48.5 - 09:16:46.5 15 4 3C391 C3 194350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 09:16:47.5 - 09:21:45.5 16 5 3C391 C4 194350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 09:21:46.5 - 09:26:44.5 17 6 3C391 C5 194350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 09:26:45.5 - 09:31:44.5 18 7 3C391 C6 195000 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 09:31:45.5 - 09:36:43.5 19 8 3C391 C7 194350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 09:36:44.5 - 09:38:32.5 20 1 J1822-0938 70850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 09:38:33.5 - 09:43:52.5 21 2 3C391 C1 208000 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 09:43:53.5 - 09:48:51.5 22 3 3C391 C2 194350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 09:48:52.5 - 09:53:50.5 23 4 3C391 C3 194350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 09:53:51.5 - 09:58:49.5 24 5 3C391 C4 194350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 09:58:50.5 - 10:03:48.5 25 6 3C391 C5 194350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 10:03:49.5 - 10:08:47.5 26 7 3C391 C6 194350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 10:08:48.5 - 10:13:47.5 27 8 3C391 C7 195000 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 10:13:48.5 - 10:15:36.5 28 1 J1822-0938 70850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 10:15:37.5 - 10:20:55.5 29 2 3C391 C1 207350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 10:20:56.5 - 10:25:55.5 30 3 3C391 C2 195000 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 10:25:56.5 - 10:30:54.5 31 4 3C391 C3 194350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 10:30:55.5 - 10:35:53.5 32 5 3C391 C4 194350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 10:35:54.5 - 10:40:52.5 33 6 3C391 C5 194350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 10:40:53.5 - 10:45:51.5 34 7 3C391 C6 194350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 10:45:52.5 - 10:50:51.5 35 8 3C391 C7 195000 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 10:50:52.5 - 10:52:40.5 36 1 J1822-0938 70850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 10:52:41.5 - 10:57:39.5 37 0 J1331+3030 194350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 10:57:40.5 - 11:02:39.5 38 1 J1822-0938 195000 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 11:02:40.5 - 11:07:58.5 39 2 3C391 C1 207350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 11:07:59.5 - 11:12:47.5 40 3 3C391 C2 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 11:12:48.5 - 11:17:36.5 41 4 3C391 C3 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 11:17:37.5 - 11:22:25.5 42 5 3C391 C4 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 11:22:26.5 - 11:27:15.5 43 6 3C391 C5 188500 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 11:27:16.5 - 11:32:04.5 44 7 3C391 C6 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 11:32:05.5 - 11:36:53.5 45 8 3C391 C7 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 11:36:54.5 - 11:38:43.5 46 1 J1822-0938 71500 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 11:38:44.5 - 11:44:02.5 47 2 3C391 C1 207350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 11:44:03.5 - 11:48:51.5 48 3 3C391 C2 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 11:48:52.5 - 11:53:40.5 49 4 3C391 C3 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 11:53:41.5 - 11:58:29.5 50 5 3C391 C4 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 11:58:30.5 - 12:03:19.5 51 6 3C391 C5 188500 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 12:03:20.5 - 12:08:08.5 52 7 3C391 C6 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 12:08:09.5 - 12:12:57.5 53 8 3C391 C7 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 12:12:58.5 - 12:14:47.5 54 1 J1822-0938 71500 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 12:14:48.5 - 12:20:06.5 55 2 3C391 C1 207350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 12:20:07.5 - 12:24:55.5 56 3 3C391 C2 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 12:24:56.5 - 12:29:44.5 57 4 3C391 C3 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 12:29:45.5 - 12:34:34.5 58 5 3C391 C4 188500 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 12:34:35.5 - 12:39:23.5 59 6 3C391 C5 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 12:39:24.5 - 12:44:12.5 60 7 3C391 C6 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 12:44:13.5 - 12:49:01.5 61 8 3C391 C7 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 12:49:02.5 - 12:50:51.5 62 1 J1822-0938 71500 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 12:50:52.5 - 12:56:10.5 63 2 3C391 C1 207350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 12:56:11.5 - 13:00:59.5 64 3 3C391 C2 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 13:01:00.5 - 13:05:48.5 65 4 3C391 C3 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 13:05:49.5 - 13:10:38.5 66 5 3C391 C4 188500 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 13:10:39.5 - 13:15:27.5 67 6 3C391 C5 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 13:15:28.5 - 13:20:16.5 68 7 3C391 C6 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 13:20:17.5 - 13:25:05.5 69 8 3C391 C7 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 13:25:06.5 - 13:26:55.5 70 1 J1822-0938 71500 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 13:26:56.5 - 13:32:14.5 71 2 3C391 C1 207350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 13:32:15.5 - 13:37:03.5 72 3 3C391 C2 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 13:37:04.5 - 13:41:52.5 73 4 3C391 C3 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 13:41:53.5 - 13:46:42.5 74 5 3C391 C4 188500 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 13:46:43.5 - 13:51:31.5 75 6 3C391 C5 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 13:51:32.5 - 13:56:20.5 76 7 3C391 C6 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 13:56:21.5 - 14:01:09.5 77 8 3C391 C7 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 14:01:10.5 - 14:02:59.5 78 1 J1822-0938 71500 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 14:03:00.5 - 14:08:18.5 79 2 3C391 C1 207350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 14:08:19.5 - 14:13:07.5 80 3 3C391 C2 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 14:13:08.5 - 14:17:57.5 81 4 3C391 C3 188500 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 14:17:58.5 - 14:22:46.5 82 5 3C391 C4 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 14:22:47.5 - 14:27:35.5 83 6 3C391 C5 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 14:27:36.5 - 14:32:24.5 84 7 3C391 C6 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 14:32:25.5 - 14:37:13.5 85 8 3C391 C7 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 14:37:14.5 - 14:39:03.5 86 1 J1822-0938 71500 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 14:39:04.5 - 14:44:22.5 87 2 3C391 C1 207350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 14:44:23.5 - 14:49:11.5 88 3 3C391 C2 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 14:49:12.5 - 14:54:01.5 89 4 3C391 C3 188500 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 14:54:02.5 - 14:58:50.5 90 5 3C391 C4 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 14:58:51.5 - 15:03:39.5 91 6 3C391 C5 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 15:03:40.5 - 15:08:28.5 92 7 3C391 C6 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 15:08:29.5 - 15:13:17.5 93 8 3C391 C7 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 15:13:18.5 - 15:15:07.5 94 1 J1822-0938 71500 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 15:15:08.5 - 15:20:26.5 95 2 3C391 C1 207350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 15:20:27.5 - 15:25:15.5 96 3 3C391 C2 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 15:25:16.5 - 15:30:05.5 97 4 3C391 C3 188500 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 15:30:06.5 - 15:34:54.5 98 5 3C391 C4 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 15:34:55.5 - 15:39:43.5 99 6 3C391 C5 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 15:39:44.5 - 15:44:32.5 100 7 3C391 C6 187850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 15:44:33.5 - 15:49:22.5 101 8 3C391 C7 188500 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 15:49:23.5 - 15:51:11.5 102 1 J1822-0938 70850 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 15:51:12.5 - 16:00:10.5 103 9 J0319+4130 350350 1 [0, 1]
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary (nVis = Total number of time/baseline visibilities per scan)
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary Fields: 10
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ ID Code Name RA Decl Epoch SrcId nVis
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 0 N J1331+3030 13:31:08.2880 +30.30.32.9589 J2000 0 774800
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 1 J J1822-0938 18:22:28.7042 -09.38.56.8350 J2000 1 1361750
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 2 NONE 3C391 C1 18:49:24.2440 -00.55.40.5800 J2000 2 2488850
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 3 NONE 3C391 C2 18:49:29.1490 -00.57.48.0000 J2000 3 2280850
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 4 NONE 3C391 C3 18:49:19.3390 -00.57.48.0000 J2000 4 2282150
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 5 NONE 3C391 C4 18:49:14.4340 -00.55.40.5800 J2000 5 2282150
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 6 NONE 3C391 C5 18:49:19.3390 -00.53.33.1600 J2000 6 2281500
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 7 NONE 3C391 C6 18:49:29.1490 -00.53.33.1600 J2000 7 2281500
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 8 NONE 3C391 C7 18:49:34.0540 -00.55.40.5800 J2000 8 2282150
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 9 Z J0319+4130 03:19:48.1601 +41.30.42.1030 J2000 9 350350
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ (nVis = Total number of time/baseline visibilities per field)
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary Spectral Windows: (2 unique spectral windows and 1 unique polarization setups)
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ SpwID #Chans Frame Ch1(MHz) ChanWid(kHz)TotBW(kHz) Ref(MHz) Corrs
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 0 64 TOPO 4536 2000 128000 4536 RR RL LR LL
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 1 64 TOPO 7436 2000 128000 7436 RR RL LR LL
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary Sources: 20
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ ID Name SpwId RestFreq(MHz) SysVel(km/s)
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 0 J1331+3030 0 - -
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 0 J1331+3030 1 - -
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 1 J1822-0938 0 - -
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 1 J1822-0938 1 - -
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 2 3C391 C1 0 - -
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 2 3C391 C1 1 - -
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 3 3C391 C2 0 - -
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 3 3C391 C2 1 - -
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 4 3C391 C3 0 - -
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 4 3C391 C3 1 - -
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 5 3C391 C4 0 - -
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 5 3C391 C4 1 - -
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 6 3C391 C5 0 - -
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 6 3C391 C5 1 - -
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 7 3C391 C6 0 - -
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 7 3C391 C6 1 - -
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 8 3C391 C7 0 - -
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 8 3C391 C7 1 - -
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 9 J0319+4130 0 - -
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 9 J0319+4130 1 - -
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary Antennas: 26:
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ ID Name Station Diam. Long. Lat.
