View source for VLA CASA Pipeline-CASA5.1.2


'''This guide is designed for CASA 5.1.2'''


== Introduction ==

When VLA observations are complete, the raw data need to be calibrated for scientific applications. This is achieved through various steps, as explained in the [https://casaguides.nrao.edu/index.php/Karl_G._Jansky_VLA_Tutorials VLA CASA tutorials.] The different calibration procedures are also bundled in a general VLA calibration pipeline that is described on the [http://go.nrao.edu/vla-pipe VLA pipeline webpage.] At NRAO, the pipeline is executed on every science scheduling block (SB) that the VLA observes successfully. At this time, scientific target imaging is not part of the VLA pipeline. Manual imaging steps, however, are explained in the [https://casaguides.nrao.edu/index.php/Karl_G._Jansky_VLA_Tutorials VLA CASA tutorials]. 

The  [http://go.nrao.edu/vla-pipe VLA pipeline webpage]  describes how to run, modify, and re-execute the VLA pipeline. There are also instructions on how to restore archived pipeline products as well as a list of known issues.  In the following material, we provide an example of a VLA pipeline weblog, explain the different pipeline stages, describe some of the diagnostic information and plots, and point out potential issues with the data or the pipeline results.

== The Pipeline Weblog ==

The pipeline run can be inspected through a weblog that is launched by pointing a web browser to ''file:///<path to your working directory>/pipelineTIME/html/index.html'' . Note that we regularly test the weblog on Firefox but less so on other browsers. So if you don't use Firefox, there's a chance that not all items are displayed correctly. 

The following discussion is based on a weblog that can be viewed through the following link: 


 [https://casa.nrao.edu/Data/EVLA/Pipeline/CASA5.1.2/html/ Pipeline Weblog]


Alternatively, the weblog can be downloaded from [https://casa.nrao.edu/Data/EVLA/Pipeline/VLApipe-guide-weblog-CASA5.1.2.tar.gz https://casa.nrao.edu/Data/EVLA/Pipeline/VLApipe-guide-weblog-CASA5.1.2.tar.gz] (188 MB) 

and extracted via:

<source lang="bash">
# In a Terminal
tar xzvf VLApipe-guide-weblog-CASA5.1.2.tar.gz
</source>

then point your browser to '''html/index.html''' (as of CASA 5.1.2 Firefox seems to work best. Chrome may not show all items properly unless started like ''Chrome --args --allow-file-access-from-files /path/to/weblog//html/index.html'').

At the top of the landing page one can find the items '''Home''' (the index.html landing page), '''By Topic''' and '''By Task''' that  provide navigation through the pipeline results. 

=== Home Screen ===

The [https://casa.nrao.edu/Data/EVLA/Pipeline/CASA5.1.2/html/ Home page] of the weblog (Fig. 1) contains essential information such as the project archive code, the PI name, and the start and end time of the observations. The CASA and pipeline versions that were used for the pipeline run are also listed on this page, as well as a table with the MS name, receiver bands, number of antennas, on source time, min/max baseline lengths, the atmospheric phase monitor rms, and the file size.

[[Image:VLApipe-home-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|center|Fig. 1: The main page of the weblog]]

=== Overview Screen ===

An [https://casa.nrao.edu/Data/EVLA/Pipeline/CASA5.1.2/html/t2-1.html?sidebar=sidebar_13A_398_sb17165245_eb19476558_56374_213876608796_ms&subpage=t2-1_details.html Overview] of the observations (Fig. 2) can be obtained by clicking on the MS name.

[[Image:VLApipe-overview-CASA5.1.2.png |400px|thumb|center|Fig. 2: The weblog overview page.]]
 

This page provides additional information about the observation. It includes ''Spatial Setup'' (science target and calibrator field names), ''Antenna Setup'' (min/max baseline lengths, number of antennas and baselines), ''Spectral Setup'' (band designations, including VLA baseband information; science bands include most calibrators, but exclude pointing and setup scans), and ''Sky Setup'' (min/max elevation). The page also provides graphical overviews of the scan intent and field ID observing sequence. A plot with weather information is also provided. Clicking the blue headers provides additional information on each topic. 


The '''Spatial Setup''' page (Fig. 3) lists all sources and fields (where a source is a field with a given spectral setup). Names, IDs, positions, and scan intents are listed for each source/field. 
{|
|[[Image:VLApipe-spatial-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 3: ''Spatial Setup page.]]
|}



The '''Antenna Setup''' (Fig. 4) page lists the locations of all antennas (antenna pad name and offset from array center) and contains two graphical location plots for the array configuration (one linear and one logarithmically scaled for better separation of close antenna labels). On a second tab, baseline lengths are  listed and the 'percentile' column provides a rough indication of how many baselines are shorter than that in each row. 

{|
|[[Image:VLApipe-antenna-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 4a: ''Antenna Setup'' page (Antennas). ]]
|[[Image:VLApipe-baselines-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|center|Fig. 4b: ''Antenna Setup'' page (Baselines). ]]
|} 


The '''Spectral Setup''' page (Fig. 5) contains all spectral window descriptions, including start, center and end frequencies, the bandwidth of each spectral window (spw), as well as the number of spectral channels and their widths in frequency and velocity units. For each spw, the polarization products and the receiver bands are also listed. 
Note that ''Science Windows'' contain all spws that are used for calibration. Setup and pointing scans are not part of science windows but they are available under ''All Windows'' together with their intents. (Note though that in our case, however, pointing scans are mistakenly identified as science scans, this is due to its peculiar data structure, which labeled a setup scan as a target scan). 

{|
|[[Image:VLApipe-spectral-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 5: ''Spectral Setup'' page.]]
|}


Clicking the '''Sky Setup''' page (Fig. 6) leads to elevation versus Azimuth and Elevation versus Time plots for the entire observation. The plots are colorized by field id.

{|
|[[Image:VLApipe-sky-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 6: ''Sky Setup'' page.]]
|}


'''Scans''' (Fig. 7) provides a listing of all scans, including start and stop time stamps, durations, field names and intents, and the tuning (spw) setup for each. Again ''Science Scans'' and ''All Scans'' can be inspected in separate tabs. 
{|
|[[Image:VLApipe-scans-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 7: ''Scans'' page.]]
|}

Most of the above information can also be accessed by the 'LISTOBS OUTPUT' button. The link leads to the output of the {{listobs}} task, which lists the details of the observations (Fig. 8), including the scan characteristics, with observing times, scan ids, field ids and names, associated spectral windows, integration times, and scan intents. Further down, the spectral window characteristics are provided through their ids, channel numbers, channel widths, start and central frequencies. Sources and antenna locations are part of the {{listobs}} output, too. 

[[Image:VLApipe-listobs-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|center|Fig. 8: The {{listobs}} output.]]

=== By Topic Screen ===

The top-level [https://casa.nrao.edu/Data/EVLA/Pipeline/CASA5.1.2/html/t1-3.html By Topic] link leads to a page that provides basic pipeline summaries such as warnings, scores, and flagging summaries as functions of field, antenna, and spectral window (spw) (Fig. 9). 


[[Image:VLApipe-topic-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|center|Fig. 9: The '''By Topic''' page of the weblog.]]

== By Task Screen: Overview of the Pipeline Heuristic Stages ==

The pipeline is divided into 20 individual pipeline heuristic stages with heuristic ('hifv') tasks listed under the [https://casa.nrao.edu/Data/EVLA/Pipeline/CASA5.1.2/html/t1-4.html By Task] tab (Fig. 10). Each stage has an associated score for success, but note that '''the scores are not yet implemented as of the CASA 5.1.2 VLA pipeline'''. If there are warnings and errors in tasks, they would be indicated by 'exclamation mark' and 'cross' icons near the task names. In our example, the pipeline execution went through without problems. 

[[Image:VLApipe-tasks-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|center|Fig. 10: The '''By Task''' pipeline execution stages.]]

To obtain more details on each stage, click on the individual task names. Task sub-pages contain task results such as plots or derived numbers. Common to all pages is information on the '''Pipeline QA''' ('Quality Assurance', not implemented in the CASA VLA pipeline as packaged in 5.1.2), the heuristic task '''Input Parameters''', '''Task Execution Statistics''' (benchmarks), and the '''CASA logs'''. Those sections provide information on the triggered heuristics, as well as the actual CASA task execution commands and their return logger messages. 


=== The Individual Stages ===

 
==== '''[https://casa.nrao.edu/Data/EVLA/Pipeline/CASA5.1.2/html/t2-4m.html?sidebar=sidebar_stage1&ms=all&subpage=t2-4m_details.html  Stage 1. hifv_importdata]: Register VLA measurement sets with the pipeline''' ====
 
In the first stage, the raw SDM-BDF is imported into the VLA pipeline. An MS is created and basic information on the MS is provided, such as SchedBlock ID, the number of scans and fields, and the size of the MS. The MS is also checked for suitable scan intents and a summary of the initial flags is calculated (check the "CASA logs" attached to the bottom of the page).  "Flux densities" is used for ALMA and is not relevant to VLA data at this time. 
{|
|[[Image:VLApipe-importdata-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 11: The Stage 1 ''hifv_importdata'' task page.]]
|} 

<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap;">
CHECK for: any errors in the import stage. Warnings will also be issued for missing, necessary scan intents or if the data had previously been processed. This is usually encountered when the pipeline is run on an MS rather than an SDM.  
</pre>

==== '''[https://casa.nrao.edu/Data/EVLA/Pipeline/CASA5.1.2/html/t2-4m.html?sidebar=sidebar_stage2&ms=all&subpage=t2-4m_details.html Stage 2. hifv_hanning]: VLA Hanning Smoothing''' ====

This stage Hanning-smooths the MS. This procedure reduces the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibbs_phenomenon Gibbs phenomenon] (ringing) when extremely bright and narrow spectral features are present and spill over into adjacent spectral channels. Gibbs ringing is typically caused by strong RFI or a strong maser line. As part of the process, Hanning smoothing will reduce the spectral resolution by a factor of 2 while maintaining the same number of channels. (Note: this means that data in adjacent channels will no longer be independent.)

<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap;">
CHECK for: nothing except for completion of the task. FOR SPECTRAL LINE DATA: you may decide not to run this stage since spectral lines will be smoothed to a degraded spectral resolution.
</pre>

==== '''[https://casa.nrao.edu/Data/EVLA/Pipeline/CASA5.1.2/html/t2-4m.html?sidebar=sidebar_stage3&ms=all&subpage=t2-4m_details.html Stage 3. hifv_flagdata]: VLA Deterministic flagging'''	====

This stage applies flags that were generated by the VLA online system during the observations. The flags include antennas not on source (ANOS), shadowed antennas, scans with intents that are of no use for the pipeline (such as pointing and setup scans), autocorrelations, the first and last 5% edge channels of each spectral window (spw; with a minimum of 3), clipping absolute zero values that the correlator occasionally produces, quacking (i.e. flagging start or end integrations of scans; the pipeline will flag the first integration after a field change), and flagging 
the end 10 channels of the top and bottom spw of each baseband. The flags are reported as a fraction of the total data for the full dataset as well as broken up into the individual calibrator scans and target data. A plot is provided that displays the online antenna flags as a function of time. 

A flagging template can also be provided to the pipeline which applies known flags to the data (see [http://go.nrao.edu/vla-pipe The VLA Pipeline Webpage]). 
 