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 0 ea01 W09 25.0 m -107.37.25.2 +33.53.51.0
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 1 ea02 E02 25.0 m -107.37.04.4 +33.54.01.1
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 2 ea03 E09 25.0 m -107.36.45.1 +33.53.53.6
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 3 ea04 W01 25.0 m -107.37.05.9 +33.54.00.5
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 4 ea05 W08 25.0 m -107.37.21.6 +33.53.53.0
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 5 ea07 N06 25.0 m -107.37.06.9 +33.54.10.3
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 6 ea08 N01 25.0 m -107.37.06.0 +33.54.01.8
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 7 ea09 E06 25.0 m -107.36.55.6 +33.53.57.7
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 8 ea11 E04 25.0 m -107.37.00.8 +33.53.59.7
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 9 ea12 E08 25.0 m -107.36.48.9 +33.53.55.1
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 10 ea13 N07 25.0 m -107.37.07.2 +33.54.12.9
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 11 ea14 E05 25.0 m -107.36.58.4 +33.53.58.8
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 12 ea15 W06 25.0 m -107.37.15.6 +33.53.56.4
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 13 ea16 W02 25.0 m -107.37.07.5 +33.54.00.9
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 14 ea17 W07 25.0 m -107.37.18.4 +33.53.54.8
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 15 ea18 N09 25.0 m -107.37.07.8 +33.54.19.0
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 16 ea19 W04 25.0 m -107.37.10.8 +33.53.59.1
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 17 ea20 N05 25.0 m -107.37.06.7 +33.54.08.0
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 18 ea21 E01 25.0 m -107.37.05.7 +33.53.59.2
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 19 ea22 N04 25.0 m -107.37.06.5 +33.54.06.1
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 20 ea23 E07 25.0 m -107.36.52.4 +33.53.56.5
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 21 ea24 W05 25.0 m -107.37.13.0 +33.53.57.8
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 22 ea25 N02 25.0 m -107.37.06.2 +33.54.03.5
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 23 ea26 W03 25.0 m -107.37.08.9 +33.54.00.1
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 24 ea27 E03 25.0 m -107.37.02.8 +33.54.00.5
| |
| INFO listobs::ms::summary+ 25 ea28 N08 25.0 m -107.37.07.5 +33.54.15.8
| |
| INFO listobs::::casa
| |
| INFO listobs::::casa ##### End Task: listobs #####
| |
| INFO listobs::::casa ##########################################
| |
| </pre>
| |
| | |
| Note that the antenna IDs (which are numbered sequentially up to the total number of antennas in the array; 0 through 25 in this instance) do not correspond to the actual antenna names (ea01 through ea28; these numbers correspond to those painted on the side of the dishes). During our data reduction, we can refer to the antennas using either convention; ''antenna='22' '' would correspond to ea25, whereas ''antenna='ea22' '' would correspond to ea22. Note that the antenna numbers in the observer log correspond to the actual antenna names, i.e. the 'ea??' numbers given in listobs.
| |
| | |
| Both to get a sense of the array, as well as identify an antenna for later use in calibration, use the task {{plotants}}. In general, for calibration purposes, one would like to select an antenna that is close to the center of the array (and that is not listed in the operator's log as having had problems!).
| |
| | |
| <source lang="python">
| |
| # In CASA
| |
| plotants(vis='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.ms',figfile='3c391_ctm_mosaic_antenna_layout.png')
| |
| clearstat() # This removes the table lock generated by plotants in script mode
| |
| </source>
| |
| | |
| [[Image:3c391_ctm_plotants_parameters.jpg|200px|thumb|left|plotants parameters]]
| |
| [[Image:3C391_mosaic-plotants.png|200px|thumb|center|plotants figure]]
| |
| | |
| == Examining and Editing the Data ==
| |
| | |
| It is always a good idea, particularly with a new system like the EVLA, to examine the data. Moreover, from the observer's log, we already know that one antenna will need to be flagged because it does not have a C-band receiver. Start by flagging data known to be bad, then examine the data.
| |
| | |
| In its current operation, it is common to insert a dummy scan as the first scan. (From the {{listobs}} output above, one may have noticed that the first scan is less than 1 minute long.) This first scan can safely be deleted.
| |
| <source lang="python">
| |
| # In CASA
| |
| flagdata(vis='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.ms',flagbackup=T,mode='manualflag',selectdata=T,scan='1')
| |
| </source>
| |
| | |
| [[Image:3C391_flagdata.png|200px|thumb|right|flagdata inputs]]
| |
| * <strong>flagbackup=T</strong> : A comment is warranted on the setting of flagbackup (here set to T or True). If set to True, {{flagdata}} will save a copy of the existing set of flags <em>before</em> entering any new flags. The setting of flagbackup is therefore a matter of some taste. One could choose not to save any flags or only save "major" flags, or one could save every flag. (One of the authors of this document was glad that flagbackup was set to True as he recently ran {{flagdata}} with a typo in one of the entries.)
| |
| * <strong>mode='manualflag'</strong> : Specific data are going to be selected to be edited.
| |
| * <strong>selectdata=T</strong> : In order to select the specific data to be flagged, selectdata has to be set to True. Once selectdata is set to True, then the various data selection options become visible (use ''help flagdata'' to see the possible options). In this case, scan='1' is chosen to select only the first scan. Note that scan expects an entry in the form of a <em>string</em>. (scan=1 would generate an error.)
| |
| | |
| If satisfied with the inputs, run this task. The initial display in the logger will include
| |
| <pre style="background-color: #ffe4b5;">
| |
| ##########################################
| |
| ##### Begin Task: flagdata #####
| |
| flagdata::::casa
| |
| attached MS [...]
| |
| Saving current flags to manualflag_1 before applying new flags
| |
| Creating new backup flag file called manualflag_1
| |
| </pre>
| |
| which indicates that, among other things, the flags that existed in the data set prior to this run will be saved to another file called manualflag_1. Should one ever desire to revert to the data prior to this run, the task {{flagmanager}} could be used.
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| From the observer's log, we know that antenna ea13 does not have a C band receiver and antenna ea15 had some corrupted data, so they should be flagged as well. The parameters are similar as before.
| |
| <source lang="python">
| |
| # In CASA
| |
| flagdata(vis='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.ms',flagbackup=T,mode='manualflag',selectdata=T,antenna='ea13,ea15')
| |
| </source>
| |
| * antenna='ea13,ea15' : Once again, this parameter requires a string input. Remember that antenna='ea13' and 'antenna='13' are <em>not</em> the same antenna. (See the discussion after our call to {{listobs}} above.)
| |
| | |
| | |
| Finally, it is common for the array to require a small amount of time to "settle down" at the start of a scan. Consequently, it has become standard practice to edit out the initial samples from the start of each scan.
| |
| | |
| <source lang="python">
| |
| # In CASA
| |
| flagdata(vis='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.ms',mode='quack',quackinterval=10.0,quackmode='beg')
| |
| </source>
| |
| * mode='quack' : Quack is another mode in which the same edit will be applied to all scans for all baselines.
| |
| * quackmode='beg' : In this case, data from the start of each scan will be flagged. Other options include flagging data at the end of the scan.
| |
| * quackinterval=10 : In this data set, the sampling time is 10 seconds, so this choice flags the first sample from all scans on all baselines.
| |
| | |
| | |
| Having now done some basic editing of the data, based in part on <i>a priori</i> information, it is time to look at the data to determine if there are any other obvious problems. One task to examine the data themselves is {{plotms}}.
| |
| | |
| <source lang="python">
| |
| # In CASA
| |
| clearstat() # This removes any existing table locks generated by flagdata
| |
| plotms(vis='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.ms',xaxis='',yaxis='',averagedata=False,transform=False,extendflag=False,
| |
| plotfile='',selectdata=True,field='0')
| |
| </source>
| |
| | |
| [[Image:3C391_plotms.png|200px|thumb|right|plotms inputs]]
| |
| * xaxis=' ', yaxis=' ' : One can choose the axes of the plot, i.e., the way of visualizing the data, by using the GUI display once the task is executed.
| |
| * averagedata=F : It is possible to average the data in time, frequency, etc.
| |
| * transform=F : It is possible to change the velocity reference frame of the data.
| |
| * extendflag=F : It is possible to "extend" a flag, i.e., flag data surrounding bad data. For example, one might want to flag spectral channels surrounding a bad spectral channel or one might want to flag cross-polarization data if one flags the parallel polarization data.
| |
| * plotfile=' ' : It is possible to produce a hard copy (e.g., for a paper, report, or Web site) by specifying a file.
| |
| * selectdata=T : One can choose to plot only subsets of the data.
| |
| * field='0': The entire dataset is rather large, and different sources have very different amplitudes, so it is advisable to start by loading a subset of the data. One can later loop through the different fields (i.e. sources) and spectral windows using the GUI interface.
| |
| | |
| In this case, many other values have been left to defaults as it is also possible to select them from within the {{plotms}} GUI. Review the inputs, then run the task.
| |
| | |
| {{plotms}} should produce a GUI, with the default view being to show the visibility amplitude as a function of time. The figure at right shows the result of running {{plotms}} without the field selection (''field='0' '') discussed above.