In our example (Fig. 12), the target sources start with 3.12% flagged data; the deterministic flagging stage adds 6.05% for antenna not on source; 0.82% of other online flags (e.g., subreflector rotations or translations); edge channels amount to 6.4%; clipping of absolute zero values to 0.11%; quack removes bad first integrations (0.19%) in scans; and 1.4% of flags are due to baseband clipping. This combines to a total of 8.71% of flagged data for the scientific targets. Other sources are also listed and the entire MS is flagged on a 8.84% level. No flagging template was applied.
{|
|[[Image:VLApipe-flagdata-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 12: The Stage 3 ''hifv_flagdata'' task page.]]
|}

<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap;">
CHECK for: the percentage of the flags. If a very large portion (or even all) of the visibilities of the calibrators are flagged, try to find out the reason. Also have a quick look at the graph of the online flags to understand whether the system behaved normally or if there was an unusually high failure of some kind.
</pre>

==== '''[https://casa.nrao.edu/Data/EVLA/Pipeline/CASA5.1.2/html/t2-4m.html?sidebar=sidebar_stage4&ms=all&subpage=t2-4m_details.html Stage 4. hifv_setjy]: Set calibrator model visibilities''' ==== 	

Stage number 4 calculates and sets the calibrator spectral and spatial model for the standard VLA flux density calibrators (3C48, 3C138, 3C147, or 3C286 with a CALIBRATE_FLUX scan intent). The task page lists the calculated flux densities for each spectral window (spw). It also contains plots of the amplitude versus uv-distance for the models per spw that are calculated and used to specify the flux density calibrator characteristics. If the scan intent CALIBRATE_FLUX is absent or the calibrator not a standard VLA flux density calibrator, the absolute flux density scale calibration will be on an arbitrary level.
{|
|[[Image:VLApipe-setjy-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|right|Fig. 13: The Stage 4 ''hifv_setjy'' task page.]]
|}

<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap;">
CHECK for: any unexpected flux densities or model shapes.
</pre>

==== '''[https://casa.nrao.edu/Data/EVLA/Pipeline/CASA5.1.2/html/t2-4m.html?sidebar=sidebar_stage5&ms=all&subpage=t2-4m_details.html Stage 5. hifv_priorcals]: Priorcals (gaincurves, opacities, antenna positions corrections and rq gains)''' ====	

Next, the prior calibration tables are being derived. They include gain-elevation dependencies, atmospheric opacity corrections, antenna offset corrections, and requantizer (rq) gains. They are independent of the calibrator observations themselves and can be derived from ancillary data such as antenna offset tables, weather data, antenna elevation, and switched power measurements. 

In addition to the opacities themselves (calculated per spw; Fig. 14), a plot is attached that provides more information on the weather conditions during the observation. 
{|
|[[Image:VLApipe-precal1-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 14a: The Stage 5 ''hifv_priorcals'' task page.]]
|[[Image:VLApipe-precal2-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|right|Fig. 14b: The Stage 5 ''hifv_priorcals'' task page, continued.]]
|}

The antenna positions are usually updated within a few days after an antenna was moved, and for our case corrections (on the order of a few millimeters) for four antennas are applied. 

<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap;">
CHECK for: extreme or unrealistic opacities. Also check that the antenna offsets are within are reasonable range (reasonable values are usually less than +/- 0.0200 meters). There should only be updates for a few antennas.
</pre>

==== '''[https://casa.nrao.edu/Data/EVLA/Pipeline/CASA5.1.2/html/t2-4m.html?sidebar=sidebar_stage6&ms=all&subpage=t2-4m_details.html Stage 6. hifv_testBPdcals]: Initial test calibrations''' ====

Now it is time to determine the delays and the bandpass solutions (gain and phase) for the first time. Applying the initial solution will make it easier to identify RFI that needs to be flagged. There will be a couple of similar iterations for the calibration tables in the following pipeline stages to eventually obtain the final set of calibration tables. 


The plot on the main page (Fig. 15) shows the bandpass calibrator with the initial bandpass solutions applied. There are links to other plots showing delay, gain amplitude, gain phase, bandpass amplitude, and bandpass phase solutions for each antenna. Note that the pipeline will typically switch reference antennas so phase solutions of reference antennas may not be perfectly zero show some steps (an example will be shown later). When delays are more than +/-10ns it will be worth examining the data more closely. Some additional flagging may be needed. 
{| 
|[[Image:VLApipe-testbpdcal-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 15: The Stage 6 ''hifv_testBPdcals'' task page.]]
|}	

The gain amplitude and phase solutions are derived per integration and they are used to correct for decorrelation before any spectral bandpass solutions are calculated. The latter are determined over a full solution interval, usually for all bandpass scans together. Bandpasses should be smooth although they can vary substantially over wide frequency bands. The bandpass (BP) phase solutions are derived after systematic slopes were accounted for by the delay solutions. 


Example delays are shown in Fig. 16: The delays for ea16 vary but are within a narrow range of only a few ns. These are good solutions. The delays for ea21 are fine except for the 33-35GHz frequency range where many solutions failed or scatter substantially. The respective frequency range/spectral window (spw) should be flagged manually (best through a flagging template) if the following pipeline steps will not take care of it. For ea22 the delays in the 35-37GHz range are excessive with a value of about -70ns. It is likely that the pipeline will be able to calibrate these values correctly but one may need to flag the respective spws if not.
{| 
|[[Image:VLApipe-step6-delay-ea16-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 16a: Delays for ea16.]]
|[[Image:VLApipe-step6-delay-ea21-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|center|Fig. 16b: Delays for ea21.]]
|}
{|
|[[Image:VLApipe-step6-delay-ea22-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 16c: Delays for ea22.]]
|}	


In Fig. 17, we show some of gain amplitude plot examples. Antenna ea03 shows credible solutions (the colors represent different spectral windows and polarizations; an amplitude spread as a function of frequency is expected given the spectral index of the source), whereas ea04 has elevated values until 8:06. Those should be flagged (but the pipeline may be able to detect and flag them in one of the subsequent stages). Some of the baselines in ea18 show low values in the 2-3Jy range, but they are constant in time. At this stage one can assume that they reflect the correct calibration values. It might still be worth making a note and check if calibration downstream was applied correctly. The situation is different for ea25 which shows an extreme decrease of amplitude as a function of time. This is likely an antenna mechanical error. This antenna should be inspected carefully, there could be a problem which will make it unusable. Although the bandpass solutions seem to be ok, the bandpass and flux density calibrators coincide and it is likely that the absolute flux density calibration is very unreliable for this antenna.  
{| 
|[[Image:VLApipe-step6-gainamp-ea03-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 17a: Gain Amplitude for ea03. ]]
|[[Image:VLApipe-step6-gainamp-ea04-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|center|Fig. 17b: Gain Amplitude for ea04.]]
|}
{|
|[[Image:VLApipe-step6-gainamp-ea18-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 17c: Gain Amplitude for ea18.]]
|[[Image:VLApipe-step6-gainamp-ea25-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|center|Fig. 17d: Gain Amplitude for ea25.]]
|}	


Since the gain amp/phase steps per integration are only performed to reduce decorrelation, the phase plots are the most important in this context. In Fig. 18 we show a few solutions. All phases for the reference antenna ea09 are by definition zero. The phase variations as a function of time increase for higher frequencies and longer baselines. Therefore both, ea03 and ea21 have good solutions given that ea03 is closer to ea09 than ea21 (cf. the ''Antenna Setup'' on the ''Overview'' page). There are no jumps in the phases - remember that -180 and +180 are identical phase values and lines connecting those values are only a plotting issue, not the actual phase behavior. 
{| 
|[[Image:VLApipe-step6-gainphase-ea09-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 18a: Gain Phase for ea09.]]
|[[Image:VLApipe-step6-gainphase-ea03-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|center|Fig. 18b: Gain Phase for ea03.]]
|}
{|
|[[Image:VLApipe-step6-gainphase-ea21-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 18c: Gain Phase for ea21.]]
|}	


Now let's have a look at the bandpasses themselves (Fig. 19). Antenna ea17 shows very good bandpass solutions. Since the spectral windows (spws) are small compared to the entire frequency range, the edges of each spw dominate the variations. The 37-39GHz range of ea18 varies considerably more. In fact this antenna, polarization and baseband shows a deformatter timing error (more in the following stage 7) which needs to be flagged. Some flagging was already performed for the 33-35GHz range of ea21. This range corresponds to the failed and noisy delays that we saw earlier in Fig. 16b. Antenna ea24 shows a few high values. They usually are fine as they also correspond to the edges of the spws. In particular if an spw edge coincides with a baseband edge, such spikes are usually more pronounced. Keep an eye on those although they are likely not a problem for the calibration. Finally, we show the bandpass of ea25, the antenna with the likely mechanical error. Although the Gain Amplitude showed decreasing values as a function of time (Fig. 17d), the bandpass itself does not look suspicious and can likely be used, based on this plot. The mechanical error, however, may also be present for other scans and since we identified it first for a flux density calibrator scan, that antenna should be flagged.
{| 
|[[Image:VLApipe-step6-BPgain-ea17-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 19a: BP Gain for ea17.]]
|[[Image:VLApipe-step6-BPgain-ea18-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|center|Fig. 19b: BP Gain for ea18.]]
|}
{|
|[[Image:VLApipe-step6-BPgain-ea21-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 19c: BP Gain for ea21.]]
|[[Image:VLApipe-step6-BPgain-ea24-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|center|Fig. 19d: BP Gain for ea24.]]
|}
{|
|[[Image:VLApipe-step6-BPgain-ea25-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 19e: BP Gain for ea25.]]
|}	

The bandpass (BP) phases (Fig. 20) as a function of frequency/channel. Again the reference antenna ea09 only shows zero phases by definition. Antenna ea11 is an example of proper phase solutions across the bandpass. Note again that edges of the spectral windows are showing the largest deviations. Some variations are larger than others, but they are all in a similar range. We already saw the large scatter in the bandpass amplitude of ea18 at 37-39GHz due to a signal path (bad deformatter) problem and the pattern is apparent in the phases. Finally we show ea24 again and find that the edge spike in the amplitudes is also seen in the phases. At this level, the solution should be usable. 

{| 
|[[Image:VLApipe-step6-BPphase-ea09-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 20a: BP Phase for ea09. ]]
|[[Image:VLApipe-step6-BPphase-ea11-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|center|Fig. 20b: BP Phase for ea11.]]
|}
{|
|[[Image:VLApipe-step6-BPphase-ea18-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 20c: BP Phase for ea18.]]
|[[Image:VLApipe-step6-BPphase-ea24-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|center|Fig. 20d: BP Phase for ea24.]]
|}	

<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap;">
CHECK for: strong RFI and whether it was eliminated in later flagging stages or not (especially via a comparison with the output plots of task 14). Also check for jumps in phase and/or amplitude away from spectral window edges. If there are phase jumps for all but the reference antenna, maybe a different choice for the reference antenna should be considered. Also watch out for extreme delays of tens of ns and for very noisy data. 
</pre>

==== '''[https://casa.nrao.edu/Data/EVLA/Pipeline/CASA5.1.2/html/t2-4m.html?sidebar=sidebar_stage7&ms=all&subpage=t2-4m_details.html Stage 7. hifv_flagbaddef]: Flag bad deformatters''' ====

The digital transmission system (''DTS'') of each VLA antenna includes a formatting stage to convert the electronic to an optical signal before it is injected on the optical fiber link. On the correlator end the signal will be deformatted back to an electronic signal. Occasionally, the timing on the deformatter can be misaligned which results in very strong amplitude or phase slopes as a function of frequency. Sometimes the signal is similar to an abs(sin), or a 'bouncing' signal across a baseband for one polarization. The ''hifv_flagbaddef'' pipeline stage tries to identify such deformatter errors by checking for deviations more than 15% over the average bandpass. In that case the antenna, polarization, and spectral window (spw) are flagged. If more than 4 spws of a baseband are affected this way, the entire baseband will be flagged. 