| |
| [[Image:plotms-default.png|200px|right|thumb|plotms default GUI view, having loaded all fields at once]]
| |
| {{plotms}} allows one to select and view the data in many ways. Across the top of the left panel are a set of tabs labeled 'Plots', 'Flagging', 'Tools', 'Annotator', and 'Options'. If one selects the 'Flagging' tab, the option is to 'Extend flags'. Thus, even though {{plotms}} was started with extendflag=F, if one decides that it does make sense to extend the flags, one can still do so here.
| |
| | |
| In the default view, the 'Plots' tab is visible, and there are a number of tabs running down the side of the left hand panel, including 'Data', 'Axes', 'Trans', 'Cache', 'Display', 'Canvas', and 'Export'. Once again, one can make changes on the fly. Thus, supposing that one wants to save a hard copy, even if {{plotms}} was started with plotfile=' ', one can select 'Export' and enter a file name in which to save a copy of a plot.
| |
| | |
| One should spend several minutes displaying the data in various formats. For instance, one could select the 'Data' tab and specify field 0 (source J1331+3030, a.k.a. 3C 286) to display data associated with the amplitude calibrator, then select the 'Axes' tab and change the x axis to be UVDist (baseline length, in meters), and plot the data. The result should be that of the first thumbnail image shown below. The amplitude distribution is relatively constant as a function of u-v distance or baseline length (i.e., <math>\sqrt{u^2+v^2}</math>). From the various lectures, one should recognize that a relatively constant visibility amplitude as a function of baseline length means that the source is very nearly a point source. (The Fourier transform of a constant is a delta function, a.k.a. a point source.)
| |
| | |
| By contrast, if one selects field 3 (one of the 3C 391 fields) in the 'Data' tab and plots these data, one sees a visibility function that falls rapidly with increasing baseline length. Such a visibility function indicates a highly resolved source. By noting the baseline length at which the visibility function falls to some fiducial value (e.g., 1/2 of its peak value), one can obtain a rough estimate of the angular scale of the source. (From the lectures, angular scale [in radians] ~ 1/baseline [in wavelengths]. To plot baseline length in wavelengths rather than meters, one needs to select ''UVDist_L'' as the x-axis in the {{plotms}} GUI.)
| |
| | |
| | |
| [[Image:plotms-3C286-UVDist_vs_Amp.png|200px|left|thumb|plotms view of 3C 286]]
| |
| [[Image:plotms-3C391-UVDist_vs_Amp.png|200px|center|thumb|plotms view of 3C 391]]
| |
| | |
| | |
| As a general data editing and examination strategy, at this stage in the data reduction process, one wants to focus on the calibrators. The data reduction strategy is to determine various corrections from the calibrators, then apply these correction factors to the science data. The 3C 286 data look relatively clean. There are no wildly egregious data (e.g., amplitudes that are 100,000x larger than the rest of the data). One may notice that there are antenna-to-antenna variations (under the 'Display' tab, select 'Colorize by Antenna1'). These antenna-to-antenna variations are acceptable, that's what calibration will help determine.
| |
| | |
| '''Do not''' close the plotms GUI after running {{plotms}}, or you will need to exit casapy and restart if at any point you wish to run plotms again, otherwise the GUI will not come up a second time.
| |
| | |
| == Calibrating the Data ==
| |
| | |
| It is now time to begin calibrating the data. The general data reduction strategy is to derive a series of scaling factors or corrections from the calibrators, which are then collectively applied to the science data.
| |
| For <em>much</em> more discussion of the philosophy, strategy, and implementation of calibration of synthesis data within CASA, see [http://casa.nrao.edu/docs/userman/UserManch4.html#x177-1740004 Synthesis Calibration] in the CASA Reference Manual.
| |
| | |
| Recall that the observed visibility <math>V^{\prime}</math> between two antennas <math>(i,j)</math> is related to the "true" visibility <math>V</math> by
| |
| | |
| <math>
| |
| V^{\prime}_{i,j}(u,v,f) = b_{ij}(t)\,[B_i(f,t) B^{*}_j(f,t)]\,g_i(t) g_j(t)\,V_{i,j}(u,v,f)\,e^{i [\theta_i(t) - \theta_j(t)]}
| |
| </math>
| |
| | |
| Here, for generality, we show the visibility as a function of frequency <math>f</math> and spatial wavenumbers <math>u</math> and <math>v</math>. The other terms are
| |
| * <math>g_i</math> and <math>\theta_i</math> are the amplitude and phase portions of what is commonly termed the complex gain. They are shown separately here because they are usually determined separately. For completeness, these are shown as a function of time <math>t</math> to indicate that they can change with temperature, atmospheric conditions, etc.
| |
| * <math>B_i</math> is the complex bandpass, the instrumental response as a function of frequency, <math>f</math>. As shown here, the bandpass may also vary as a function of time.
| |
| * <math>b(t)</math> is the often-neglected baseline term. It can be important to include for the highest dynamic range images or shortly after a configuration change at the [E]VLA, when antenna positions may not be known well.
| |
| Strictly, the equation above is a simplification of a more general measurement equation formalism, but it is a useful simplification in many cases.
| |
| | |
| For safety or sanity, one can begin by "clearing the calibration." In CASA, the data structure is that the observed data are stored in a DATA column, estimates of the data (e.g., a priori models for the calibrators, and those derived from the self-calibration process to be done later) are stored in the MODEL_DATA column, and the calibrated data are stored in the CORRECTED_DATA column. The task clearcal initializes the MODEL_DATA and CORRECTED_DATA and sets up some scratch data columns as well. For a pristine data set, straight from the Archive, clearcal probably should not be required; clearcal could be quite important if one decides later that a horrible mistake has been made in the calibration process and one wishes to start over. If you have started with the 10s-averaged dataset suggested at the top of this tutorial, this step has already been done for you, so may be omitted.
| |
| | |
| <source lang="python">
| |
| # In CASA
| |
| clearcal(vis='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.ms',field='',spw='')
| |
| </source>
| |
| | |
| All parameters are set to blank so that the initialization occurs for all sources and spectral windows.
| |
| | |
| === <i>A priori</i> Antenna Position Corrections ===
| |
| | |
| As mentioned in the observing log above, antennas ea10, ea12, and ea22 do not have good baseline positions. Antenna ea10 was not in the array, but, for the other two antennas, any improved baseline positions need to be incorporated. The importance of this step is that the visibility function is a function of <math>u</math> and <math>v</math>. If the baseline positions are incorrect, then <math>u</math> and <math>v</math> will be calculated incorrectly, and there will be errors in the image. (These corrections could also be determined later by a baseline-based calibration incorporating the <math>b_{ij}</math> term from the equation above, but since they are known <i>a priori</i> it makes sense to incorporate them now.)
| |
| | |
| Any corrections can be ascertained from the [http://www.vla.nrao.edu/astro/archive/baselines/ EVLA/VLA Baseline Corrections] site. For future reference, be sure to read to the bottom of that document to see how to calculate the additive corrections. Fortunately, the current case is simple as there is only a single correction for each antenna. The calculations are inserted via [[gencal]]. Currently these must be done by hand, though the plan is for future releases of CASA to have an automated lookup of the corrections.
| |
| | |
| <source lang="python">
| |
| # In CASA
| |
| gencal(vis='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.ms',caltable='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.antpos',
| |
| caltype='antpos',
| |
| antenna='ea12,ea22',
| |
| parameter=[-0.0072,0.0045,-0.0017, -0.0220,0.0040,-0.0190])
| |
| </source>
| |
| | |
| [[Image:gencal.jpg|200px|thumb|right|gencal inputs]]
| |
| * caltable='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.antpos' : CASA adopts a strategy of storing corrections in external tables. These can then be applied "on the fly" in future calibration steps, if warranted.
| |
| * caltype='antpos' : [[gencal]] can incorporate several types of corrections, in this case corrections to antenna positions are specified.
| |
| * antenna='ea12,ea22' : The two antennas for which corrections are to be specified.
| |
| * parameter=[-0.0072,0.0045,-0.0017, -0.0220,0.0040,-0.0190] : The actual corrections to be applied. As suggested by the spacing in the listing, the first 3 parameters are for antenna ea12 and the second 3 parameters are for antenna ea22. The expected unit for antenna positions corrections for the EVLA is meters.
| |
| | |
| === Flux Density Scale ===
| |
| | |
| The next step is to provide a flux density value for the amplitude calibrator J1331+3030 (a.k.a. 3C 286). For the VLA, the ultimate flux density scale at most frequencies was set by 3C 295, which was then transferred to a small number of "primary flux density calibrators," including 3C 286. For the EVLA, at the time of this writing, the flux density scale at most frequencies will be determined from WMAP observations of the planet Mars, in turn then transferred to a small number of primary flux density calibrators. Thus, the procedure is to assume that the flux density of a primary calibrator source is known and, by comparison with the observed data for that calibrator, determine the <math>g_i</math> values.
| |
| | |
| <source lang="python">
| |
| # In CASA
| |
| setjy(vis='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.ms',field='J1331+3030',
| |
| modimage='/home/casa/data/nrao/VLA/CalModels/3C286_C.im',standard='Perley-Taylor 99',
| |
| fluxdensity=-1)
| |
| </source>
| |
| | |
| [[Image:3C391_setjy.png|200px|thumb|right|setjy inputs]]
| |
| * field='J1331+3030' : Clearly one has to specify what the flux density calibrator is, otherwise <em>all</em> sources will be assumed to have the same flux density.