For our data, no deformatter issues were automatically detected in the data for the amplitudes but the phases of a few spws are flagged (Fig. 21). We did see, however, that ea18 has a DTS problem in the 37-39GHz baseband (Figs. 19b/22a and 20c). Since this stage 7 did not detect and flag this range (which shows the limitations of the underlying code), manual flagging will be required for the affected antenna, polarization, and baseband for all sources. An example from a different dataset is provided in Fig. 22b. The 'V' shape close to 5.3 GHz with some values reaching close to zero are a sign for a deformatter problem. 

{| 
|[[Image:VLApipe-flagbaddef-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 21: The Stage 7 ''hifv_flagbaddef'' task page.]]
|}	

{| 
|[[Image:VLApipe-step6-BPgain-ea18-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 22a: Same as 19b, ea18 which shows a digital trasmission issue that ''hifv_flagbaddef'' was not able to identify.]]
|[[Image:VLApipe-baddefromatterexampleBP.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 22b: An example for a bad deformatter from a different dataset.]]
|}	

<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap;">
CHECK for: amplitude 'bounces', i.e. very strong variations of amplitude and/or phase well above the average of the other polarizations or basebands. The pattern can repeat a few times across a baseband but should be contained to a single baseband, antenna and polarization. Data for all sources in the spectral windows in a faulty baseband are affected. 
</pre>

==== '''[https://casa.nrao.edu/Data/EVLA/Pipeline/CASA5.1.2/html/t2-4m.html?sidebar=sidebar_stage8&ms=all&subpage=t2-4m_details.html Stage 8. hifv_checkflag]: Flag possible RFI on BP calibrator using rflag''' ====

Rflag as part of {{flagdata}} is a threshold-based automatic flagging algorithm in CASA. In this step, rflag is run on the bandpass calibrator to remove relatively bright RFI and to obtain improved bandpass calibrations tables later on. 

<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap;">
CHECK for: nothing in particular on this page, but some cumbersome RFI may have been eliminated in preparation for the following steps.
</pre>

==== '''[https://casa.nrao.edu/Data/EVLA/Pipeline/CASA5.1.2/html/t2-4m.html?sidebar=sidebar_stage9&ms=all&subpage=t2-4m_details.html Stage 9. hifv_semiFinalBPdcals]: Semi-final delay and bandpass calibrations''' ====

Now that some RFI was flagged, stage 6 is repeated here at stage 9, which results in better bandpass and delay solutions.
	
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap;">
CHECK for: strong RFI and whether it was eliminated in later flagging stages or not (especially via a comparison with the output plots of task 14). Also check for jumps in phase and/or amplitude away from spectral window edges. If there are phase jumps for all but the reference antenna, maybe a different choice for the reference antenna should be considered. Also watch out for extreme delays of tens of ns and for very noisy data. 
</pre>

==== '''[https://casa.nrao.edu/Data/EVLA/Pipeline/CASA5.1.2/html/t2-4m.html?sidebar=sidebar_stage10&ms=all&subpage=t2-4m_details.html Stage 10. hifv_checkflag]: Flag possible RFI on BP calibrator using rflag''' ==== 	

Once more, rflag is executed. After the bright RFI has been removed in step 8 and a new bandpass solution has been applied in step 9, a new flagging threshold will account for weaker RFI, which will be removed in this step 10. 

<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap;">
CHECK for: RFI that disappears in the following steps.
</pre>

==== '''[https://casa.nrao.edu/Data/EVLA/Pipeline/CASA5.1.2/html/t2-4m.html?sidebar=sidebar_stage11&ms=all&subpage=t2-4m_details.html Stage 11. hifv_semiFinalBPdcals]: Semi-final delay and bandpass calibrations''' ==== 	

Again, having removed more RFI, new delay and bandpass solutions are obtained here.

<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap;">
CHECK for: strong RFI and whether it was eliminated in later flagging stages or not (especially via a comparison with the output plots of stage 14). Also check for jumps in phase and/or amplitude away from spectral window edges. If there are phase jumps for all but the reference antenna, maybe a different choice for the reference antenna should be considered. Also watch out for extreme delays of tens of ns and for very noisy data. 
</pre>

==== '''[https://casa.nrao.edu/Data/EVLA/Pipeline/CASA5.1.2/html/t2-4m.html?sidebar=sidebar_stage12&ms=all&subpage=t2-4m_details.html Stage 12. hifv_solint]: Determine solint and Test gain calibrations''' ====	

For the final calibration, the pipeline determines the shortest and longest applicable solution interval (''solint''). Typically they refer to the (longest) visibility integration time and the length of the longest
gain calibration scan, respectively. 

In our case (Fig. 23) the longest time per integration is 3 seconds which therefore also corresponds the shortest solution interval. The longest solution interval is based on the longest phase calibrator scan, which lasts for ~85s. When subtracting the slew time and allowing for
'quack' flagging of the longest solution interval, the longest
solution interval results in ~76s.

{| 
|[[Image:VLApipe-solint-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 23: The Stage 12 ''hifv_solint'' task page.]]
|}	

Temporal gain and phase solutions are calculated for each antenna, spectral window, and polarization using these time intervals. In Fig. 24 we show some examples for the gains. Antenna ea03 shows consistent gain solutions with small variations over the time of the observations. Note that the last scan is the flux density calibrator and thus a different source with a different gain amplitude. Antenna ea04 shows increased values for the last few calibrator scans that may need to be flagged. This could be due to a bad pointing solution (scan 54 is a pointing, cf. the listobs output). Antenna ea25 has likely a pointing error that deteriorates over the first half of the observations. The {{listobs}} output tells us that a pointing update was obtained around 6:40UT at which point ea25 indeed recovered and shows good solutions.

{| 
|[[Image:VLApipe-solint-gain-ea03-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 24a: Gain versus Time for ea03.]]
|[[Image:VLApipe-solint-gain-ea04-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|center|Fig. 24b: Gain versus Time for ea04.]]
|}
{|
|[[Image:VLApipe-solint-gain-ea25-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 24c: Gain versus Time for ea25.]]
|}


Although the phase solution plots are very crowded (Fig. 25), we can see that ea03 has very steady values over time. The pipeline will apply phase corrections that are determined from this solution so that, later on, additional phase solutions will be close to zero. Antenna ea04 shows larger variations. Antenna ea09 is the initial phase reference antenna. The underlying {{gaincal}} command, however, was given a few possible reference antennas, ea09, ea14, ea13, ea03, in case a single reference is not usable for all times and spectral windows. Check the ''CASA log for stage 12'' at the bottom for the actual command. Indeed {{gaincal}} decided to chose different reference antennas for the solutions as the CASA log reports. To keep the phase interpolation consistent, ea09 phases have to absorb the offsets introduced by the alternate reference antennas. This explains the plot that we see here, i.e., not a constant zero for
all spectral window phases.

{| 
|[[Image:VLApipe-solint-ph-ea03-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 25a: Phase versus Time for ea03.]]
|[[Image:VLApipe-solint-ph-ea04-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|center|Fig. 25b: Phase versus Time for ea04.]]
|}
{|
|[[Image:VLApipe-solint-ph-ea09-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 25c: Phase versus Time for ea09.]]
|}

<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap;">
CHECK for: consistency with the data. The shortest solution interval should be close to the (longest) visibility integration time and the longest
gain calibration scan. Gains should be smooth with little variations in time (where larger gain variations are more likely to occur for higher
frequencies), phases should not show any jumps and should be relatively smooth in time (where larger phase variations are likely to occur for higher frequencies and longer baselines).
</pre>

==== '''[https://casa.nrao.edu/Data/EVLA/Pipeline/CASA5.1.2/html/t2-4m.html?sidebar=sidebar_stage13&ms=all&subpage=t2-4m_details.html Stage 13. hifv_fluxboot]: Gain table for flux density bootstrapping''' ====

Now, the fluxes are bootstrapped from the flux density calibrator to the complex gain
(amplitude and phase) calibrator. To do so, spectral indices are computed for the secondary calibrator and the absolute flux densities are determined for each channel. They are then inserted in the MODEL column via {{setjy}} and reported for each spectral window. 

For our example, the pipeline derives flux densities between 0.61 and 0.68 Jy for the phase calibrator, depending on frequency. The spectral behavior of the gain calibrator is reported as the source having a spectral index of around -0.5 (Fig. 26); a negative spectral index corresponds to a decline in flux density with increasing frequency. The plot also shows the models for both the flux density calibrator and the bootstrapped gain calibrator. 
{| 
|[[Image:VLApipe-fluxboot-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 26: The Stage 13 ''hifv_fluxboot'' task page.]]
|}	

<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap;">
CHECK for: that the values are close to the known fluxes of the calibrator. Check the VLA calibrator manual at https://science.nrao.edu/facilities/vla/observing/callist for consistency. Since most calibrator sources are time variable AGN, some differences to the VLA catalog are expected. In particular at higher frequencies they could be up to tens of percent.
</pre>

==== '''[https://casa.nrao.edu/Data/EVLA/Pipeline/CASA5.1.2/html/t2-4m.html?sidebar=sidebar_stage14&ms=all&subpage=t2-4m_details.html Stage 14. hifv_finalcals]: Final Calibration Tables''' ====

The final calibration tables are now derived. Those are the most important ones as they are applied to the data in stage 15. The tables, which contain antenna based solutions, are: Final delay, bandpass (BP) initial gain phase, BP Amp solution, BP Phase solution, Phase (short) gain solution, Final amp time cal, Final amp freq cal, and Final phase gain cal. We have already inspected and discussed similar solutions for the bandpass and for the temporal gain/phase calibration earlier. We shall now investigate further, starting with the temporal gains. 

The gains vary significantly for this observation. Typically, the gains stay within 10% around a normalized value of 1. Here, a few spectral windows (spws) show substantial deviations. Examples are (Fig. 27): Antenna ea02 has a drop around 5:50UT and should be checked (also ea01 which is not shown). Maybe the entire time between the adjacent, good calibrator scans should be flagged for this antenna. Antenna ea04 has an inverse behavior later, around 8:00UT. It appears that only a subset, e.g., a baseband, deviates from the rest. Antenna ea07 is more smooth, with some variations between the individual spws but overall a consistent temporal behavior. Likely this solution can be used with no further flagging. Note that the last scan is the flux density calibrator. This scan is expected to have different gains from those of the complex gain calibrator. Next, note that the ea09 gains are almost unity, which is expected. The gains in ea18 are smooth with a large dip in the first half.  This in fact does calibrate out some characteristics of the observations and could be left for the moment. As mentioned before, around 6:40UT, a pointing update was performed which seems to have rectified a possibly mis-pointed ea18. Antenna ea23 requires a single spectral window at a single time to be investigated and probably be flagged. The mechanical error that we have identified for the bandpass/flux calibrator scan using ea25 has affected the phase solutions. That explains the amplitude spread of the spws. In addition, this antenna also has a pointing error for the first half of the observation. We again recommend to flag the entire antenna.  
{| 
|[[Image:VLApipe-gains-ea02-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 27a: Temporal Gains for ea02.]]
|[[Image:VLApipe-gains-ea04-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|center|Fig. 27b: Temporal Gains for ea04.]]
|}
{|
|[[Image:VLApipe-gains-ea07-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 27c: Temporal Gains for ea07.]]
|[[Image:VLApipe-gains-ea09-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|center|Fig. 27d: Temporal Gains for ea09.]]
|}
{|
|[[Image:VLApipe-gains-ea18-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 27e: Temporal Gains for ea18.]]
|[[Image:VLApipe-gains-ea23-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|center|Fig. 27f: Temporal Gains for ea23.]]
|}
{|
|[[Image:VLApipe-gains-ea25-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 27g: Temporal Gains for ea25.]]
|}	



Now let's have a look at the gains as a function of frequency (Fig. 28). For ea02 we see that one line is below the rest. This is likely one specific time interval and indeed we have seen such a slip in Fig. 27a. Antenna ea04 has a very noisy time interval, which is also in agreement with what we have seen in the previous temporal gain plot. Antenna ea08 shows a consistent calibration and ea20 repeats the extra noise in the 34-35GHz range that may need to be flagged. Antenna ea25 now reflects the bandpass pattern that we have seen earlier and that explains the spread in Fig. 27. 