| |
| * modimage='/home/casa/data/nrao/VLA/CalModels/3C286_C.im' : Although above, from plotms, it was estimated that 3C 286 is roughly a point source, depending upon the frequency and configuration, the source may be slightly resolved. Fiducial model images have been determined from a painstaking set of observations, and, if one is available, it should be used to compensate for slight resolution effects. In this case, spectral window 0 (at 4.536 GHz) is in the C band, so the C-band model image is used. The location of the model images is <strong>site-dependent</strong>. The above shows the location for the Array Operations Center/Dominici Science Operations Center. (For the <strong>2010 Synthesis Imaging Workshop</strong>, at Weir and Speare, the location is likely to be <tt>/nrao/data/nrao/VLA/CalModels</tt>.)
| |
| * standard='Perley-Taylor 99' : Periodically, the flux density scale at the VLA was revised, updated, or expanded. The specified value represents the most recent determination of the flux density scale (by R. Perley and G. Taylor in 1999); older scales can also be specified, and might be important if, for example, one was attempting to conduct a careful comparison with a previously published result.
| |
| * fluxdensity=-1 : It is possible to specify (i.e., force) the flux density of the source to be a particular value. Setting ''fluxdensity = -1'' (as done here) asks {{setjy}} to calculate the value based on a set of standard models if the source is one of the standard flux calibrators (i.e. 3C 286, 3C 48, or 3C 147).
| |
| * spw='0' : The original data contained two spectral windows. Having split off spectral window 0, it is not necessary to specify spw, but it will not hurt to do so. Had the spectral window 0 not been split off, as has been done here, we might wish to specify the spectral window because, in this observation, the spectral windows were sufficiently separated that two different model images for 3C 286 would be appropriate; 3C286_C.im at 4.6 GHz and 3C286_X.im at 7.5 GHz. This would require two separate runs of {{setjy}}, one for each spectral window. If the spectral windows were much closer together, it might be possible to calibrate both using the same model.
| |
| | |
| In this case, a model image of a primary flux density calibrator exists. However, for some kinds of polarization calibration or in extreme situations (e.g., there are problems with the scan on the flux density calibrator), it can be useful or required to set the flux density of the source explicitly.
| |
| | |
| The output from {{setjy}} should look similar to the following.
| |
| <pre style="background-color: #ffe4b5;">
| |
| INFO taskmanager::::casa ##### async task launch: setjy ########################
| |
| INFO setjy::imager::setjy() J1331+3030 spwid= 0 [I=7.747, Q=0, U=0, V=0] Jy, (Perley-Taylor 99)
| |
| INFO setjy::imager::setjy() Using model image /home/casa/data/nrao/VLA/CalModels/3C286_C.im
| |
| INFO setjy::imager::setjy() The model image's reference pixel is 0.00302169 arcsec from J1331+3030's phase center.
| |
| INFO setjy::imager::setjy() Scaling model image to I=7.74664 Jy for visibility prediction.
| |
| INFO setjy::imager::data selection Selecting data
| |
| </pre>
| |
| As set, the flux density scale is being set only for spectral window 0 (''spw='0' ''). The flux density at the center of the spectral window is reported. This value is determined from an analytical formula for the spectrum of the source as a function of frequency; this value must be determined so that the flux density in the image can be scaled to it, as it is unlikely that the observation was taken at exactly the same frequency as the model image.
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| === Bandpass Calibration ===
| |
| | |
| In this step one solves for the complex bandpass, <math>B_i</math>.
| |
| [[Image:plotms-3C286-RRbandpass.png|200px|thumb|right|bandpass illustration]]
| |
| For the VLA, in its old continuum modes, this step could be skipped. With the EVLA, all data are spectral line, even if the science that one is conducting is continuum. Solving for the bandpass won't hurt for continuum data, and, for moderate or high dynamic range image, it is essential. To motivate the need for solving for the bandpass, consider the image to the right. It shows the right circularly polarized data (RR polarization) for the source J1331+3030, which will serve as the bandpass calibrator. The data are color coded by scan, and they are averaged over all baselines, as earlier plots from {{plotms}} indicated that the visibility data are nearly constant with baseline length. Ideally, the visibility data would be constant as a function of frequency as well. The variations with frequency are a reflection of the (slightly) different antenna bandpasses. (<em>Exercise for the reader, reproduce this plot using {{plotms}}.</em>)
| |
| | |
| Depending upon frequency and configuration, there could be gain variations between the different scans of the bandpass calibrator, particularly if the scans happen at much different elevations. One can solve for an initial set of antenna-based gains, which will later be discarded, in order to moderate the effects of gain variations from scan to scan on the bandpass calibrator. While amplitude variations will have little effect on the bandpass solutions, it is important to solve for any phase variations with time to prevent decorrelation when vector averaging the data in computing the bandpass solutions.
| |
| <source lang="python">
| |
| # In CASA
| |
| gaincal(vis='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.ms',caltable='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.G0',field='J1331+3030',
| |
| refant='ea21',spw='0:27~36',calmode='p',solint='int',minsnr=5,solnorm=T,
| |
| gaintable=['3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.antpos'])
| |
| </source>
| |
| | |
| [[Image:3C391_gaincal0.png|200px|thumb|right|gaincal inputs for first gain solutions]]
| |
| * caltable='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.G0' : The gain solutions will be stored in an external table.
| |
| * field='J1331+3030' : Specify the bandpass calibrator. In this case, the bandpass calibrator and the amplitude calibrator happen to be the same source, but it is not always so.
| |
| * refant='ea21' : Earlier, by looking at the output from {{plotants}}, a <em>reference antenna</em> near the center of the array was noted. Here is the first time that that choice will be used. Strictly, all of the gain corrections derived will be <em>relative</em> to this reference antenna.
| |
| * spw='0:27~36': One wants to choose a subset of the channels from which to determine the gain corrections. These should be near the center of the band, and there should be enough channels chosen so that a reasonable signal-to-noise ratio can be obtained. (See the output of {{plotms}} above.) Particularly at lower frequencies where RFI can manifest itself, one should choose RFI-free frequency channels. Also note that, even though these data have only a single spectral window, the syntax requires specifying the spectral window in order to specify the spectral channels.
| |
| * calmode='p' : Solve for only the phase portion of the gain.
| |
| * solint='int' : One wants to be able to track the phases, so a short solution interval is chosen. (A single integration time or 10 seconds for this case)
| |
| * minsnr=5 : One probably wants to restrict the solutions to be at relatively high signal-to-noise ratios, although this parameter may need to be varied depending upon the source and frequency.
| |
| * solnorm=T : Strictly, for a phase-only solution, the amplitudes should be normalized by zero. This setting enforces that.
| |
| * gaintable=['3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.antpos'] : Having produced antenna position corrections, they should now be applied.
| |
| One can now examine the phase solutions using {{plotcal}}. The inputs shown below plot the phase portion of the gain solutions as a function of time for the calibrator for R and L polarization separately.
| |
| <source lang="python">
| |
| # In CASA
| |
| plotcal(caltable='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.G0',xaxis='time',yaxis='phase',poln='R',field='J1331+3030',spw='',
| |
| figfile='plotcal-3C286-G0-phase-R.png')
| |
| </source>
| |
| <source lang="python">
| |
| # In CASA
| |
| plotcal(caltable='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.g0',xaxis='time',yaxis='phase',poln='L',field='J1331+3030',spw='',
| |
| figfile='plotcal-3C286-G0-phase-L.png')
| |
| </source>
| |
| Inspection of the resulting plots (shown below, <em>exercise for the reader, reproduce these plots</em>) shows that the phase is relatively stable within a scan, but does vary from scan to scan. If {{plotcal}} is run interactively, with the GUI, one can select sub-regions within the plot and zoom into them to look at the phase in more detail.
| |
| [[Image:plotcal-3C286-G0-phase-R.png|200px|thumb|left|gain phases for 3C 286, R polarization]]
| |
| [[Image:plotcal-3C286-G0-phase-L.png|200px|thumb|center|gain phases for 3C 286, L polarization]]
| |
| | |
| | |
| Alternatively, one can choose to inspect solutions for a single antenna at a time, stepping through each antenna in sequence:
| |
| <source lang="python">
| |
| plotcal(caltable='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0_10s_spw0.g0',
| |
| xaxis='time',yaxis='phase',poln='R',field='J1331+3030',iteration='antenna',
| |
| plotrange=[-1,-1,-180,180],timerange='08:02:00~08:17:00')
| |
| </source>
| |
| Antennas that have been flagged will show a blank plot, as there are no solutions for these antennas. Note the phase jump on antenna ea05. You may wish to flag this antenna:
| |
| <source lang="python">
| |
| flagdata(vis='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.ms',
| |
| flagbackup=T,mode='manualflag',selectdata=T,antenna='ea05',field='J1331+3030',timerange='08:02:00~08:17:00')
| |
| </source>
| |
| | |
| Now form the bandpass itself, using the phase solutions just derived.
| |
| <source lang="python">
| |
| # In CASA
| |
| bandpass(vis='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.ms',caltable='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.B0',
| |
| field='J1331+3030',spw='',refant='ea21',solnorm=True,combine='scan',solint='inf',bandtype='B',
| |
| gaintable=['3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.antpos','3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.G0'])
| |
| </source>
| |
| | |
| [[Image:3C391_bandpass.png|200px|thumb|right|bandpass inputs]]
| |
| * caltable='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.B0' : Specify where to store the bandpass corrections.
| |
| * solnorm=T : Make sure that the amplitudes of the bandpass corrections are normalized to unity.
| |
| * solint='inf' and combine='scan' : This observation contains multiple scans on the bandpass calibrator, J1331+3030. Because these are continuum observations, it is probably acceptable to combine all the scans and compute one bandpass correction per antenna, which is achieved by the combination of solint='inf' and combine='scan'. Had combine=' ', then there would have been a bandpass correction derived per scan, which might be necessary for the highest dynamic range spectral line observations.
| |
| * bandtype='B' : The bandpass solution will be derived on a channel-by-channel basis. There is an alternate, somewhat experimental option of bandtype='BPOLY' that will attempt to fit an n-th order polynomial to the bandpass.
| |
| * gaintable=['3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.antpos','3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0_10s_spw0.G0'] : Two sets of corrections need to be applied in determining the bandpass solutions. The first is the set of antenna positions, the second are the phase solutions just derived. By specifying two values, in a python list, both tables will be applied on the fly prior to determining the bandpass solutions.
| |
| | |
| Once again, one can use {{plotcal}} to display the bandpass solutions. Note that in the {{plotcal}} inputs below, the amplitudes are being displayed as a function of frequency channel and, for compactness, ''subplot=221'' is used to display multiple plots per page. One could use ''yaxis='phase' '' to view the phases as well. We use ''iteration='antenna' '' to step through separate plots for each antenna.
| |
| <source lang="python">
| |
| # In CASA
| |
| plotcal(caltable= '3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.B0',poln='R',xaxis='chan',yaxis='amp',field= 'J1331+3030',subplot=221,
| |
| iteration='antenna',figfile='plotcal-3C286-B0-R.png')
| |
| plotcal(caltable= '3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.B0',poln='L',xaxis='chan',yaxis='amp',field= 'J1331+3030',subplot=221,
| |
| iteration='antenna',figfile='plotcal-3C286-B0-L.png')
| |
| </source>
| |
| | |
| [[Image:plotcal-3C286-G0-bandpass-R.png|200px|thumb|left|bandpass for 3C 286, R polarization]]
| |
| [[Image:plotcal-3C286-G0-bandpass-L.png|200px|thumb|center|bandpass for 3C 286, L polarization]]
| |
| | |
| === Gain Calibration ===
| |
| | |
| The next step is to derive corrections for the complex antenna gains, <math>g_i</math> and <math>\theta_i</math>. As discussed in the lectures and above, the absolute magnitude of the gain amplitudes <math>g_i</math> are determined by reference to a standard flux density calibrator. In order to determine the appropriate complex gains for the target source, one wants to observe a so-called phase calibrator that is much closer to the target, in order to minimize differences through the atmosphere (neutral and/or ionized) between the lines of sight to the phase calibrator and the target source. If we determine the relative gain amplitudes and phases for different antennas using the phase calibrator, we can later determine the absolute flux density scale by comparing the gain amplitudes <math>g_i</math> derived for 3C 286 with those derived for the phase calibrator. This will eventually be done using the task {{fluxscale}}. Since there is no such thing as absolute phase, we determine a zero phase by selecting a reference antenna for which the gain phase is defined to be zero.
| |
| | |
| In principle, one could determine the complex antenna gains for all sources with a single invocation of {{gaincal}}; for clarity here, two separate invocations will be used.
| |
| | |
| In the first step, we derive the appropriate complex gains <math>g_i</math> and <math>\theta_i</math> for the flux density calibrator 3C 286.
| |
| <source lang="python">
| |
| # In CASA
| |
| gaincal(vis='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.ms',caltable='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.G1',
| |
| field='J1331+3030',spw='0:5~58',
| |
| solint='inf',refant='ea21',gaintype='G',calmode='ap',solnorm=F,
| |
| gaintable=['3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.antpos','3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.B0'])
| |
| </source>
| |
| * caltable='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.G1' : Produce a new calibration table containing these gain solutions. In order to make the bookkeeping easier, a '1' is appended to the file name to distinguish it from the earlier set of gain solutions, which are effectively being "thrown away."
| |
| * spw='0:5~58' : From the inspection of the bandpass, one can determine the range of edge channels that are affected by the bandpass filter rolloff. Because the amplitude is dropping rapidly in these channels, one does not want to include them in the solution.
| |
| * gaintype='G', calmode='ap', solnorm=F : Solve for the complex antenna gains for 3C 286. The objective is to relate the measured data values to the (assumed known) flux density of 3C 286, thus the solution is both amplitude and phase ('ap') and the solutions should not be normalized to unity amplitude.
| |
| * solint='inf' : Produce a solution for each scan.
| |
| * gaintable=['3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.antpos','3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.B0'] : Use the antenna position corrections and bandpass solutions determined earlier before solving for the gain amplitudes.
| |
| After reviewing the inputs to {{gaincal}} and running it, one could use {{plotcal}} to plot the solutions. While a useful sanity check, the plots themselves will be rather sparse as only a single gain amplitude is being determined for each antenna for each scan.
| |
| | |
| | |
| In the second step, the appropriate complex gains for a direction on the sky close to the target source will be determined from the phase calibrator J1822-0938. We also determine the complex gains for the polarization calibrator source J0319+4130.
| |
| <source lang="python">
| |
| # In CASA
| |
| gaincal(vis='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.ms',caltable='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.G1',
| |
| field='J1822-0938,J0319+4130',
| |
| spw='0:5~58',solint='inf',refant='ea21',gaintype='G',calmode='ap',
| |
| append=True,gaintable=['3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.antpos','3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.B0'])
| |
| </source>
| |
| * caltable='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.G1' and append=True : In all previous invocations of {{gaincal}}, append has been set to False. Here, the gain solutions from the phase calibrators are going to be appended to the existing set from 3C 286. In following steps, all of these gain solutions will then be used together to derive a set of complex gains that are applied to the science data for the target source.
| |
| If one checks the gain phase solutions using {{plotcal}}, one should see several solutions for each antenna as a function of time. In order to track the phases, the phase calibrator is typically observed much more frequently during the course of an observation than is the flux density calibrator. In the examples shown below, note that one of the panels is blank, which corresponds to antenna 13, the one flagged earlier in the process.
| |
| | |
| [[Image:plotcal-J1822-0398-phase-R.png|200px|thumb|left|gain phase solutions for J1822-0398, R polarization]]
| |
| [[Image:plotcal-J1822-0398-phase-L.png|200px|thumb|center|gain phase solutions for J1822-0398, L polarization]]
| |
| | |
| === Polarization Calibration ===
| |
| | |
| <strong>[If time is running short, skip this step and proceed to
| |
| [[http://casaguides.nrao.edu/index.php?title=EVLA_Continuum_Tutorial_3C391#Applying_the_calibration Applying the Calibration]].]</strong>
| |
| | |
| Having set the complex gains, we now need to do the polarization calibration. This should be done prior to running {{fluxscale}}, since it has to run using the un-rescaled gains in the MODEL_DATA column of the measurement set. Polarization calibration is done in two steps. First, we solve for the instrumental polarization (the frequency-dependent leakage terms, or 'D-terms'), using either an unpolarized source or a source which has sufficiently good parallactic angle coverage. Second, we solve for the polarization position angle using a source with a known polarization position angle (3C 286 is recommended here).
| |
| | |
| Our initial run of {{setjy}} only set the total intensity of our flux calibrator source, 3C 286. This source is known to have a fairly stable fractional polarization of 11.2% at C-band, and a polarization position angle of 66 degrees. NRAO conducted regular monitoring of a number of polarization calibrators (including 3C 286) from 1999 through 2009. If you go to the [http://www.vla.nrao.edu/astro/calib/polar/ polarization calibration webpage] and follow the link for a particular year, then search for '1331+305 C band' (1331+305 is better known as 3C 286), you will see in the table the measured values for the percentage polarization and polarization position angle.
| |
| | |
| In order to calibrate the position angle, we need to set the appropriate values for Stokes Q and U. Examining our casapy.log file to find the output of {{setjy}}, we find that the total intensity was set to 7.74664 Jy in spw0. We therefore use python to find the polarized flux, P, and the values of Stokes Q and U.
| |
| | |
| <source lang="python">
| |
| # In CASA
| |
| i0=7.74664 # Stokes I value for spw 0
| |
| p0=0.112*i0 # Fractional polarization=11.2%
| |
| q0=p0*cos(66*pi/180) # Stokes Q for spw 0
| |
| u0=p0*sin(66*pi/180) # Stokes U for spw 0
| |
| </source>
| |
| | |
| We now set the values of Stokes Q and U for 3C 286, using {{setjy}} as we did before.
| |
| | |
| <source lang="python">
| |
| # In CASA
| |
| setjy(vis='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.ms',field='J1331+3030',modimage='',spw='0',fluxdensity=[i0,q0,u0,0])
| |
| </source>
| |
| * modimage=' ' : A model image is not used here.
| |
| | |
| Note that the Stokes V flux value is set to zero, corresponding to no circular polarization.
| |
| | |
| ==== Solving for the Leakage Terms ====
| |
| | |
| The task we will use to do all the polarization calibration is {{polcal}}. In this data set, we observed the unpolarized calibrator J0319+4130 (a.k.a. 3C 84) in order to solve for the instrumental polarization. {{polcal}} uses the Stokes IQU values in the MODEL_DATA column (Q and U being zero for our unpolarized calibrator) to derive the leakage solutions. The final function call is:
| |
| | |
| <source lang="python">
| |
| # In CASA
| |
| polcal(vis='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.ms',caltable='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.D1',
| |
| field='J0319+4130',spw='0:5~58',
| |
| refant='ea21',poltype='Df',
| |
| gaintable=['3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.antpos','3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.B0','3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.G1'])
| |
| </source>
| |
| | |
| [[Image: 3C391_polcal.png|200px|thumb|right|polcal inputs for leakage correction]]
| |
| * caltable='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.D1' : {{polcal}} will create a new calibration table containing the leakage solutions, which we specify with the ''caltable'' argument.