{| 
|[[Image:VLApipe-gainsfreq-ea02-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 28a: Spectral Gains for ea02.]]
|[[Image:VLApipe-gainsfreq-ea04-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|center|Fig. 28b: Spectral Gains for ea04.]]
|}
{|
|[[Image:VLApipe-gainsfreq-ea08-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 28c: Spectral Gains for ea08.]]
|[[Image:VLApipe-gainsfreq-ea20-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|center|Fig. 28d: Spectral Gains for ea20.]]
|}
{|
|[[Image:VLApipe-gainsfreq-ea25-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 28e: Spectral Gains for ea25.]]
|}	


The phases versus time ("Final phase gain cal") plots are shown in Fig. 29. Antenna ea02 clearly shows very erratic phase variations for one baseband or polarization. This is likely not recoverable. The user may plot the solution in {{plotcal}} or {{plotms}} and ''Locate'' the faulty spectral windows or polarizations and flag them. Antenna ea04, in contrast, exhibits very smooth phase variations until near the end of the observations. This has already been observed in the amplitude gains (Fig. 27b), should be looked at, and likely needs to be flagged. Antenna ea09 is the reference antenna and therefore has phase solutions that are zero as function of time. Antenna ea13 shows smooth variations and is an example for a credible calibration table. A spread between basebands or polarizations can be seen for ea15. The behavior is nevertheless smooth and the data should be calibrated nicely with this table. Antenna ea17, however, has, in addition to different behaviors for the basebands, also relatively large and erratic jumps between the calibration scans. This clearly needs to be looked into further and may require flagging, although the antenna did not show any issues in previous plots. Finally, ea20 has a relatively smooth behavior until the pointing update was performed (although the variations are relatively large). After the pointing scan, however, phases vary by about +/-50degree between individual, consecutive calibrator scans, which is large enough to be unreliable and to be flagged. 
{| 
|[[Image:VLApipe-phases-ea02-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 29a: Temporal Phases for ea02.]]
|[[Image:VLApipe-phases-ea04-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|center|Fig. 29b: Temporal Phases for ea04.]]
|}
{|
|[[Image:VLApipe-phases-ea09-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 29c: Temporal Phases for ea09.]]
|[[Image:VLApipe-phases-ea13-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|center|Fig. 29d: Temporal Phases for ea13.]]
|}
{|
|[[Image:VLApipe-phases-ea15-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 29e: Temporal Phases for ea15.]]
|[[Image:VLApipe-phases-ea17-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|center|Fig. 29f: Temporal Phases for ea17. ]]
|}
{|
|[[Image:VLApipe-phases-ea20-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 29g: Temporal Phases for ea20.]]
|}	

<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap;">
CHECK for: strong RFI and whether it was eliminated in later flagging stages or not (especially via a comparison with the output plots of task 14). Also check for jumps in phase and/or amplitude away from spectral window edges. If there are phase jumps for all but the reference antenna, maybe a different choice for the reference antenna should be considered. Also watch out for extreme delays of tens of ns and for very noisy data. 

Note that carefully checking calibrator tables in this stage is of particular importance as they are the final tables that are applied to the target source. Phase (and gain) calibration solutions should be inspected in their temporal variations to be smooth and consistent for each calibrator.
</pre>

==== '''[https://casa.nrao.edu/Data/EVLA/Pipeline/CASA5.1.2/html/t2-4m.html?sidebar=sidebar_stage15&ms=all&subpage=t2-4m_details.html Stage 15. hifv_applycals]: Apply calibrations from context''' ====

The calibration itself now concludes with the application of the derived calibration tables to the entire dataset. That includes all calibrators as well as the target sources. Note that there is no system temperature weighting of the calibration tables for the VLA (and the pipeline sets ''calwt=False'') since the switched power calibration is currently not used. 


In Fig. 30, we show the results of this step. The first table lists the calibration tables that are applied, and the fields, spectral windows, and antennas that are calibrated (although note that the spw 0 and 1 are only used for pointing scans and are not calibrated, despite them being listed here). The second table provides information on the flagging statistics. Failed calibration solutions result in flagged calibrator table entries and eventually the data will also be flagged as no calibration can be derived for such data. The following plots show the data of different calibrator and target sources and spectral windows (a plot per baseband) in different combinations of phase and amplitude against frequency.
{| 
|[[Image:VLApipe-applycals-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 30: The Stage 15 ''hifv_applycals'' task page.]]
|}


In Fig. 31 we show examples. a) A spectral window that drops in the calibrated spectrum indicates that it is mis-calibrated. b)  Although the phases are well calibrated, residual delays are still visible. The zig-zag pattern is due to a small mismatch in the delay measurement timing (also known as 'delay clunking'). This is an internally generated effect. Typically the effect is averaged out over time. 

{| 
|[[Image:VLApipe-applycal-ampfreq-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 31a: Calibrated data (amplitude versus frequency) where an spectral window near 34GHz has a drop in flux density.]]
|[[Image:VLApipe-applycal-phfreq-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|center|Fig. 31b: Phase versus frequency.]]
|}


<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap;">
CHECK for: a smooth amplitude versus frequency plot. Jumps may indicate mis-calibrated bandpass flux densities for a spectral window. 

Also the corrected amplitude of any calibrator source in each spectral window should be linear in shape and reflect the spectral index in its slope. Check for deviations from a flat amplitude versus uv-distance plot after the model was applied as it could indicate badly calibrated times or antennas.
</pre>

==== '''[https://casa.nrao.edu/Data/EVLA/Pipeline/CASA5.1.2/html/t2-4m.html?sidebar=sidebar_stage16&ms=all&subpage=t2-4m_details.html Stage 16. hifv_targetflag]: Targetflag''' ====

After the calibration tables are applied, the {{flagdata}} automated flagging routine rflag is run one more time on all sources to remove RFI and other outliers from the data. 