| |
| * field='J0319+4130' : We use the unpolarized source J0319+4130 (a.k.a. 3C 84) to solve for the leakages.
| |
| * poltype='Df' : We will solve for the leakages (''D'') on a per-channel basis (''f''). Had we have been solving for the leakages using a calibrator with unknown polarization but with good parallactic angle coverage, we would simultaneously have needed to solve for the source polarization (''poltype='Df+QU' '').
| |
| * gaintable=['3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.antpos', '3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.B0', '3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.G1'] : All of the previous corrections---antenna positions, bandpass, and complex gain---are to be applied on-the-fly by specifying them in a Python list.
| |
| | |
| After polcal has finished running, you are strongly advised to examine the solutions with {{plotcal}}, to ensure that everything looks good.
| |
| | |
| <source lang="python">
| |
| # In CASA
| |
| plotcal(caltable='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.D1',xaxis='chan',yaxis='amp',spw='',field='',iteration='antenna')
| |
| </source>
| |
| | |
| | |
| [[Image:3c391_ctm_plotcal_Df_solutions.jpg|thumb|{{plotcal}} GUI showing the Df solutions from {{polcal}} ]]
| |
| This will produce plots similar to that shown at right.
| |
| As ever, you can cycle through the antennas by clicking the "Next" button. You should see leakages of between 5 and 15% in most cases.
| |
| | |
| | |
| ==== Solving for the R-L polarization angle ====
| |
| | |
| Having calibrated the instrumental polarization, the total polarization is now correct, but we still need to calibrate the R-L phase, to get an accurate polarization position angle. We use the same task, {{polcal}}, but this time set ''poltype='Xf' '', which specifies a frequency-dependent (''f'') position angle (''X'') calibration, using the source J1331+3030 (aka 3C 286), whose position angle we know, having set this earlier using {{setjy}}. Note that we must correct for the leakages before determining the R-L phase, which we do by adding the calibration table made in the previous step (3c391_ctm_mosaic.pcal0) to the gain tables which are applied on-the-fly.
| |
| | |
| <source lang="python">
| |
| # In CASA
| |
| polcal(vis='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.ms',caltable='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.X1',
| |
| field='J1331+3030',refant='ea21',
| |
| poltype='Xf',
| |
| gaintable=['3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.antpos', '3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.B0', '3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.G1', '3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.D1'])
| |
| </source>
| |
| | |
| Again, it is strongly suggested that you check the calibration worked properly, by plotting up the newly-generated calibration table using {{plotcal}}. The results are shown at right. You will notice that when iterating, the calibration appears to be identical for all antennas.
| |
| | |
| <source lang="python">
| |
| # In CASA
| |
| plotcal(caltable='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.X1',xaxis='chan',yaxis='phase',iteration='antenna')
| |
| </source>
| |
| | |
| [[Image:3c391_ctm_plotcal_Xf_solutions.jpg|thumb|{{plotcal}} GUI showing Xf solutions from {{polcal}} ]]
| |
| | |
| At this point, your dataset contains all the necessary polarization calibration, which will shortly be applied to the data.
| |
| | |
| == Applying the Calibration ==
| |
| | |
| While we know the flux density of our primary calibrator (in our case, J1331+3030<math>\equiv</math>3C 286), the model assumed for the secondary calibrator (here, J1822-0938) was a point source of 1 Jy located at the phase center. While the secondary calibrator was chosen to be a point source (at least, over some limited range of ''uv''-distance; see [http://www.vla.nrao.edu/astro/calib/manual/csource.html the VLA calibrator manual] for any ''u''-''v'' restrictions on your calibrator of choice at the observing frequency), its absolute flux density is unknown. Being pointlike, secondary calibrators typically vary on timescales of months to years, in some cases by up to 50--100%. A nice [http://www.vla.nrao.edu/astro/calib/flux/ Java Applet] is available to track the flux density history of various calibrators over time. Play around with it to see how much some of the calibrators from the manual can vary, and over what sorts of timescales.
| |
| | |
| We use the primary calibrator (the 'flux calibrator') to determine the system response to a source of known flux density, and assume that the mean gain amplitudes for the primary calibrator are the same as those for the secondary calibrator. This then allows us to find the true flux density of the secondary calibrator. To do this, we use the task {{fluxscale}}, which produces a new calibration table containing properly-scaled amplitude gains for the secondary calibrator.
| |
| | |
| <source lang="python">
| |
| # In CASA
| |
| fluxscale(vis='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.ms',caltable='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.G1',fluxtable='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.fluxscale1',
| |
| reference=['J1331+3030'],transfer=['J1822-0938,J0319+4130'])
| |
| </source>
| |
| | |
| * caltable='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.G1' : We provide {{fluxscale}} with the calibration table containing the amplitude gain solutions derived earlier.
| |
| * fluxtable='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.fluxscale1' : We specify the name of the new output table to be written, which will contain the properly-scaled amplitude gains.
| |
| * reference='J1331+3030' : We specify the source with the known flux density.
| |
| * transfer=['J1822-0938,J0319+4130'] : We specify the sources whose amplitude gains are to be rescaled.
| |
| | |
| {{fluxscale}} will print to the CASA logger the derived flux densities of all calibrator sources specified with the ''transfer'' argument. You should examine the output to ensure that it looks sensible. If one's data set has more than 1 spectral window, depending upon where they are spaced and the spectrum of the source, it is quite possible to find (quite) different flux densities at the different frequencies for the secondary calibrators. Example output would be
| |
| | |
| <pre style="background-color: #fffacd;">
| |
| INFO fluxscale::::casa ##########################################
| |
| INFO fluxscale::::casa ##### Begin Task: fluxscale #####
| |
| INFO fluxscale::::casa
| |
| INFO fluxscale::calibrater::open Opening MS: 3c391_mosaic_10s.ms for calibration.
| |
| INFO fluxscale::Calibrater:: Initializing nominal selection to the whole MS.
| |
| INFO fluxscale::calibrater::fluxscale Beginning fluxscale--(MSSelection version)-------
| |
| INFO fluxscale:::: Found reference field(s): J1331+3030
| |
| INFO fluxscale:::: Found transfer field(s): J1822-0938 J0319+4130
| |
| INFO fluxscale:::: Flux density for J1822-0938 in SpW=0 is: 2.32824 +/- 0.00706023 (SNR = 329.768, nAnt= 25)
| |
| INFO fluxscale:::: Flux density for J0319+4130 in SpW=0 is: 13.7643 +/- 0.0348429 (SNR = 395.04, nAnt= 25)
| |
| INFO fluxscale::Calibrater::fluxscale Appending result to 3c391_mosaic.fluxscale1
| |
| INFO fluxscale:::: Appending solutions to table: 3c391_mosaic.fluxscale1
| |
| INFO fluxscale::::casa
| |
| INFO fluxscale::::casa ##### End Task: fluxscale #####
| |
| </pre>
| |
| | |
| The [http://www.vla.nrao.edu/astro/calib/manual/csource.html VLA calibrator manual] can be used to check whether the derived flux densities look sensible. Wildly different flux densities or flux densities with very high error bars should be treated with suspicion; in such cases you will have to figure out whether something has gone wrong.
| |
| | |
| Now that we have derived all the calibration solutions, we need to apply them to the actual data, using the task {{applycal}}. The measurement set contains three data columns; DATA, MODEL_DATA, and CORRECTED_DATA. The DATA column contains the original data. The MODEL_DATA column contains whatever model we used for the calibration; for J1331+3030, this is what we specified in {{setjy}}, and for all other sources, this was set to a point source of 1 Jy at the phase center when the scratch columns were originally created using {{clearcal}}. To apply the calibration we have so painstakingly derived, we specify the appropriate calibration tables, which are then applied to the DATA column, with the results being written in the CORRECTED_DATA column.
| |
| | |
| First, we apply the calibration to each individual calibrator, using the gain solutions derived on that calibrator alone to compute the CORRECTED_DATA. To do this, we iterate over the different calibrators, in each case specifying the source to be calibrated (using the ''field'' parameter). The relevant function calls are given below, although as explained presently, the calls to {{applycal}} will differ slightly if you skipped the [[http://casaguides.nrao.edu/index.php?title=EVLA_Continuum_Tutorial_3C391#Polarization_Calibration Polarization Calibration]].
| |
| | |
| <source lang="python">
| |
| # In CASA
| |
| applycal(vis='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.ms',
| |
| gaintable=['3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.antpos', '3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.fluxscale1','3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.B0','3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.D1','3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.X1'],
| |
| parang=True,field='J1331+3030',gainfield=['','J1331+3030','','',''],interp=['','nearest','','',''],calwt=F)
| |
| #
| |
| applycal(vis='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.ms',
| |
| gaintable=['3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.antpos', '3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.fluxscale1','3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.B0','3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.D1','3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.X1'],
| |
| parang=True,field='J0319+4130',gainfield=['','J0319+4130','','',''],interp=['','nearest','','',''],calwt=F)
| |
| #
| |
| applycal(vis='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.ms',
| |
| gaintable=['3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.antpos', '3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.fluxscale1','3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.B0','3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.D1','3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.X1'],
| |
| parang=True,field='J1822-0938',gainfield=['','J1822-0938','','',''],interp=['','nearest','','',''],calwt=F)
| |
| </source>
| |
| | |
| * gaintable : We provide a Python list of the calibration tables to be applied. This list must contain the antenna position corrections (in 3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.antpos), the properly-scaled gain calibration for the amplitudes and phases (in 3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.fluxscale1) which were just made using {{fluxscale}}, the bandpass solutions (in 3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.B0), the leakage calibration (in 3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.D1), and the R-L phase corrections (in 3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.X1). While the latter three tables were derived using a particular calibrator source, the table containing the gain solutions for amplitude and phase was derived separately for each individual calibrator.
| |
| * gainfield, interp : To ensure that we use the correct gain amplitudes and phases for a given calibrator (those derived on that same calibrator), then for each calibrator source, we need to specify the particular subset of gain solutions to be applied. This requires use of the ''gainfield'' and ''interp'' arguments; these are both Python lists, and for the list item corresponding to the calibration table made by {{fluxscale}}, we set ''gainfield'' to the field name corresponding to that calibrator, and the desired interpolation type (''interp'') to ''nearest''.
| |
| * parang : Since we have performed polarization calibration, we '''must''' set ''parang=True'', or we will discard all that hard work we did earlier. However, if you skipped the [[http://casaguides.nrao.edu/index.php?title=EVLA_Continuum_Tutorial_3C391#Polarization_Calibration Polarization_Calibration]] section, the tables 3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.D1 and 3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.X1 will not exist. In this case, you should leave out the final two tables in the ''gaintable'' list, and the final two sets of empty elements in the ''gainfield'' list each time you run {{applycal}} above. You should also set ''parang=False''.
| |
| * calwt=F : At the time of writing, the EVLA is not yet recording real weights, thus trying to calibrate them can produce nonsensical results. In particular, experience has shown that calibrating the weights will lead to problems especially in the self-calibration steps.
| |
| | |
| Finally, we apply the calibration to the target fields in the mosaic, linearly interpolating the gain solutions from the secondary calibrator, J1822-0938. In this case however, we want to apply the amplitude and phase gains derived from the secondary calibrator, J1822-0938, since that is close to the target source on the sky, and we assume that the gains applicable to the target source are very similar to those derived in the direction of the secondary calibrator. Of course, this is not strictly true, since the gains on J1822-0938 were derived at a different time and in a different position on the sky from the target. However, assuming that the calibrator was sufficiently close to the target, and the weather was sufficiently well-behaved, then this is a reasonable approximation, and should get us a sufficiently good calibration that we can later use self-calibration to correct for the small inaccuracies thus introduced.
| |
| | |
| The procedure for applying the calibration to the target source is very similar to what we just did for the calibrator sources.
| |
| <source lang="python">
| |
| # In CASA
| |
| applycal(vis='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.ms',
| |
| field='2~8',
| |
| gaintable=['3c391_ctm_mosiac_10s_spw0.antpos', '3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.fluxscale1', '3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.B0', '3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.D1', '3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.X1'],
| |
| gainfield=['','J1822-0938','','',''],
| |
| interp=['linear'],
| |
| parang=True,calwt=F)
| |
| </source>
| |
| | |
| [[Image:3C391_applycal.png|200px|thumb|right|applycal inputs]]
| |
| * field : We can calibrate all seven target fields at once by setting ''field='2~8' ''.
| |
| * gainfield : In this case, we wish to use the gains derived on the secondary calibrator, for the reasons explained in the previous paragraph.
| |
| * interp : This time, we linearly interpolate between adjacent calibrator scans, to compute the appropriate gains for the intervening observations of the target.
| |
| | |
| [[Image:3c391 ctm plotms AP corrected.jpg|thumb|{{plotms}} GUI showing amplitude plotted against phase for the calibrated data on the secondary calibrator J1822-0938]]
| |
| We should now have fully-calibrated visibilities in the CORRECTED_DATA column of the measurement set, and it is worthwhile pausing to inspect them, to ensure that the calibration did what we expected it to. A nice way of doing this is to use {{plotms}} to plot the amplitude and phase of the CORRECTED_DATA column against one another, for one of the parallel-hand correlations (RR or LL; the signal in the cross-hands, RL and LR is much smaller, and will be noiselike for an unpolarized calibrator). This should then show a nice ball of visibilities centered at zero phase (with some scatter) and the amplitude found for that source in {{fluxscale}}. An example is shown at right.
| |
| | |
| Inspecting the data at this stage may well show up previously-unnoticed bad data. Plotting up the '''corrected''' amplitude against UV distance, or against time is a good way to find such issues. If you find bad data, you can remove them via interactive flagging in {{plotms}}, or via manual flagging in {{flagdata}} once you have identified the offending antennas/baselines/channels/times. When you are happy that all data (particularly on your target source) look good, you may proceed.
| |
| | |
| Now that the calibration has been applied to the target data, we can split off the science targets, creating a new, calibrated measurement set containing all the target fields.
| |
| | |
| <source lang="python">
| |
| # In CASA
| |
| split(vis='3c391_ctm_mosaic_10s_spw0.ms',outputvis='3c391_ctm_mosaic_spw0.ms',
| |
| datacolumn='corrected',field='2~8')
| |
| </source>
| |
| | |
| * outputvis : We give the name of the new measurement set to be written, which will contain the calibrated data on the science targets.
| |
| * datacolumn : We use the CORRECTED_DATA column, containing the calibrated data which we just wrote using {{applycal}}.
| |
| * field : We wish to put all the mosaic pointings into a single measurement set, for imaging and joint deconvolution.
| |
| | |
| == Imaging ==
| |
| | |
| Now that we have split off the target data into a separate measurement set with all the calibration applied, it's time to make an image. Recall from the lectures that the visibility data and the sky brightness distribution (a.k.a. image) are Fourier transform pairs
| |
| | |
| <math>
| |
| I(l,m) = \int V(u,v) e^{[2\pi i(ul + vm)]} dudv
| |
| </math>
| |
| | |
| The <math>u</math> and <math>v</math> coordinates are the baselines, measured in units of the observing wavelength while the <math>l</math> and <math>m</math> coordinates are the direction cosines on the sky. For generality, the sky coordinates are written in terms of direction cosines, but for most EVLA (and ALMA) observations they can be related simply to the right ascension (<math>l</math>) and declination (<math>m</math>). Also recall from the lectures that this equation is valid only if the <math>w</math> coordinate of the baselines can be neglected. This assumption is almost always true at high frequencies and smaller EVLA configurations (such as the 4.6 GHz, D-configuration observations here); the <math>w</math> coordinate cannot be neglected at lower frequencies and larger configurations (e.g., 0.33 GHz, A-configuration observations). This expression also neglects other factors, such as the shape of the primary beam. For more information on imaging, see [[http://casa.nrao.edu/docs/userman/UserManch5.html#x236-2330005 Synthesis Imaging]] within the CASA Reference Manual.
| |
| | |
| [[Image:3c391_clean_param.png|200px|thumb|left|clean parameters]]
| |
| | |
| CASA has a single task, {{clean}} which both Fourier transforms the data and deconvolves the resulting image.
| |
| Assuming you did the polarization calibration earlier, a command line call to image and deconvolve the dataset would be:
| |
| <source lang="python">
| |
| # In CASA
| |
| clean(vis='3c391_ctm_mosaic_spw0.ms',imagename='3c391_ctm_spw0_IQUV',
| |
| field='',spw='',
| |
| mode='mfs',
| |
| niter=5000,
| |
| gain=0.1, threshold='1.0mJy',
| |
| psfmode='clarkstokes',
| |
| imagermode='mosaic', ftmachine='mosaic',
| |
| multiscale=[0, 6, 18, 54], smallscalebias=0.9,
| |
| interactive=True,
| |
| imsize=[576,576], cell=['2.5arcsec','2.5arcsec'],
| |
| stokes='IQUV',
| |
| weighting='briggs',robust=0.0,
| |
| calready=True)
| |
| </source>
| |
| If you previously skipped the polarization calibration, you should instead set ''stokes='I' '' and ''psfmode='clark' ''.
| |
| | |
| {{clean}} is a powerful task, with many inputs, and a certain amount of experimentation may be (likely is) required.
| |
| * mode='mfs' : Use multi-frequency synthesis imaging. The fractional bandwidth of these data is non-zero (128 MHz at a central frequency of 4.6 GHz). Recall that the <math>u</math> and <math>v</math> coordinates are defined as the baseline coordinates, measured in wavelengths. Thus, slight changes in the frequency from channel to channel result in slight changes in <math>u</math> and <math>v</math>. There is a concomitant improvement in <math>u</math>-<math>v</math> coverage if the visibility data from the multiple spectral channels are gridded separately onto the <math>u</math>-<math>v</math> plane, as opposed to treating all spectral channels as having the same frequency.
| |
| * niter=5000,gain=0.1,threshold='1.0mJy' : Recall that the CLEAN gain is the amount by which a CLEAN component is subtracted during the CLEANing process. niter and threshold are (coupled) means of determining when to stop the CLEANing process, with niter specifying to find and subtract that many CLEAN components while threshold specifies a minimum flux density threshold a CLEAN component can have before CLEAN stops. See also interactive below. Imaging is an iterative process, and to set the threshold and number of iterations, it is usually wise to CLEAN interactively in the first instance, stopping when spurious emission from sidelobes (arising from gain errors) dominates the residual emission in the field. Here, we have used our experience in interactive mode to set a threshold level based on the rms noise in the resulting image. The number of iterations should then be set high enough to reach this threshold.