<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap;">
CHECK for: RFI removal in the target data (use plotms). Although flagging is performed for all fields, the calibration is applied in a previous stage and any additional flags have no more influence on the calibration tables. Flagging may, however, improve all images that are made in the following stages. In particular the target fields are flagged here for the first time which will benefit their image quality. FOR SPECTRAL LINE DATA: do not run this step unless a cont.dat file is provided (c.f. the VLA Pipeline Webpage at http://go.nrao.edu/vla-pipe). Otherwise the spectral lines may be flagged, too.
</pre>

==== '''[https://casa.nrao.edu/Data/EVLA/Pipeline/CASA5.1.2/html/t2-4m.html?sidebar=sidebar_stage17&ms=all&subpage=t2-4m_details.html Stage 17. hifv_statwt]: Reweight visibilities''' ==== 	

Since the VLA pipeline is currently not using the switched power calibration, there can be some sensitivity variations of the data over time due to changes in opacity, elevation, temperature (gradients) of the antennas, etc. So it is usually advisable to weigh the data according to the inverse of the square of their noise. This is done via the CASA task {{statwt}} and will increase the signal-to noise ratio of images. Note that features such as RFI spikes and spectral lines will influence RMS calculations and usually result in down-weighting data that includes such features.

<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap;">
CHECK for: there is no obvious diagnostic plot for this step but images that are created later should improve in their signal-to-noise. FOR SPECTRAL LINE DATA: do not run this step as spectral lines may be weighted down unless a cont.dat file is provided (cf the VLA Pipeline Webpage at http://go.nrao.edu/vla-pipe).
</pre>

==== '''[https://casa.nrao.edu/Data/EVLA/Pipeline/CASA5.1.2/html/t2-4m.html?sidebar=sidebar_stage18&ms=all&subpage=t2-4m_details.html Stage 18. hifv_plotsummary]: VLA Plot Summary''' ====	

This task produces diagnostic plots of the final, calibrated data. This includes phase as a function of time for all calibrators, as well as amplitude against uv-distance for each calibrator and target field.

Fig. 32 shows that the calibration around 6:00UT and 6:30UT is still somewhat noisy and additional flagging of the calibrators may be required. Field 12 looks as expected. One may want to check why some values in field 0 are very low and others in field 11 are quite high. Those could correspond to individual antennas, spectral windows, or polarizations. Again, some editing may be required and the pipeline restarted.
{| 
|[[Image:VLApipe-plotsummary-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 32: The Stage 18 ''hifv_plotsummary'' task page.]]
|}	

<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap;">
CHECK for: outliers, jumps, offsets, and excessive noise.
</pre>

==== '''[https://casa.nrao.edu/Data/EVLA/Pipeline/CASA5.1.2/html/t2-4m.html?sidebar=sidebar_stage19&ms=all&subpage=t2-4m_details.html Stage 19. hif_makeimlist]: Compile a list of cleaned images to be calculated''' ==== 	

Finally, diagnostic images are made for each spectral window (spw) of the phase and bandpass calibrators (calibrator selection is based on their intents; note that in our case the fallback of the bandpass calibration to use the flux density calibrator scans will not produce an image). The images and basic parameters such as pixel resolution (cell size) and image sizes are listed in this step. The images are available in the directory in which the pipeline was executed (usually where the SDM is located). At this time, images are produced for each spw using the multi-frequency synthesis algorithm, i.e. in continuum mode corrected for spectral dependencies using the stretched uv-coverage as sampled by the observed channel frequencies.

In Fig. 33 the images are listed with 0.31" cell/pixel size and 300 pixels on each side. Names and phase centers are given for each spectral window.
{| 
|[[Image:VLApipe-makeimlist-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 33: The Stage 19 ''hifv_makeimlist'' task page.]]
|}	

<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap;">
CHECK for: appropriate cell size for the images.
</pre>

==== '''[https://casa.nrao.edu/Data/EVLA/Pipeline/CASA5.1.2/html/t2-4m.html?sidebar=sidebar_stage20&ms=all&subpage=t2-4m_details.html Stage 20. hif_makeimages]: Calculate clean products''' ====

The images from the previous stage are shown in the final pipeline task. 

Imaging parameters are provided for each image (Fig. 34). They contain beam characteristics as well as image statistics. A comparison with the theoretical noise is also provided; theoretical noise values are based on bandwidth and integration time for typical VLA array parameters (via the radiometer equation). As mentioned earlier, the quality score is not fully implemented in this version of the pipeline and should be ignored. In our example, this stage also shows a number of warnings that indicate that the limit in clean iterations was hit before a calculated residual threshold has been reached. This indicates that the images could be cleaned more deeply. It is, however, a stop gap measure for cases where  clean does not converge.  

{| 
|[[Image:VLApipe-makeimages-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 34: The Stage 20 ''hifv_makeimages'' task page.]]
|}	

The full range of {{clean}} results can be accessed by the link under the images: "View other QA images...". For the first field, an example is given in Fig. 35. "Other QA images" will include: image, residual, and clean mask in the first row; the dirty image on the second row; and the primary beam, psf, and final model in the third row. 

{| 
|[[Image:VLApipe-cleanresults-CASA5.1.2.png|400px|thumb|left|Fig. 35: All QA images.]]
|}	


<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap;">
CHECK for: degraded images, strong ripples, calibrators that do not resemble the point spread function (psf). Such images may indicate RFI or mis-calibrated sources. If the actual rms is far from the theoretical noise, this could indicate that deeper cleaning is required. But that may not be important for these calibrator images.
</pre>


<!--
Version of this guide created by Juergen Ott, 2016 May 24
-->

{{Checked 5.1.2}}