| |
| * interactive=T : Very often, particularly when one is exploring how a source appears for the first time, it can be valuable to interact with the CLEANing process. If True, interactive causes a {{viewer}} window to appear. One can then set CLEAN regions, restricting where CLEAN searches for CLEAN components, as well as monitor the CLEANing process. A standard procedure is to set a large value for niter, and stop the CLEANing when it visually appears to be approaching the noise level. This procedure also allows one to change the CLEANing region, in cases when low-level intensity becomes visible as the CLEANing process proceeds. For more details, see [[http://casa.nrao.edu/docs/userman/UserMansu254.html#x292-2870005.3.14 Interactive Cleaning]], and also the discussion below.
| |
| * imsize=[576], cell=['2.5arcsec'] : See the discussion below regarding the setting of the image size and cell size.
| |
| * stokes='IQUV' and psfmode='clarkstokes' : Separate images will be made in all four polarizations (total intensity I, linear polarizations Q and U, and circular polarization V), and, with psfmode='clarkstokes', the Clark CLEAN algorithm will deconvolve each Stokes plane separately thereby making the polarization image more independent of the total intensity.
| |
| * weighting='briggs',robust=0.0 : 3C 391 has diffuse, extended emission that is (at least partially) resolved out by the interferometer owing to a lack of short spacings. A naturally-weighted image would show large-scale patchiness in the noise. In order to suppress this effect, Briggs weighting is used (intermediate between natural and uniform weighting), with a default robust factor of 0.
| |
| * imagermode='mosaic', ftmachine='mosaic' : The data consist of a 7-pointing mosaic, since the supernova remnant fills almost the full primary beam at 4.6 GHz. A mosaic combines the data from all of the fields, with imaging and deconvolution being done jointly on all 7 fields. A mosaic both helps compensate for the shape of the primary beam and reduces the amount of large (angular) scale structure that is resolved out by the interferometer.
| |
| * multiscale=[0, 6, 18, 54], smallscalebias=0.9 : A multi-scale CLEANing algorithm is used because the supernova remnant contains both diffuse, extended structure on large spatial scales and finer filamentary structure on smaller scales. The settings for multiscale are in units of pixels, with 0 pixels equivalent to the traditional delta-function CLEAN. The scales here are chosen to provide delta functions and then three logarithmically scaled sizes to fit to the data. The first scale (6 pixels) is chosen to be comparable to the size of the beam. The smallscalebias attempts to balance the weight given to larger scales, which often have more flux density, and the smaller scales, which often are brighter. Considerable experimentation is likely to be necessary; one of the authors of this document found that it was useful to CLEAN several rounds with this setting, change multiscale to be multiscale=[] and remove much of the smaller scale structure, then return to this setting.
| |
| | |
| Setting the appropriate pixel depends upon basic optics aspects of interferometry. Using [[plotms]] to look at the newly-calibrated, target-only data set,
| |
| <source lang="python">
| |
| # In CASA
| |
| plotms(vis='3c391_ctm_mosaic_spw0.ms',xaxis='uvdist_l',yaxis='amp')
| |
| </source>
| |
| [[Image:3c391 ctm spw0 uvplt.jpg|thumb|{{plotms}} GUI showing Amplitude vs UV Distance in wavelengths for 3C 391 at 4600 MHz]]
| |
| one should obtain a plot similar to the one shown at the right with the (calibrated) visibility amplitude as a function of <math>u</math>-<math>v</math> distance.
| |
| The maximum baseline is about 16,000 wavelengths, i.e., an angular scale of 12 arcseconds (<math>\lambda/D=1/16000</math>). The most effective CLEANing occurs with 3--5 pixels across the synthesized beam. Above, a cell size of 2.5 arcseconds (just under 5 pixels per beam) is specified. If only one value for the cell size is specified (as done here), the same value is used in both directions.
| |
| | |
| The supernova remnant itself is known to have a diameter of order 9 arcminutes, corresponding to about 216 pixels for the chosen cell size. The mosaic was set up with 7 fields, 1 centered on the remnant and 6 flanking fields; the spacing of the fields was chosen based on the size of the (antenna) primary beam. In order to prevent image artifacts arising from aliasing due to the mosaicing, the image should be sized such that the supernova remnant is restricted to the inner quarter of the image. CASA also has the feature that its Fourier transform engine does <em>not</em> require a strict power of 2 for the number of pixels in the image (i.e., <math>2^n \times 2^n</math> pixel image).
| |
| <!-- The Fourier transform is most efficient if the number of pixels on a side is a composite number divisible by 2 and 3 and/or 5. We choose 576, which is <math>2^6\times3^2</math>, and is close to <math>2\times216</math>. We therefore set ''imsize=[576,576]''.
| |
| -->
| |
| | |
| [[Image:3C391 interactive clean.png|thumb|Example of interactive cleaning]]
| |
| As mentioned above, we can guide the clean process by allowing it to find clean components only within a user-specified region. The easiest way to do this is via interactive clean. When {{clean}} runs in interactive mode, a viewer window will pop up as shown right. To get a more detailed view of the central regions containing the emission, zoom in by tracing out a rectangle with your left mouse button and double-clicking inside the zoom box you just made. Play with the color scale to bring out the emission better, by holding down the middle mouse button and moving it around. To create a clean box (a region within which components may be found), you can either hold down the right mouse button and trace out a rectangle around the source, then double click inside that rectangle to set it as a box. Alternatively, you can trace out a more generic shape to better enclose the irregular outline of the supernova remnant. To do that, right-click on the icon highlighted in green in the figure shown at right. Then trace out a shape by right-clicking where you want the corners of that shape. Once you have come full circle, the shape will be traced out in green, with small squares at the corners. Double-click inside this region and the green outline will turn white. You have now set your clean region. To toggle back to the rectangle tracer again, right-click on the icon circled in green in the figure at right. If you have made a mistake with your clean box, click on the "Erase" button, trace out a rectangle around your erroneous region, and double click inside that rectangle. You can also set multiple clean regions. By default, all clean regions will apply only to the plane shown. To change this to select all planes, click the "All Channels" button at the top.
| |
| | |
| When you are happy with your clean regions, press the green circular arrow button on the far right to continue deconvolution. After completing a cycle, a revised image will come up. As the brightest points are removed from the image ("cleaned" off), fainter emission may show up. You can adjust the clean boxes each cycle, to enclose all real emission. After many cycles, once only noise is left, you can hit the red and white cross icon to stop cleaning.
| |
| | |
| | |
| [[Image:3c391_ctm_i_image.jpg|thumb|{{viewer}} display of the Stokes I mosaic of 3C 391 at 4600 MHz]]
| |
| {{clean}} will make several output files, all named with the prefix given as ''imagename''. These include:
| |
| * .image - the final restored image, with the clean components convolved with a restoring beam and added to the remaining residuals at the end of the imaging process
| |
| * .flux - the effective response of the telescope (the primary beam)
| |
| * .flux.pbcoverage - the effective response of the full mosaic image
| |
| * .mask - the areas where you have permitted imager to find clean components
| |
| * .model - the sum of all the clean components, which has been stored as the model_data column in the measurement set
| |
| * .psf - the dirty beam, which is being deconvolved from the true sky brightness during the clean process
| |
| * .residual - what is left at the end of the deconvolution process; this is useful to diagnose whether or not to clean more deeply
| |
| | |
| After the imaging and deconvolution process has finished, you can use the {{viewer}} to look at your image.
| |
| | |
| <source lang="python">
| |
| # In CASA
| |
| viewer('3c391_ctm_spw0_IQUV.image')
| |
| </source>
| |
| | |
| This will bring up a viewer window containing the image, which should look similar to that shown at right. The tape deck buttons that you see under the image can be used to step through the different Stokes parameters (I,Q,U,V). You can adjust the color scale and zoom in to a selected region by assigning mouse buttons to the icons immediately above the image (hover over the icons to get a description of what they do).
| |
| | |
| Note that the image is cut off in a circular fashion at the edges, corresponding to the default minimum primary beam response within {{clean}} of 0.2.
| |
| | |
| The example above illustrates multi-scale CLEAN. Not all sources or fields will require multi-scale CLEAN; for reference, here is the same data set, but without multi-scale CLEANing.
| |
| | |
| <source lang="python">
| |
| # In CASA
| |
| clean(vis='3c391_ctm_mosaic_spw0.ms',imagename='3c391_ctm_spw0_no_multiscale_IQUV',
| |
| field='',spw='',
| |
| mode='mfs',
| |
| niter=5000,
| |
| gain=0.1, threshold='1.0mJy',
| |
| psfmode='clarkstokes',
| |
| imagermode='mosaic', ftmachine='mosaic',
| |
| interactive=True,
| |
| imsize=[576,576], cell=['2.5arcsec','2.5arcsec'],
| |
| stokes='IQUV',
| |
| weighting='briggs',robust=0.0,
| |
| calready=True)
| |
| </source>
| |
| | |
| == Next Steps ==
| |
| | |
| There are a variety of additional analyses that could be done, including extracting the statistics of the images just produced, continuing with the polarization imaging, and self-calibration of the data. Examples of these topics are included in
| |
| [[EVLA Advanced Topics 3C391]].
| |
| | |
| If one is reading this as part of the Day 1 Summer School Tutorial, and there is time, one could consider beginning one of these advanced topics.
| |
